BUILDING ENVELOPE RETROFIT FOR ENERGY SAVINGS IN MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT HIGH-RISE OFFICES: A CALIBRATED ENERGY SIMULATION

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.15124
Zalina Shari, Noor Laily Mohamad, N. Dahlan
{"title":"BUILDING ENVELOPE RETROFIT FOR ENERGY SAVINGS IN MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT HIGH-RISE OFFICES: A CALIBRATED ENERGY SIMULATION","authors":"Zalina Shari, Noor Laily Mohamad, N. Dahlan","doi":"10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.15124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nWith over a third of global energy used for building construction and operation, an optimum design for building envelopes is essential to improve the energy performance of the existing buildings. This study revealed that typical government high-rise office buildings in Malaysia have an average Building Energy Intensity (BEI) of 161 kWh/m2/year before any upgrading works on the air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation (ACMV) systems were conducted. This value is higher than the recommended value in Green Building Index (GBI) for commercial office buildings (150 kWh/m2/year) and the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) standard for public buildings (140 kWh/m2/year). Therefore, this study employed a case study approach combined with calibrated computer simulation to determine the optimal building envelope retrofit strategies and identify the three levels of interventions (minor, moderate and major levels) with corresponding energy reduction. A validated model representing a typical existing government high-rise office building in Malaysia was chosen as the base case model for energy evaluation studies. The effectiveness of each level of intervention and its energy retrofit measures (ERMs) were evaluated compared to the actual electricity bills. The results showed that all levels of interventions provided between 4% to 7% savings in annual energy consumption. The proposed interventions demonstrated compliance with the BEI benchmark margins of the GBI and EPU standard, namely 116 kWh/m2/year (minor intervention level), 113 kWh/m2/year (moderate intervention level), and 110 kWh/m2/year (major intervention level). \n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":47541,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.15124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With over a third of global energy used for building construction and operation, an optimum design for building envelopes is essential to improve the energy performance of the existing buildings. This study revealed that typical government high-rise office buildings in Malaysia have an average Building Energy Intensity (BEI) of 161 kWh/m2/year before any upgrading works on the air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation (ACMV) systems were conducted. This value is higher than the recommended value in Green Building Index (GBI) for commercial office buildings (150 kWh/m2/year) and the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) standard for public buildings (140 kWh/m2/year). Therefore, this study employed a case study approach combined with calibrated computer simulation to determine the optimal building envelope retrofit strategies and identify the three levels of interventions (minor, moderate and major levels) with corresponding energy reduction. A validated model representing a typical existing government high-rise office building in Malaysia was chosen as the base case model for energy evaluation studies. The effectiveness of each level of intervention and its energy retrofit measures (ERMs) were evaluated compared to the actual electricity bills. The results showed that all levels of interventions provided between 4% to 7% savings in annual energy consumption. The proposed interventions demonstrated compliance with the BEI benchmark margins of the GBI and EPU standard, namely 116 kWh/m2/year (minor intervention level), 113 kWh/m2/year (moderate intervention level), and 110 kWh/m2/year (major intervention level). 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚政府高层办公楼围护结构节能改造的校准能源模拟
全球超过三分之一的能源用于建筑施工和运营,建筑围护结构的优化设计对于提高现有建筑的能源性能至关重要。这项研究表明,在对空调和机械通风系统进行任何升级工程之前,马来西亚典型的政府高层办公楼的平均建筑能源强度(BEI)为161 kWh/m2/年。该值高于商业办公楼绿色建筑指数(GBI)中的建议值(150 kWh/m2/年)和公共建筑经济规划单位(EPU)标准(140 kWh/m2//年)。因此,本研究采用了一种案例研究方法,结合校准的计算机模拟,以确定最佳的建筑围护结构改造策略,并确定三个级别的干预措施(次要、中度和主要级别),并相应减少能源。选择一个代表马来西亚现有典型政府高层办公楼的验证模型作为能源评估研究的基本案例模型。与实际电费相比,评估了各级干预措施及其能源改造措施的有效性。结果表明,各级干预措施每年可节省4%至7%的能源消耗。拟议的干预措施证明符合GBI和EPU标准的BEI基准裕度,即116 kWh/m2/年(轻度干预水平)、113 kWh/m2/年(中度干预水平)和110 kWh/m2/年(主要干预水平)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊最新文献
A RECENT REVIEW OF THE SANDWICH-STRUCTURED COMPOSITE METAMATERIALS: STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS ANALYSIS OF ACTIVE SECONDARY SUSPENSION WITH MODIFIED SKYHOOK CONTROLLER TO IMPROVE RIDE PERFORMANCE OF RAILWAY VEHICLE DESIGNING THE TECHNOLOGY FOR TURBIDITY SENSOR-BASED AUTOMATIC RIVER SEDIMENTATION MEASUREMENT CFD SIMULATION AND VALIDATION FOR MIXING VENTILATION SCALED-DOWN EMPTY AIRCRAFT CABIN USING OPENFOAM COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONFIGURATIONS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC-THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR COGENERATION SYSTEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1