Too taxing, too much taxing, or not progressive enough? The introduction of a wealth tax as an equality imperative in South Africa

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2022.2090428
Justin Winchester
{"title":"Too taxing, too much taxing, or not progressive enough? The introduction of a wealth tax as an equality imperative in South Africa","authors":"Justin Winchester","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2090428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract South Africa’s status as the most unequal country in the world unacceptably mocks the Constitution’s promise to achieve an equal society. Positing the introduction of a progressive, recurring, threshold-tested tax on private net wealth holding as a solution to this inequality, this article asks whether there is a constitutional imperative to introduce a wealth tax in South Africa. Arguing in the affirmative, the article situates the debate in the context of the shift in economic policy-making from a focus on labour income to wealth given global economic, political, and social concerns inherent in extremely wealth-unequal societies. The article shows that South Africa’s Constitution imports a substantive notion of equality that places a positive obligation on the state to remedy inequality through putting in place contextually appropriate measures. Wealth inequality is a disastrous hallmark of our context and racially demarcated wealth inequality has endured owing to wealth’s self-perpetuating value and intergenerational transferability. This deepens social injustices, undermines other redistribution efforts, and has created a poverty trap for Black South Africans hindering their achievement of equality in the substantive sense. A wealth tax that satisfies minimum thresholds of feasibility can be justifiably introduced given the severity of South Africa’s wealth inequality and the need for any available measure to prevent its worsening. Private persons may justifiably be affected by such redistribution policies, which should take the form of a wealth tax for symbolic and practical reasons and despite legitimate worries of corruption. Furthermore, a wealth tax would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes that there is an equality-laden imperative to introduce a wealth tax in South Africa, without which the Constitution’s promise of an equal society becomes increasingly impossible.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"512 - 534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2090428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract South Africa’s status as the most unequal country in the world unacceptably mocks the Constitution’s promise to achieve an equal society. Positing the introduction of a progressive, recurring, threshold-tested tax on private net wealth holding as a solution to this inequality, this article asks whether there is a constitutional imperative to introduce a wealth tax in South Africa. Arguing in the affirmative, the article situates the debate in the context of the shift in economic policy-making from a focus on labour income to wealth given global economic, political, and social concerns inherent in extremely wealth-unequal societies. The article shows that South Africa’s Constitution imports a substantive notion of equality that places a positive obligation on the state to remedy inequality through putting in place contextually appropriate measures. Wealth inequality is a disastrous hallmark of our context and racially demarcated wealth inequality has endured owing to wealth’s self-perpetuating value and intergenerational transferability. This deepens social injustices, undermines other redistribution efforts, and has created a poverty trap for Black South Africans hindering their achievement of equality in the substantive sense. A wealth tax that satisfies minimum thresholds of feasibility can be justifiably introduced given the severity of South Africa’s wealth inequality and the need for any available measure to prevent its worsening. Private persons may justifiably be affected by such redistribution policies, which should take the form of a wealth tax for symbolic and practical reasons and despite legitimate worries of corruption. Furthermore, a wealth tax would pass constitutional muster. The article concludes that there is an equality-laden imperative to introduce a wealth tax in South Africa, without which the Constitution’s promise of an equal society becomes increasingly impossible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太征税,太征税,还是不够进步?在南非,引入财富税是平等的当务之急
南非是世界上最不平等的国家,这是对宪法所承诺的实现平等社会的嘲弄,令人无法接受。假设对私人净财富持有征收累进的、重复的、门槛测试的税,作为解决这种不平等的办法,本文提出了一个问题,即在南非引入财富税是否符合宪法要求。这篇文章的观点是肯定的,它将辩论置于经济政策制定从关注劳动收入转向关注财富的背景下,因为全球经济、政治和社会问题是极端财富不平等社会所固有的。这篇文章表明,南非宪法引入了一种实质性的平等概念,使国家有积极的义务通过采取适当的措施来纠正不平等。财富不平等是我们环境的一个灾难性标志,由于财富的自我延续价值和代际可转移性,种族划分的财富不平等得以忍受。这加深了社会不公正,破坏了其他再分配努力,并为南非黑人制造了一个贫穷陷阱,阻碍了他们在实质性意义上实现平等。鉴于南非财富不平等的严重程度以及需要采取任何现有措施防止其恶化,可以合理地征收满足可行性最低门槛的财富税。个人有理由受到这种再分配政策的影响,这种再分配政策应该采取财产税的形式,出于象征性和实际的原因,尽管存在对腐败的合理担忧。此外,征收财富税将通过宪法审查。这篇文章的结论是,在南非引入财富税是一种平等的迫切需要,没有财富税,宪法对平等社会的承诺就越来越不可能实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1