The effectiveness of heat therapy and cold therapy in labor pain intensity in primiparous women: A randomized controlled trial

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING Nursing and Midwifery Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/nms.nms_87_21
Mahnaz Didevar, Shahin-Dokht Navvabi-Rigi, Seidamalek Dadkhah
{"title":"The effectiveness of heat therapy and cold therapy in labor pain intensity in primiparous women: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Mahnaz Didevar, Shahin-Dokht Navvabi-Rigi, Seidamalek Dadkhah","doi":"10.4103/nms.nms_87_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Labor pain (LP) is one of the most severe types of pain among women, and hence, effective LP management is a main goal of maternity care. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of heat therapy (HT) and cold therapy (CT) on LP intensity among primiparous women. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2017–2018 on 99 primiparous women purposively selected from a teaching hospital in Iranshahr, Iran. Participants were allocated, through simple randomization, to an HT, a CT, and a control group. Participants in the HT group received HT using a warm-water bottle with a temperature of 38°C–40°C, and participants in the CT group received CT using an ice pack with a temperature of 0°C–5°C. HT and CT were applied to the lumbar area in the first phase of labor and to the perineal and suprapubic areas in the second phase. LP intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale at five time points, namely at a cervical dilation of 4 cm (i.e., before intervention onset), at a cervical dilation of 4–5, 6–7, and 8–9 cm (i.e., during the active labor phase), and in the second stage of labor. The SPSS software (v. 16.0) was used to analyze the data through the Chi-square test, the one-way analysis of variance, and the repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: A total of 93 participants completed the study. There was no significant difference among the groups respecting LP intensity at different measurement time points, except at the cervical dilation of 8–9 cm in which LP intensity in the CT group was significantly less than both the HT and the control groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: CT is effective in significantly reducing LP intensity among primiparous women.","PeriodicalId":45398,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_87_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Labor pain (LP) is one of the most severe types of pain among women, and hence, effective LP management is a main goal of maternity care. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of heat therapy (HT) and cold therapy (CT) on LP intensity among primiparous women. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2017–2018 on 99 primiparous women purposively selected from a teaching hospital in Iranshahr, Iran. Participants were allocated, through simple randomization, to an HT, a CT, and a control group. Participants in the HT group received HT using a warm-water bottle with a temperature of 38°C–40°C, and participants in the CT group received CT using an ice pack with a temperature of 0°C–5°C. HT and CT were applied to the lumbar area in the first phase of labor and to the perineal and suprapubic areas in the second phase. LP intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale at five time points, namely at a cervical dilation of 4 cm (i.e., before intervention onset), at a cervical dilation of 4–5, 6–7, and 8–9 cm (i.e., during the active labor phase), and in the second stage of labor. The SPSS software (v. 16.0) was used to analyze the data through the Chi-square test, the one-way analysis of variance, and the repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: A total of 93 participants completed the study. There was no significant difference among the groups respecting LP intensity at different measurement time points, except at the cervical dilation of 8–9 cm in which LP intensity in the CT group was significantly less than both the HT and the control groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: CT is effective in significantly reducing LP intensity among primiparous women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热疗和冷疗对初产妇分娩疼痛强度的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:分娩疼痛(LP)是女性中最严重的疼痛类型之一,因此,有效的分娩疼痛管理是产妇护理的主要目标。目的:本研究旨在比较热疗法(HT)和冷疗法(CT)对初产妇LP强度的影响。方法:这项随机对照试验于2017年至2018年在伊朗Iranshahr的一家教学医院对99名初产妇进行。通过简单的随机分组,参与者被分配到HT、CT和对照组。HT组的参与者使用温度为38°C–40°C的温水瓶接受HT,CT组的参与者则使用温度为0°C–5°C的冰袋接受CT。HT和CT在分娩的第一阶段应用于腰部区域,在分娩的第二阶段应用于会阴和耻骨上区域。使用视觉模拟量表在五个时间点测量LP强度,即宫颈扩张4 cm时(即干预开始前),宫颈扩张4–5、6–7和8–9 cm时(例如,在主动分娩阶段),以及第二产程。使用SPSS软件(v.16.0)通过卡方检验、单因素方差分析和重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:共有93名参与者完成了这项研究。在不同的测量时间点,各组之间的LP强度没有显著差异,除了在宫颈扩张8–9 cm时,CT组的LP强度显著低于HT组和对照组(P<0.05)。结论:CT可有效降低初产妇女的LP强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived stress and social support in pregnant women during the COVID-19 Pandemic Physical resilience and its related factors in Iranian older adults with ischemic heart disease: A cross-sectional study Psychological well-being and coping strategies of midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A qualitative study The Effects of Nigella sativa and curcumin supplementation on oxidative stress biomarkers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis or osteopenia: A triple-blind factorial randomized controlled trial Effects of ambulation during the first stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1