A film treatment in ‘Layers’: a new approach to creative historical writing through screenwriting innovation

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Rethinking History Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1080/13642529.2023.2210390
Nadia Meneghello
{"title":"A film treatment in ‘Layers’: a new approach to creative historical writing through screenwriting innovation","authors":"Nadia Meneghello","doi":"10.1080/13642529.2023.2210390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper contains a case study of original creative historical screenwriting and its theoretical underpinnings. The creative writing component visualises the ‘true’ story of the Coolgardie Water Supply Scheme under construction in 1902 in Western Australia. It functions as an additional ‘layer’ to my previously published paper, ‘A Process of Screenwriting: A Film Treatment for “The Engineer-in-Chief”’, (Meneghello, Rethinking History, 2021). The theoretical component explores my own creative process of writing an artwork history as a filmic and poetic interpretation of history containing emotional subtextual meanings. I ask the question: How can archival richness and complexity be communicated in screenwriting beyond the restrictive form of the ‘script’? The aim of the essay is to describe how pursuing creative historical research has led me into screenwriting innovation. I do this by synthesising screenwriting theory and practice to consider how the film treatment is an underestimated tool of script development. I draw on the field of artwork history, incorporating the metaphor and imagery of the ‘archaeological gaze’ and cardiovascular biomechanics to bridge the gap between creative historical writing and screenwriting innovation. Drawing on Indigenous Studies, I show how my innovation honours both the collaborative dimensions of filmmaking as well as the importance of including absent and diverse voices from the historical record. This interdisciplinary framework supports the argument I make for conceptualising the film treatment in the form of ‘layers’. This new approach to screenwriting is particularly useful for researchers to test and experiment how facts can be translated using visual imagery and literary techniques into a cinematic rendering of a ‘true story’. My creative research thus has implications for the fields of both artwork history and screenwriting by enhancing the traditional screenplay format, and also contributes to historiography through the generation of new insights into how form shapes content and meaning.","PeriodicalId":46004,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2023.2210390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper contains a case study of original creative historical screenwriting and its theoretical underpinnings. The creative writing component visualises the ‘true’ story of the Coolgardie Water Supply Scheme under construction in 1902 in Western Australia. It functions as an additional ‘layer’ to my previously published paper, ‘A Process of Screenwriting: A Film Treatment for “The Engineer-in-Chief”’, (Meneghello, Rethinking History, 2021). The theoretical component explores my own creative process of writing an artwork history as a filmic and poetic interpretation of history containing emotional subtextual meanings. I ask the question: How can archival richness and complexity be communicated in screenwriting beyond the restrictive form of the ‘script’? The aim of the essay is to describe how pursuing creative historical research has led me into screenwriting innovation. I do this by synthesising screenwriting theory and practice to consider how the film treatment is an underestimated tool of script development. I draw on the field of artwork history, incorporating the metaphor and imagery of the ‘archaeological gaze’ and cardiovascular biomechanics to bridge the gap between creative historical writing and screenwriting innovation. Drawing on Indigenous Studies, I show how my innovation honours both the collaborative dimensions of filmmaking as well as the importance of including absent and diverse voices from the historical record. This interdisciplinary framework supports the argument I make for conceptualising the film treatment in the form of ‘layers’. This new approach to screenwriting is particularly useful for researchers to test and experiment how facts can be translated using visual imagery and literary techniques into a cinematic rendering of a ‘true story’. My creative research thus has implications for the fields of both artwork history and screenwriting by enhancing the traditional screenplay format, and also contributes to historiography through the generation of new insights into how form shapes content and meaning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《层次》中的电影处理:通过编剧创新实现历史创作的新途径
本文以历史原创编剧为研究对象,探讨其理论基础。创意写作部分将1902年西澳大利亚在建的库尔加迪供水计划的“真实”故事可视化。它作为我之前发表的论文的额外“层”,“剧本写作的过程:“总工程师”的电影处理”(Meneghello, Rethinking History, 2021)。理论部分探讨了我自己的创作过程,将艺术史作为包含情感潜台词的历史的电影和诗歌解释。我的问题是:如何在剧本的限制形式之外,通过剧本来传达档案的丰富性和复杂性?这篇文章的目的是描述追求创造性的历史研究是如何引导我进行编剧创新的。我通过综合剧本创作理论和实践来考虑电影处理是如何被低估的剧本开发工具。我借鉴艺术史领域,结合“考古凝视”和心血管生物力学的隐喻和意象,弥合创造性历史写作和编剧创新之间的差距。通过对土著研究的借鉴,我展示了我的创新是如何尊重电影制作的合作维度,以及包括历史记录中缺席和不同声音的重要性。这个跨学科的框架支持我以“层”的形式将电影处理概念化的论点。这种新的编剧方法对研究人员来说特别有用,他们可以测试和实验如何使用视觉图像和文学技巧将事实转化为“真实故事”的电影渲染。因此,我的创造性研究通过增强传统的剧本格式,对艺术史和剧本创作领域产生了影响,并通过对形式如何塑造内容和意义的新见解的产生,为史学做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking History
Rethinking History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.
期刊最新文献
“The dead do not negotiate”: Hilary Mantel, The Mirror and the Light , and Britain’s obsession with history The ethics of narrative: a readers’ dialogue Militarism in medievalism: the Prince of Thieves video game and the Gulf War Two concepts of apocalypse and apocalyptic history today Pietistic atheism and the modern breakthrough: on the narrative culture of secularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1