Moving Beyond the Paradigm Wars: Emergent Approaches for Education Research

IF 2.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Research in Education Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.3102/0091732X20909400
M. Pivovarova, Jeanne M. Powers, Gustavo E. Fischman
{"title":"Moving Beyond the Paradigm Wars: Emergent Approaches for Education Research","authors":"M. Pivovarova, Jeanne M. Powers, Gustavo E. Fischman","doi":"10.3102/0091732X20909400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I 2002, the National Research Council (NRC) released a report that articulated its vision about education research (Eisenhart & Towne, 2003; Feuer et al., 2002), which focused on scientifically based research methods. The release of the report was followed by an extensive debate and is broadly understood as part of the long-standing “paradigm war”1 in the field (Fischman & Tefera, 2014; Munoz-Najar Galvez et al., 2019). Some of the scholars defending the criteria advanced by the report had somewhat traditionally dismissive views of education research “as something of a stepchild, reluctantly tolerated at the margins of academe and rarely trusted by policy makers, practitioners, or members of the public at large” (Lagemann, 2000, p. x). A similar perspective was advanced by Grover Whitehurst, the influential director of the Institute of Education Sciences from 2002 to 2008, who claimed that the","PeriodicalId":47753,"journal":{"name":"Review of Research in Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"vii - xvi"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3102/0091732X20909400","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20909400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

I 2002, the National Research Council (NRC) released a report that articulated its vision about education research (Eisenhart & Towne, 2003; Feuer et al., 2002), which focused on scientifically based research methods. The release of the report was followed by an extensive debate and is broadly understood as part of the long-standing “paradigm war”1 in the field (Fischman & Tefera, 2014; Munoz-Najar Galvez et al., 2019). Some of the scholars defending the criteria advanced by the report had somewhat traditionally dismissive views of education research “as something of a stepchild, reluctantly tolerated at the margins of academe and rarely trusted by policy makers, practitioners, or members of the public at large” (Lagemann, 2000, p. x). A similar perspective was advanced by Grover Whitehurst, the influential director of the Institute of Education Sciences from 2002 to 2008, who claimed that the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越范式战争:教育研究的新兴方法
2002年,美国国家研究委员会(NRC)发布了一份报告,阐述了其对教育研究的愿景(Eisenhart & Towne, 2003;Feuer et al., 2002),侧重于基于科学的研究方法。该报告的发布引发了广泛的争论,并被广泛理解为该领域长期存在的“范式战争”的一部分(Fischman & Tefera, 2014;Munoz-Najar Galvez等人,2019)。一些为该报告提出的标准辩护的学者,有些传统地对教育研究持否定态度,认为它“就像一个继子,在学术界的边缘勉强容忍,很少得到政策制定者、从业者或公众的信任”(Lagemann, 2000, p. x)。2002年至2008年期间担任教育科学研究所(Institute of education Sciences)有影响力的主任的格罗弗·怀特赫斯特(Grover Whitehurst)也提出了类似的观点,他声称,教育研究是一种教育研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Research in Education
Review of Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Review of Research in Education (RRE), published annually since 1973 (approximately 416 pp./volume year), provides an overview and descriptive analysis of selected topics of relevant research literature through critical and synthesizing essays. Articles are usually solicited for specific RRE issues. There may also be calls for papers. RRE promotes discussion and controversy about research problems in addition to pulling together and summarizing the work in a field.
期刊最新文献
Creative Methods for Creativity Research(ers)? Speculations Creativity as a Racializing and Ableizing Scientific Object: Disentangling the Democratic Impulse From Justice-Oriented Futures To Democratize, First Decolonize: Approaches Beyond Eurocentric and Colonial Epistemologies in Creativity Unapologetically Black Creative Educational Experiences in Higher Education: A Critical Review Exploring Conceptions of Creativity and Latinidad in Environmental Education Through the Lens of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1