Development of Academic Leadership Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Yuksekogretim Dergisi Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.2399/yod.20.578370
İsmail Karsantık, Munevver Cetin
{"title":"Development of Academic Leadership Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability","authors":"İsmail Karsantık, Munevver Cetin","doi":"10.2399/yod.20.578370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leadership is considered as an ancient and multidimensional concept. Due to its contribution to the development of academic staff, the creation of a common culture in line with the interests and needs of stakeholders and the vision of the institution, and the distribution of workload, performance evaluation and management of resource use, academic leadership is associated with the concepts of professional development, higher education culture, and higher education management. The 50-item draft scale prepared by reviewing the related literature was given to 57 faculty members in the piloting stage, 490 faculty members in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) stage, and 200 faculty members in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) stage. The sample of the study was chosen by using the maximum variation sampling method. The three sub-dimensions (professional development, higher education culture and higher education administration) obtained as a result of the EFA applied to reveal the construct validity of the scale were also confirmed by the CFA. The reliability of the scale was found by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and each of its three sub-dimensions was found to be highly reliable. The results show that the Academic Leadership Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to reveal the academic leadership perceptions of faculty members.","PeriodicalId":42261,"journal":{"name":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.578370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leadership is considered as an ancient and multidimensional concept. Due to its contribution to the development of academic staff, the creation of a common culture in line with the interests and needs of stakeholders and the vision of the institution, and the distribution of workload, performance evaluation and management of resource use, academic leadership is associated with the concepts of professional development, higher education culture, and higher education management. The 50-item draft scale prepared by reviewing the related literature was given to 57 faculty members in the piloting stage, 490 faculty members in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) stage, and 200 faculty members in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) stage. The sample of the study was chosen by using the maximum variation sampling method. The three sub-dimensions (professional development, higher education culture and higher education administration) obtained as a result of the EFA applied to reveal the construct validity of the scale were also confirmed by the CFA. The reliability of the scale was found by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and each of its three sub-dimensions was found to be highly reliable. The results show that the Academic Leadership Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to reveal the academic leadership perceptions of faculty members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术领导能力量表的编制:有效性和可靠性研究
领导力被认为是一个古老而多元的概念。由于学术领导力有助于学术人员的发展,创造符合利益相关者利益和需求以及学校愿景的共同文化,以及工作量分配、绩效评估和资源使用管理,因此学术领导力与专业发展、高等教育文化、,以及高等教育管理。通过查阅相关文献编制的50项草案量表分为57名处于试点阶段的教员、490名处于探索性因素分析(EFA)阶段的教员和200名处于验证性因素分析阶段的教员。研究样本采用最大变异抽样法。CFA还确认了全民教育的三个子维度(专业发展、高等教育文化和高等教育管理),以揭示量表的结构有效性。该量表的可靠性是通过计算克朗巴赫α系数得出的,其三个子维度中的每一个都是高度可靠的。研究结果表明,学术领导力量表是一种有效、可靠的测量工具,可用于揭示教师的学术领导力认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yuksekogretim Dergisi
Yuksekogretim Dergisi EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Investigating student churn among business schools in higher education Cognitive Flexibility and Perceived Social Support as Predictors of University Students' Stress Levels in the COVID-19 Pandemic ÖRGÜTSEL DEDİKODU, DUYGUSAL TÜKENME VE İŞBİRLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ: TURİZM AKADEMİSYENLERİ ÖRNEĞİ In terms of chronotype, and academic achievement: Can an evening education program be an alternative? Nursing students' learning styles and attitudes towards learning: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1