Benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy: implications for the CSR performance of fast fashion brands

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Product and Brand Management Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850
Xiaoyong Wei, Sojin Jung
{"title":"Benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy: implications for the CSR performance of fast fashion brands","authors":"Xiaoyong Wei, Sojin Jung","doi":"10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWhen fast fashion brands launch corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs, consumers may consider these brands to behave hypocritically as their business model is generally perceived as being inconsistent with sustainable practices. Built on construal level theory (CLT), this study aims to examine how the benefit appeals that are widely used in CSR initiatives affect perceived corporate hypocrisy and the CSR performance of fast fashion brands.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study designed an online experiment with a 2 (fashion brand: fast fashion vs. unknown) × 2 (benefit appeal: self-benefit vs other-benefit) stimulus, using a virtual label named “Eco Care” for experimental manipulation. A total number of 298 Chinese consumers participated in the experiment and they answered an online survey.\n\n\nFindings\nIt was found that the brand types (fast fashion vs unknown) and benefit appeals (self-benefit vs other benefit) did not elicit perceived corporate hypocrisy nor did them directly affect perceptions of CSR performance. However, there was a significant interaction effect of them. That is, fast fashion brand’s CSR performance was judged based on how the brand framed its sustainability claims. A fast fashion brand’s CSR label significantly increased hypocrisy perceptions when the label used a self-benefit appeal and the interactive effect of the fast fashion brand and the self-benefit appeal hindered the formation of a green brand image and brand purchase intentions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study adds a body of knowledge to the literature by examining the relationship between benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy from the perspective of CLT. The findings can help fast fashion marketers better understand the critical role of benefit appeals by acknowledging that the misuse of communication strategies may result in unfavorable consequences, thus ruining their efforts to improve their brand’s image.\n","PeriodicalId":48172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose When fast fashion brands launch corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs, consumers may consider these brands to behave hypocritically as their business model is generally perceived as being inconsistent with sustainable practices. Built on construal level theory (CLT), this study aims to examine how the benefit appeals that are widely used in CSR initiatives affect perceived corporate hypocrisy and the CSR performance of fast fashion brands. Design/methodology/approach This study designed an online experiment with a 2 (fashion brand: fast fashion vs. unknown) × 2 (benefit appeal: self-benefit vs other-benefit) stimulus, using a virtual label named “Eco Care” for experimental manipulation. A total number of 298 Chinese consumers participated in the experiment and they answered an online survey. Findings It was found that the brand types (fast fashion vs unknown) and benefit appeals (self-benefit vs other benefit) did not elicit perceived corporate hypocrisy nor did them directly affect perceptions of CSR performance. However, there was a significant interaction effect of them. That is, fast fashion brand’s CSR performance was judged based on how the brand framed its sustainability claims. A fast fashion brand’s CSR label significantly increased hypocrisy perceptions when the label used a self-benefit appeal and the interactive effect of the fast fashion brand and the self-benefit appeal hindered the formation of a green brand image and brand purchase intentions. Originality/value This study adds a body of knowledge to the literature by examining the relationship between benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy from the perspective of CLT. The findings can help fast fashion marketers better understand the critical role of benefit appeals by acknowledging that the misuse of communication strategies may result in unfavorable consequences, thus ruining their efforts to improve their brand’s image.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益诉求与企业虚伪:对快时尚品牌企业社会责任表现的启示
当快时尚品牌启动企业社会责任(CSR)计划时,消费者可能会认为这些品牌的行为是虚伪的,因为他们的商业模式通常被认为与可持续实践不一致。基于解释层次理论(CLT),本研究旨在探讨企业社会责任倡议中广泛使用的利益诉求如何影响企业伪善感知和快时尚品牌的企业社会责任绩效。设计/方法/方法本研究设计了一个2(时尚品牌:快时尚vs未知)× 2(利益诉求:自我利益vs他人利益)刺激的在线实验,使用虚拟标签“Eco Care”进行实验操作。共有298名中国消费者参与了这项实验,他们回答了一份在线调查。结果发现,品牌类型(快时尚vs未知)和利益诉求(自身利益vs其他利益)不会引起企业虚伪的感知,也不会直接影响企业社会责任绩效的感知。但两者之间存在显著的交互作用。也就是说,快时尚品牌的企业社会责任表现是根据该品牌如何构建其可持续发展主张来判断的。快时尚品牌的社会责任标签在使用自利诉求时显著增加了人们的伪善感知,快时尚品牌与自利诉求的互动效应阻碍了绿色品牌形象和品牌购买意愿的形成。原创性/价值本研究通过从CLT的角度考察利益诉求与感知企业伪善之间的关系,为文献增加了知识体系。这些发现可以帮助快时尚营销人员更好地理解利益诉求的关键作用,认识到误用传播策略可能会导致不利的后果,从而破坏他们改善品牌形象的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Branding has evolved and organizations are facing a lot of new challenges when managing their brand reputations, an activity that has become strategic and interdisciplinary. The Journal of Product and Brand Management (JPBM) advances the theoretical and managerial knowledge of products and brands. Manuscripts may either report results based on rigorously analysed qualitative/quantitative data or be purely conceptual. All manuscripts must offer significant research findings and insights and offer meaningful implications for the real world. This journal is proudly international and inter-disciplinary. We publish manuscripts which compare international markets and encourage submissions approaching branding and product management from any discipline. We focus on all aspects of branding and product management from development to dilution. This includes areas as broad as person, place or political brands.
期刊最新文献
Understanding copycat packaging: a systematic review and research directions Brand purpose: a literature review and BEING implementation framework Make it unique! Why embossed product labels increase purchase intentions and willingness to pay The effect of virtual anchor appearance on purchase intention: a perceived warmth and competence perspective Sustainable food packaging: engagement through the public discourse on social networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1