Men's politics, women's piety: The gendered asymmetry of Indonesia's new public Islams

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Australian Journal of Anthropology Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1111/taja.12401
Julian Millie
{"title":"Men's politics, women's piety: The gendered asymmetry of Indonesia's new public Islams","authors":"Julian Millie","doi":"10.1111/taja.12401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The importance of embodied religious practice to public Islam in Indonesia is easily underrated. This article undertakes an empirical examination of two domains of public Islam in Indonesia: women's piety and formal Islamic party politics. Based on research with women's groups in West Java, the author argues that Islamic party politics rely upon fragmentation resulting from different understandings of embodied practices, while the consensus supporting women's piety requires suppression of this fragmentation. Political actors locate themselves in a male-dominated political sphere by aligning within a matrix of different meanings of practices. Yet the national consensus that sustains support for the <i>majelis taklim</i> (women's study groups) encourages an undifferentiated approach to practice, in which motherhood metaphors serve as the basis for the public legitimacy of women's pious practice. However, in actual practice, many women, notably Muslim feminists, differentiate practices, thereby bringing them into the field of public contest.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"32 2","pages":"135-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/taja.12401","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.12401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of embodied religious practice to public Islam in Indonesia is easily underrated. This article undertakes an empirical examination of two domains of public Islam in Indonesia: women's piety and formal Islamic party politics. Based on research with women's groups in West Java, the author argues that Islamic party politics rely upon fragmentation resulting from different understandings of embodied practices, while the consensus supporting women's piety requires suppression of this fragmentation. Political actors locate themselves in a male-dominated political sphere by aligning within a matrix of different meanings of practices. Yet the national consensus that sustains support for the majelis taklim (women's study groups) encourages an undifferentiated approach to practice, in which motherhood metaphors serve as the basis for the public legitimacy of women's pious practice. However, in actual practice, many women, notably Muslim feminists, differentiate practices, thereby bringing them into the field of public contest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性的政治,女性的虔诚:印尼新公共伊斯兰教的性别不对称
在印尼,具体的宗教实践对公众伊斯兰教的重要性很容易被低估。本文对印度尼西亚公共伊斯兰教的两个领域进行了实证研究:妇女的虔诚和正式的伊斯兰政党政治。基于对西爪哇妇女团体的研究,作者认为伊斯兰政党政治依赖于对具体实践的不同理解而产生的分裂,而支持妇女虔诚的共识则需要压制这种分裂。政治行动者将自己定位在男性主导的政治领域,通过在不同意义的实践矩阵中对齐。然而,维持对majelis taklim(妇女研究小组)支持的全国共识鼓励一种无差别的实践方法,在这种方法中,母性隐喻作为妇女虔诚实践的公共合法性的基础。然而,在实际实践中,许多女性,特别是穆斯林女权主义者,将实践区分开来,从而将其带入公共争论的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial The Fences: A webcomic on collective debt and ruination in Paraguay Fire's habit: Elemental media and the politics of apprehension Filming jilba: Sensing beyond the exclusionary fictions of climate science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1