Mothers’ and fathers’ bimodal communication in dyadic and triadic interaction with their infants

IF 1.2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS First Language Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI:10.1177/01427237221126260
Mara Morelli, R. Baiocco, E. Cattelino, E. Longobardi
{"title":"Mothers’ and fathers’ bimodal communication in dyadic and triadic interaction with their infants","authors":"Mara Morelli, R. Baiocco, E. Cattelino, E. Longobardi","doi":"10.1177/01427237221126260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parents play an important role in children’s language development. To our knowledge, no studies have compared fathers’ and mothers’ use of gestural and verbal communication in dyadic versus triadic contexts. This study aimed at analyzing similarities and differences in the bimodal communication of parents when they play alone with their infant and when all three play together. Twelve Italian-speaking families with infants aged 16 months took part in the study. Dyadic and triadic free-play interactions of mothers and fathers with their infants were videotaped. Mothers’ and fathers’ communicative acts (i.e., ‘only speech’, ‘only gesture’, ‘speech + gesture’), and types of gestures (i.e., deictic, representational, and emphatic) were coded. Results showed that infants experience mothers’ and fathers’ bimodal communication when interacting with both parents. In the dyadic context, mothers produced more communicative acts and more verbal communication than fathers who in turn used more gestures and ‘speech + gesture’ communicative acts than mothers. Both parents used gestures to clarify and reinforce their verbal communication in dyadic and triadic contexts. With respect to the triadic context, no differences between mothers’ and fathers’ verbal and non-verbal communication emerged. Comparing each parent across the two contexts, findings showed that in the triadic context, mothers increased their use of gestural communicative acts and decreased their use of mixed acts, whereas fathers increased their verbal component while decreasing their ‘speech + gesture’ communicative acts. It seems that in the triadic context there is a coordination between parents that leads them to align with the kind of communication provided to the infant. Thus, the input experienced by infants in the triadic context is still equally composed of both verbal and non-verbal communication. Results are discussed considering the role of parents’ bimodal communication within several daily interactional contexts.","PeriodicalId":47254,"journal":{"name":"First Language","volume":"43 1","pages":"158 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221126260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Parents play an important role in children’s language development. To our knowledge, no studies have compared fathers’ and mothers’ use of gestural and verbal communication in dyadic versus triadic contexts. This study aimed at analyzing similarities and differences in the bimodal communication of parents when they play alone with their infant and when all three play together. Twelve Italian-speaking families with infants aged 16 months took part in the study. Dyadic and triadic free-play interactions of mothers and fathers with their infants were videotaped. Mothers’ and fathers’ communicative acts (i.e., ‘only speech’, ‘only gesture’, ‘speech + gesture’), and types of gestures (i.e., deictic, representational, and emphatic) were coded. Results showed that infants experience mothers’ and fathers’ bimodal communication when interacting with both parents. In the dyadic context, mothers produced more communicative acts and more verbal communication than fathers who in turn used more gestures and ‘speech + gesture’ communicative acts than mothers. Both parents used gestures to clarify and reinforce their verbal communication in dyadic and triadic contexts. With respect to the triadic context, no differences between mothers’ and fathers’ verbal and non-verbal communication emerged. Comparing each parent across the two contexts, findings showed that in the triadic context, mothers increased their use of gestural communicative acts and decreased their use of mixed acts, whereas fathers increased their verbal component while decreasing their ‘speech + gesture’ communicative acts. It seems that in the triadic context there is a coordination between parents that leads them to align with the kind of communication provided to the infant. Thus, the input experienced by infants in the triadic context is still equally composed of both verbal and non-verbal communication. Results are discussed considering the role of parents’ bimodal communication within several daily interactional contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲和父亲与婴儿二元和三元互动中的双峰交流
父母在孩子的语言发展中起着重要的作用。据我们所知,还没有研究比较过父亲和母亲在二元和三元情境下使用手势和语言交流的情况。本研究旨在分析父母与婴儿单独玩耍和三人一起玩耍时双峰沟通的异同。12个有16个月大婴儿的意大利语家庭参与了这项研究。对母亲和父亲与婴儿的二元和三元自由游戏互动进行录像。母亲和父亲的交流行为(即“仅言语”、“仅手势”、“言语+手势”)和手势类型(即指示、表征和强调)被编码。结果表明,婴儿在与父母双方互动时经历了母亲和父亲的双峰交流。在二元语境中,母亲比父亲产生更多的交流行为和语言交流,而父亲又比母亲使用更多的手势和“语言+手势”交流行为。父母双方都使用手势来澄清和加强他们在二元和三元语境中的言语交流。在三元语境中,母亲和父亲的语言和非语言交际没有差异。对比两种情境下的每一位父母,结果显示,在三元情境下,母亲增加了对手势交际行为的使用,减少了对混合行为的使用,而父亲增加了语言成分,减少了“语言+手势”的交际行为。似乎在三位一体的情况下,父母之间有一种协调,使他们与提供给婴儿的那种交流保持一致。因此,婴儿在三合一语境中所经历的输入仍然是由语言和非语言交流同等组成的。考虑到父母的双峰沟通在几个日常互动环境中的作用,讨论了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
First Language
First Language Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: First Language is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in child language acquisition. Child language research is multidisciplinary and this is reflected in the contents of the journal: research from diverse theoretical and methodological traditions is welcome. Authors from a wide range of disciplines - including psychology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, neuroscience, communication, sociology and education - are regularly represented in our pages. Empirical papers range from individual case studies, through experiments, observational/ naturalistic, analyses of CHILDES corpora, to parental surveys.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Does the processing advantage of formulaic language persist in its nonadjacent forms? Evidence from Chinese collocation processing in children” Inflectional morphology and reading comprehension in low SES Arabic-speaking second graders Corrigendum to “Establishing Guidelines for MLU measurement in an agglutinating language: An illustration of Georgian” Development of derivational morphology in Kuwaiti Arabic-speaking children Book Review: Zarchy, R. M. & Geer, L. C., A family-centered signed language curriculum to support deaf children’s language acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1