Evolution in the Genus Rhinella: A Total Evidence Phylogenetic Analysis of Neotropical True Toads (Anura: Bufonidae)

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1206/0003-0090.447.1.1
M. Pereyra, Boris L. Blotto, D. Baldo, J. C. Chaparro, S. Ron, A. Elias-Costa, P. P. Iglesias, P. Venegas, Maria Tereza C. Thomé, Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, N. M. Maciel, M. Rada, F. Kolenc, C. Borteiro, M. Rivera-Correa, Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, J. Moravec, I. J. De la Riva, W. Wheeler, Santiago Castroviejo‐Fisher, Taran Grant, C. Haddad, J. Faivovich
{"title":"Evolution in the Genus Rhinella: A Total Evidence Phylogenetic Analysis of Neotropical True Toads (Anura: Bufonidae)","authors":"M. Pereyra, Boris L. Blotto, D. Baldo, J. C. Chaparro, S. Ron, A. Elias-Costa, P. P. Iglesias, P. Venegas, Maria Tereza C. Thomé, Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, N. M. Maciel, M. Rada, F. Kolenc, C. Borteiro, M. Rivera-Correa, Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, J. Moravec, I. J. De la Riva, W. Wheeler, Santiago Castroviejo‐Fisher, Taran Grant, C. Haddad, J. Faivovich","doi":"10.1206/0003-0090.447.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT True toads of the genus Rhinella are among the most common and diverse group of Neotropical anurans. These toads are widely distributed throughout South America, inhabiting a great diversity of environments and ecoregions. Currently, however, the genus is defined solely on the basis of molecular characters, and it lacks a proper diagnosis. Although some phenetic species groups have traditionally been recognized within Rhinella, the monophyly of some of them have been rejected in previous phylogenetic analyses, and many species remain unassigned to these poorly defined groups. Additionally, the identity and taxonomy of several species are problematic and hinder the specific recognition and description of undescribed taxa. In this work, we first perform phylogenetic analyses of separate mitochondrial and nuclear datasets to test the possible occurrence of hybridization and/or genetic introgression in the genus. The comparative analysis of both datasets revealed unidirectional mitochondrial introgressions of an unknown parental species into R. horribilis (“ghost introgression”) and of R. dorbignyi into R. bernardoi; therefore, the mitochondrial and nuclear datasets of these species were considered separately in subsequent analyses. We performed total-evidence phylogenetic analyses that included revised molecular (four mitochondrial and five nuclear genes) and phenotypic (90 characters) datasets for 83 nominal species of Rhinella, plus several undescribed and problematic species and multiple outgroups. Results demonstrate that Rhinella was nonmonophyletic due to the position of R. ceratophrys, which was recovered as the sister taxon of Rhaebo nasicus with strong support. Among our outgroups, the strongly supported Anaxyrus + Incilius is the sister clade of all other species of Rhinella. Once R. ceratophrys is excluded, the genus Rhinella is monophyletic, well supported, and composed of two major clades. One of these is moderately supported and includes species of the former R. spinulosa Group (including R. gallardoi); the monophyletic R. granulosa, R. crucifer, and R. marina Groups; and a clade composed of the mitochondrial sequences of R. horribilis. The other major clade is strongly supported and composed of all the species from the non-monophyletic R. veraguensis and R. margaritifera Groups, the former R. acrolopha Group, and R. sternosignata. Consistent with these results, we define eight species groups of Rhinella that are mostly diagnosed by phenotypic synapomorphies in addition to a combination of morphological character states. Rhinella sternosignata is the only species that remains unassigned to any group. We also synonymize nine species, treat three former subspecies as full species, and suggest that 15 lineages represent putative undescribed species. Lastly, we discuss the apparently frequent occurrence of hybridization, deep mitochondrial divergence, and “ghost introgression”; the incomplete phenotypic evidence (including putative character systems that could be used for future phylogenetic analyses); and the validity of the known fossil record of Rhinella as a source of calibration points for divergence dating analyses.","PeriodicalId":50721,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090.447.1.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT True toads of the genus Rhinella are among the most common and diverse group of Neotropical anurans. These toads are widely distributed throughout South America, inhabiting a great diversity of environments and ecoregions. Currently, however, the genus is defined solely on the basis of molecular characters, and it lacks a proper diagnosis. Although some phenetic species groups have traditionally been recognized within Rhinella, the monophyly of some of them have been rejected in previous phylogenetic analyses, and many species remain unassigned to these poorly defined groups. Additionally, the identity and taxonomy of several species are problematic and hinder the specific recognition and description of undescribed taxa. In this work, we first perform phylogenetic analyses of separate mitochondrial and nuclear datasets to test the possible occurrence of hybridization and/or genetic introgression in the genus. The comparative analysis of both datasets revealed unidirectional mitochondrial introgressions of an unknown parental species into R. horribilis (“ghost introgression”) and of R. dorbignyi into R. bernardoi; therefore, the mitochondrial and nuclear datasets of these species were considered separately in subsequent analyses. We performed total-evidence phylogenetic analyses that included revised molecular (four mitochondrial and five nuclear genes) and phenotypic (90 characters) datasets for 83 nominal species of Rhinella, plus several undescribed and problematic species and multiple outgroups. Results demonstrate that Rhinella was nonmonophyletic due to the position of R. ceratophrys, which was recovered as the sister taxon of Rhaebo nasicus with strong support. Among our outgroups, the strongly supported Anaxyrus + Incilius is the sister clade of all other species of Rhinella. Once R. ceratophrys is excluded, the genus Rhinella is monophyletic, well supported, and composed of two major clades. One of these is moderately supported and includes species of the former R. spinulosa Group (including R. gallardoi); the monophyletic R. granulosa, R. crucifer, and R. marina Groups; and a clade composed of the mitochondrial sequences of R. horribilis. The other major clade is strongly supported and composed of all the species from the non-monophyletic R. veraguensis and R. margaritifera Groups, the former R. acrolopha Group, and R. sternosignata. Consistent with these results, we define eight species groups of Rhinella that are mostly diagnosed by phenotypic synapomorphies in addition to a combination of morphological character states. Rhinella sternosignata is the only species that remains unassigned to any group. We also synonymize nine species, treat three former subspecies as full species, and suggest that 15 lineages represent putative undescribed species. Lastly, we discuss the apparently frequent occurrence of hybridization, deep mitochondrial divergence, and “ghost introgression”; the incomplete phenotypic evidence (including putative character systems that could be used for future phylogenetic analyses); and the validity of the known fossil record of Rhinella as a source of calibration points for divergence dating analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rhinella属的进化:新热带真蟾蜍的全证据系统发育分析(无尾蟾蜍:蟾蜍科)
Rhinella属真蟾蜍是新热带无尾蟾蜍中最常见、最多样化的一种。这些蟾蜍广泛分布在整个南美洲,栖息在各种各样的环境和生态区。然而,目前,该属仅根据分子特征进行定义,缺乏正确的诊断。尽管一些表型物种群传统上在Rhinella中被识别,但其中一些物种的单系性在以前的系统发育分析中被拒绝,许多物种仍然没有被分配到这些定义不明确的类群中。此外,几个物种的身份和分类学存在问题,阻碍了对未描述分类群的具体识别和描述。在这项工作中,我们首先对单独的线粒体和细胞核数据集进行系统发育分析,以测试该属中杂交和/或遗传渗入的可能发生。对两个数据集的比较分析显示,一个未知亲本物种的线粒体单向渗入R.horribilis(“幽灵渗入”),而R.dorbignyi的线粒体单向侵入R.bernardoi;因此,在随后的分析中分别考虑了这些物种的线粒体和细胞核数据集。我们进行了全证据系统发育分析,其中包括83种标称Rhinella物种的修订分子(4个线粒体基因和5个核基因)和表型(90个特征)数据集,以及几个未描述和有问题的物种和多个外类群。结果表明,Rhinella是非单系统的,因为R.ceratophrys的位置,它在强有力的支持下被恢复为Rhaebo nasicus的姐妹分类单元。在我们的外类群中,强烈支持的Anaxyrus+Incilius是Rhinella所有其他物种的姐妹分支。一旦R.ceratophrys被排除在外,Rhinella属是单系的,得到了很好的支持,由两个主要的分支组成。其中一种得到了适度的支持,包括前棘乳豆属的物种(包括gallardoi乳豆属);单系颗粒R.granulara、十字花R.crosseer和码头R.marina群;和由可怕R.horribilis的线粒体序列组成的分支。另一个主要分支得到了有力的支持,由非单系的R.veragensis和R.margartifera群、前R.acropha群和R.sternosignata的所有物种组成。与这些结果一致,我们定义了Rhinella的八个物种群,除了形态特征状态的组合外,这些物种群主要通过表型突触形态来诊断。胸骨小鼻虫是唯一一个未被归入任何类群的物种。我们还将九个物种同义,将三个前亚种视为完整物种,并提出15个谱系代表假定的未描述物种。最后,我们讨论了明显频繁发生的杂交、线粒体深度分化和“幽灵渗入”;不完整的表型证据(包括可用于未来系统发育分析的假定特征系统);以及已知Rhinella化石记录作为差异定年分析校准点来源的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin, published continuously since 1881, consists of longer monographic volumes in the field of natural sciences relating to zoology, paleontology, and geology. Current numbers are published at irregular intervals. The Bulletin was originally a place to publish short papers, while longer works appeared in the Memoirs. However, in the 1920s, the Memoirs ceased and the Bulletin series began publishing longer papers. A new series, the Novitates, published short papers describing new forms.
期刊最新文献
Cranial and Postcranial Morphology of the Insectivoran-Grade Mammals Hsiangolestes and Naranius (Mammalia, Eutheria) with Analyses of Their Phylogenetic Relationships Generic Revisions of the Scopaeina and the Sphaeronina (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Lathrobiini) Transverse Canal Foramen and Pericarotid Venous Network in Metatheria and Other Mammals Systematic Revision of Thomasomys cinereus (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) from Northern Peru and Southern Ecuador, With Descriptions of Three New Species Comparative Anatomy of the Insect Tracheal System Part 1: Introduction, Apterygotes, Paleoptera, Polyneoptera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1