Differential Age-Related Effects on Visual- and Associative-Based Semantic Encoding

Q1 Social Sciences JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2017-04-19 DOI:10.1111/jabr.12070
Davynn G. H. Tan, Eric W. Tsang, Kin-chung Tang, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Karen P. Y. Liu, Yi Wu
{"title":"Differential Age-Related Effects on Visual- and Associative-Based Semantic Encoding","authors":"Davynn G. H. Tan,&nbsp;Eric W. Tsang,&nbsp;Kin-chung Tang,&nbsp;Chetwyn C. H. Chan,&nbsp;Karen P. Y. Liu,&nbsp;Yi Wu","doi":"10.1111/jabr.12070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated how aging modulates semantic encoding. We used a task where participants were required to determine the semantic relatedness between the cue and target stimuli. Single-character Chinese words were the cues, whereas two-character words describing the cues were the targets. The targets can be visual-based (appearance) or associative-based (meaning). Experiment One compared the reaction times on the two types of targets between older (<i>n</i> = 29) and younger participants (<i>n</i> = 31). Older participants performed significantly slower on the visual- than associative-based trials, while the younger participants showed no difference. The results suggest that aging would hinder semantic encoding of visual- rather than associative-based processes. The slowness in processing is likely attributable to age-related decline in attentional control. Experiment Two tested the aging effect on top-down attentional control by presenting pre-cue before each trial on older (<i>n</i> = 26) and younger participants (<i>n</i> = 49). The results indicated that valid pre-cue reduced the latency differences between the visual- and associative-based trials among the older participants. The valid pre-cues were found to effectively shorten the reaction time of the visual-based trials suggesting possible facilitation of attentional control among the older adults. Our findings substantiate age-related attentional control decline only in visual- but not associative-based processing. Future studies should explore the mechanisms underlying such differential age-related effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":45868,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jabr.12070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jabr.12070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated how aging modulates semantic encoding. We used a task where participants were required to determine the semantic relatedness between the cue and target stimuli. Single-character Chinese words were the cues, whereas two-character words describing the cues were the targets. The targets can be visual-based (appearance) or associative-based (meaning). Experiment One compared the reaction times on the two types of targets between older (n = 29) and younger participants (n = 31). Older participants performed significantly slower on the visual- than associative-based trials, while the younger participants showed no difference. The results suggest that aging would hinder semantic encoding of visual- rather than associative-based processes. The slowness in processing is likely attributable to age-related decline in attentional control. Experiment Two tested the aging effect on top-down attentional control by presenting pre-cue before each trial on older (n = 26) and younger participants (n = 49). The results indicated that valid pre-cue reduced the latency differences between the visual- and associative-based trials among the older participants. The valid pre-cues were found to effectively shorten the reaction time of the visual-based trials suggesting possible facilitation of attentional control among the older adults. Our findings substantiate age-related attentional control decline only in visual- but not associative-based processing. Future studies should explore the mechanisms underlying such differential age-related effect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同年龄对视觉和联想语义编码的影响
这项研究调查了衰老如何调节语义编码。我们使用了一项任务,要求参与者确定线索和目标刺激之间的语义相关性。单个汉字词是线索,而描述线索的两个汉字词是目标。目标可以是基于视觉的(外观)或基于关联的(含义)。实验一比较了老年人(n=29)和年轻人(n=31)对两种目标的反应时间。年长的参与者在基于视觉的试验中的表现明显慢于基于联想的试验,而年轻的参与者没有表现出任何差异。结果表明,衰老会阻碍基于视觉而非联想的过程的语义编码。处理过程的缓慢可能归因于与年龄相关的注意力控制能力下降。实验二通过在每次试验前对老年人(n=26)和年轻人(n=49)进行预提示,测试了衰老对自上而下注意力控制的影响。结果表明,有效的预提示降低了老年参与者中基于视觉和联想的试验之间的潜伏期差异。有效的预先提示被发现可以有效缩短基于视觉的试验的反应时间,这表明老年人可能有利于注意力控制。我们的研究结果证实,与年龄相关的注意力控制能力下降仅发生在基于视觉而非联想的处理中。未来的研究应该探索这种与年龄相关的差异效应的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, launched in 1993, aims to disseminate findings of behavioral science research which have applications to current problems of society. By publishing relevant research and emphasizing the excellence of experimental design, as well as potential applicability of experimental results, the journal bridges the theoretical and applied areas of biobehavioral research. The Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research serves as a means of communication among scientists, as well as between researchers and those engaged in the task of solving social and biomedical problems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The long-term consequences of peer victimization on physical and psychological health: A longitudinal study Learning to cope with everyday instances of social exclusion: A review of emotional and cognitive strategies for children and adolescents Issue Information Peer victimization and cortisol production in children and adolescents: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1