SEEING DOUBLE: THE SUBJECT OF VISION IN LEE FRIEDLANDER’S SELF-PORTRAITURE

Surya Bowyer
{"title":"SEEING DOUBLE: THE SUBJECT OF VISION IN LEE FRIEDLANDER’S SELF-PORTRAITURE","authors":"Surya Bowyer","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2020.1779791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American photographer Lee Friedlander’s photographs are often deemed to be unreadable. This critical assessment of his work is principally based on his manipulation of reflection, framing, and superimposition. This essay takes these manipulations as its subject. I suggest one method of reading the unreadable, focusing particularly on two self-portraits: Tallahassee, Florida 1969 and Madison, Wisconsin 1966. My approach weaves together the ideas of Jacques Lacan and Homi Bhabha. In the first section, I place Lacan’s concept of the stain into dialogue with the recurring appearance of Friedlander’s own shadow in his self-portraiture. In the second, I bring Bhabha into conversation with Lacan, showing crossovers in how they conceptualise reflections. I argue that Tallahassee and Madison visually articulate these crossovers. In the third, I use Bhabha’s concept of doubling to approach the two photographs’ delineation of the Lacanian gaze. In forging links between Friedlander, Lacan, and Bhabha, I propose two complementary ideas. The first is that Friedlander’s photographs help to illustrate commonality between Lacan’s and Bhabha’s work. The second is that Lacan and Bhabha help us read Friedlander’s often perplexing self-portraits. By expressing an absence of the self, these photographs comment on the impossibility of self-portraiture.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17540763.2020.1779791","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2020.1779791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

American photographer Lee Friedlander’s photographs are often deemed to be unreadable. This critical assessment of his work is principally based on his manipulation of reflection, framing, and superimposition. This essay takes these manipulations as its subject. I suggest one method of reading the unreadable, focusing particularly on two self-portraits: Tallahassee, Florida 1969 and Madison, Wisconsin 1966. My approach weaves together the ideas of Jacques Lacan and Homi Bhabha. In the first section, I place Lacan’s concept of the stain into dialogue with the recurring appearance of Friedlander’s own shadow in his self-portraiture. In the second, I bring Bhabha into conversation with Lacan, showing crossovers in how they conceptualise reflections. I argue that Tallahassee and Madison visually articulate these crossovers. In the third, I use Bhabha’s concept of doubling to approach the two photographs’ delineation of the Lacanian gaze. In forging links between Friedlander, Lacan, and Bhabha, I propose two complementary ideas. The first is that Friedlander’s photographs help to illustrate commonality between Lacan’s and Bhabha’s work. The second is that Lacan and Bhabha help us read Friedlander’s often perplexing self-portraits. By expressing an absence of the self, these photographs comment on the impossibility of self-portraiture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重视觉:李·弗里德兰德自画像的视觉主题
美国摄影师李·弗里德兰德的照片经常被认为是无法阅读的。这种对他的作品的批判性评价主要基于他对反思、框架和叠加的处理。本文以这些操作为主题。我建议用一种方法来阅读不可读的东西,特别关注两幅自画像:1969年佛罗里达州塔拉哈西和1966年威斯康星州麦迪逊。我的方法将雅克·拉坎和霍米·巴巴的思想交织在一起。在第一节中,我将拉康的污点概念与弗里德兰德在其自画像中反复出现的自己的影子进行了对话。在第二章中,我将Bhabha带入了与Lacan的对话中,展示了他们如何将反思概念化的交叉点。我认为塔拉哈西和麦迪逊在视觉上清晰地表达了这些交叉。在第三章中,我使用了Bhabha的双重概念来接近这两张照片对拉康凝视的描绘。在建立Friedlander、Lacan和Bhabha之间的联系时,我提出了两个互补的想法。首先,弗里德兰德的照片有助于说明拉康和巴作品之间的共性。第二,拉康和巴哈帮助我们阅读弗里德兰德经常令人困惑的自画像。这些照片通过表达自我的缺失,评论了自画像的不可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Photographies
Photographies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
WHAT IF INDIANS INVENTED PHOTOGRAPHY? EYES AND WINGS: GRACIELA ITURBIDE’S BIRD IMAGES Plastic borders: on the photographic frame and its virtual experience LINES AND BETRAYALS: THE COLONIAL OCCUPATION OF THE KWANYAMA KINGDOM ON THE ANGOLA/NAMIBIA BORDER AND POSTMORTEM PHOTOGRAPHS OF MANDUME YA NDEMUFAYO (1917) DRIFT ALIGNMENT: ASTRONOMY, CELESTIAL NAVIGATION, AND THE US-MEXICO BORDER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1