ALIVE – AND STILL KICKING: THE RHS AT 150

M. Finn
{"title":"ALIVE – AND STILL KICKING: THE RHS AT 150","authors":"M. Finn","doi":"10.1017/S0080440118000154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marking and reflecting on the Royal Historical Society’s major anniversaries has not typically been a function of our Transactions. In his presidential address of February , C. W. C. Oman unsurprisingly made no mention of the Society’s fiftieth anniversary. Noting that he was employed at Whitehall in three different types of war work and had read only one book of history in the past year, Oman identified himself ‘as one of the much-cursed tribe of censors’ employed by the government to police dissemination of contemporary historical records, and proceeded to use this vantage point to reflect on what we now term ‘fake news’, that is ‘the genesis and development of Rumours, Reports, and Legends of a false or exaggerated sort, during times of military or political crisis’. Like Oman before him, R. A. (Robin) Humphreys, president of the Society at its centenary in , failed to note this milestone in the Transactions – indeed, no presidential address from  was published by the Society, with A Centenary Guide to the Publications of the Royal Historical Society – instead appearing to mark this anniversary. Ian Archer’s ‘ Years of Royal Historical Society Publishing’ in this volume thus represents an innovation – one that merits being read alongside both the articles here (drawn from our past year of public lectures and symposia), and also our new anniversary blog, Historical Transactions (https://blog.royalhistsoc.org/). Archer’s survey, informed not only by our archive and publications but also by his many years of sterling service for the Society as a literary director, provides several salutary reminders that the RHS is not now as pioneering as we may wish to think. He observes that women historians were prominent in the Society’s publications – winning two-thirds of the RHS Alexander Prizes between  and  and accounting for  per cent of published papers in the s, for example – long before the advent of second-wave feminism. Furthermore, earlier incarnations of the RHS (like the Society in )","PeriodicalId":23231,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","volume":"28 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0080440118000154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440118000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marking and reflecting on the Royal Historical Society’s major anniversaries has not typically been a function of our Transactions. In his presidential address of February , C. W. C. Oman unsurprisingly made no mention of the Society’s fiftieth anniversary. Noting that he was employed at Whitehall in three different types of war work and had read only one book of history in the past year, Oman identified himself ‘as one of the much-cursed tribe of censors’ employed by the government to police dissemination of contemporary historical records, and proceeded to use this vantage point to reflect on what we now term ‘fake news’, that is ‘the genesis and development of Rumours, Reports, and Legends of a false or exaggerated sort, during times of military or political crisis’. Like Oman before him, R. A. (Robin) Humphreys, president of the Society at its centenary in , failed to note this milestone in the Transactions – indeed, no presidential address from  was published by the Society, with A Centenary Guide to the Publications of the Royal Historical Society – instead appearing to mark this anniversary. Ian Archer’s ‘ Years of Royal Historical Society Publishing’ in this volume thus represents an innovation – one that merits being read alongside both the articles here (drawn from our past year of public lectures and symposia), and also our new anniversary blog, Historical Transactions (https://blog.royalhistsoc.org/). Archer’s survey, informed not only by our archive and publications but also by his many years of sterling service for the Society as a literary director, provides several salutary reminders that the RHS is not now as pioneering as we may wish to think. He observes that women historians were prominent in the Society’s publications – winning two-thirds of the RHS Alexander Prizes between  and  and accounting for  per cent of published papers in the s, for example – long before the advent of second-wave feminism. Furthermore, earlier incarnations of the RHS (like the Society in )
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活着,还在踢球:150岁的RHS
标记和反思皇家历史学会的主要周年纪念日通常不是我们交易的一项功能。在2月份的总统讲话中, 阿曼毫不奇怪地没有提及协会成立五十周年。阿曼注意到他曾在白厅从事三种不同类型的战争工作,在过去的一年里只读过一本历史书,他认为自己是政府雇佣的“备受诅咒的审查者部落之一”,负责监督当代历史记录的传播,并利用这一有利位置反思我们现在所说的“假新闻”,即“在军事或政治危机时期,虚假或夸大的谣言、报道和传说的起源和发展”。 和他之前的阿曼一样,R.A.(Robin)Humphreys是年协会成立一百周年的主席, 没有注意到交易中的这一里程碑——事实上 由英国皇家历史学会出版,附有《皇家历史学会出版物百年指南》– 而是出现在纪念这一周年。 伊恩·阿彻的 因此,本卷中的“皇家历史学会出版年份”代表了一种创新——值得与这里的文章(摘自我们过去一年的公开讲座和研讨会)以及我们新的周年纪念博客《历史交易》一起阅读(https://blog.royalhistsoc.org/)。Archer的调查不仅从我们的档案和出版物中得到了信息,还从他作为文学总监多年来为学会提供的出色服务中得到了启示,它提供了几个有益的提醒,即RHS现在并不像我们想象的那样具有开拓性。他观察到,女性历史学家在学会的出版物中很突出——在2008年至2008年期间,她赢得了RHS亚历山大奖的三分之二 和 以及 在s、 例如,早在第二波女权主义出现之前。此外,RHS的早期化身(如)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Royal Historical Society has published the highest quality scholarship in history for over 150 years. A subscription includes a substantial annual volume of the Society’s Transactions, which presents wide-ranging reports from the front lines of historical research by both senior and younger scholars, and two volumes from the Camden Fifth Series, which makes available to a wider audience valuable primary sources that have hitherto been available only in manuscript form.
期刊最新文献
A Sense of a European Present and its Passing during the Revolutions of 1848 Resisting Biographical Illusions: Pandurang Khankhoje, Indian Revolutionaries and the Anxiety to be Remembered Rethinking Transnational Activism through Regional Perspectives: Reflections, Literatures and Cases The Foods of Love? Food Gifts, Courtship and Emotions in Long Eighteenth-Century England ‘Slaves’ and ‘Slave Owners’ or ‘Enslaved People’ and ‘Enslavers’?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1