The development and pilot testing of a family treatment court best practices assessment: The model standards implementation scale

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12739
Margaret H. Lloyd Sieger, Jessica Becker, Kelly Earles, Karin Thompson-Wise, Kaitlin Hagain
{"title":"The development and pilot testing of a family treatment court best practices assessment: The model standards implementation scale","authors":"Margaret H. Lloyd Sieger,&nbsp;Jessica Becker,&nbsp;Kelly Earles,&nbsp;Karin Thompson-Wise,&nbsp;Kaitlin Hagain","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2019, the family treatment court (FTC) best practice standards (the <i>Standards</i>) were published to clarify attributes of FTC programs associated with superior child, parent, and family outcomes. The <i>Standards</i> cover the breadth of FTC operations including program structure and leadership, substance use treatment and complementary services, and behavioral responses to participants. This study aimed to develop an instrument (the Model Standards Implementation Scale; “MSIS”) that stakeholders can use to assess implementation of the <i>Standards</i> by individual FTCs. The MSIS balances usability with scientific validity. Interrater reliability (IRR), internal consistency, and several types of validity were assessed. Results indicated moderate to strong IRR, high internal consistency, mixed known groups validity depending on <i>Standard</i>, and high convergent and divergent validity. Initial findings suggest good validity and usability of the MSIS for evaluating FTC Standards' implementation. Notably, the process of using the tool functioned to educate FTC team members on the <i>Standards</i>. Although implementation of the MSIS is a resource-intensive process, the opportunity to receive constructive feedback proved to be an effective incentive for initial and subsequent participation in the evaluation among FTCs. Future research is needed to examine predictive validity, including association between <i>Standards</i>' implementation and family outcomes in FTCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 3","pages":"586-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, the family treatment court (FTC) best practice standards (the Standards) were published to clarify attributes of FTC programs associated with superior child, parent, and family outcomes. The Standards cover the breadth of FTC operations including program structure and leadership, substance use treatment and complementary services, and behavioral responses to participants. This study aimed to develop an instrument (the Model Standards Implementation Scale; “MSIS”) that stakeholders can use to assess implementation of the Standards by individual FTCs. The MSIS balances usability with scientific validity. Interrater reliability (IRR), internal consistency, and several types of validity were assessed. Results indicated moderate to strong IRR, high internal consistency, mixed known groups validity depending on Standard, and high convergent and divergent validity. Initial findings suggest good validity and usability of the MSIS for evaluating FTC Standards' implementation. Notably, the process of using the tool functioned to educate FTC team members on the Standards. Although implementation of the MSIS is a resource-intensive process, the opportunity to receive constructive feedback proved to be an effective incentive for initial and subsequent participation in the evaluation among FTCs. Future research is needed to examine predictive validity, including association between Standards' implementation and family outcomes in FTCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭治疗法院最佳做法评估的开发和试点测试:标准模型的实施规模
2019年,《家庭处理法院(FTC)最佳实践标准》(以下简称《标准》)发布,以澄清与优秀儿童、父母和家庭结果相关的FTC项目的属性。该标准涵盖了联邦贸易委员会业务的广度,包括项目结构和领导,药物使用治疗和补充服务,以及对参与者的行为反应。本研究旨在开发一种工具(标准实施范本;),供持份者评估个别贸易中心对标准的执行情况。MSIS平衡了可用性和科学有效性。评估了评估者间信度(IRR)、内部一致性和几种效度。结果显示,IRR中至强,内部一致性高,已知组混合效度取决于标准,收敛效度和发散效度高。初步调查结果表明,MSIS在评估联邦贸易委员会标准实施方面具有良好的有效性和可用性。值得注意的是,使用该工具的过程对FTC团队成员进行了标准教育。虽然国家战略评价的执行是一个资源密集的过程,但事实证明,有机会获得建设性的反馈是一种有效的激励措施,可促使国家间最初和随后参与评价工作。未来的研究需要检验预测有效性,包括FTCs中标准实施与家庭结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts Cheating the evidence to get to best interest and the presumption of unfitness Lies my child welfare system has told me: The critical importance of centering families' voices in family policing legal advocacy Unbundling marriage law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1