Political communication on Facebook: Do populist parties send out more posts?

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.1177/13540688231184626
J. P. Thomeczek
{"title":"Political communication on Facebook: Do populist parties send out more posts?","authors":"J. P. Thomeczek","doi":"10.1177/13540688231184626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars connect the rise of populist parties and the growing importance of social media platforms for political communication as the emerging social media logic seems well-suited to populist communication. The following research note presents a novel dataset that connects Facebook accounts to party-level populism data from the POPPA database. Over 600,000 posts from 226 parties between 2017 and 2019 were analysed. The results show that in most European countries, populist parties are more active than non-populist parties on Facebook. However, high variation in the frequency of posts emphasises that country-specific aspects play an important role. Generally, Italian parties are much more active than those from other countries, whereas those in Northern and Western Europe are the least active. The most active party in Europe, the Italian right-wing populist Lega, showed the most extreme level of activity: its daily activity is around 20 times higher than the median. Furthermore, this analysis highlights why researchers should carefully check Facebook data for implausible inactivity and how connecting different data resources can help overcome potential biases resulting from missing data. Future studies analysing any party communication on Facebook will benefit from the insights and the list of party accounts featured herein.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231184626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Scholars connect the rise of populist parties and the growing importance of social media platforms for political communication as the emerging social media logic seems well-suited to populist communication. The following research note presents a novel dataset that connects Facebook accounts to party-level populism data from the POPPA database. Over 600,000 posts from 226 parties between 2017 and 2019 were analysed. The results show that in most European countries, populist parties are more active than non-populist parties on Facebook. However, high variation in the frequency of posts emphasises that country-specific aspects play an important role. Generally, Italian parties are much more active than those from other countries, whereas those in Northern and Western Europe are the least active. The most active party in Europe, the Italian right-wing populist Lega, showed the most extreme level of activity: its daily activity is around 20 times higher than the median. Furthermore, this analysis highlights why researchers should carefully check Facebook data for implausible inactivity and how connecting different data resources can help overcome potential biases resulting from missing data. Future studies analysing any party communication on Facebook will benefit from the insights and the list of party accounts featured herein.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脸书上的政治交流:民粹主义政党会发布更多帖子吗?
学者们将民粹主义政党的兴起与社交媒体平台对政治传播日益重要联系起来,因为新兴的社交媒体逻辑似乎非常适合民粹主义传播。以下研究说明提供了一个新的数据集,将脸书账户与POPPA数据库中的政党级民粹主义数据联系起来。分析了2017年至2019年间来自226个政党的60多万条帖子。结果显示,在大多数欧洲国家,民粹主义政党在脸书上比非民粹主义政党更活跃。然而,员额频率的高度差异强调了国别方面发挥着重要作用。一般来说,意大利政党比其他国家的政党活跃得多,而北欧和西欧的政党则最不活跃。欧洲最活跃的政党,意大利右翼民粹主义政党Lega,表现出最极端的活动水平:其日常活动比中位数高出约20倍。此外,这项分析强调了为什么研究人员应该仔细检查脸书数据是否存在令人难以置信的不活跃,以及连接不同的数据资源如何有助于克服数据缺失带来的潜在偏见。未来分析脸书上任何党派交流的研究都将受益于本文的见解和党派账户列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1