Thoughts on neurophysiological signal analysis and classification

Junhua Li
{"title":"Thoughts on neurophysiological signal analysis and classification","authors":"Junhua Li","doi":"10.26599/BSA.2020.9050020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neurophysiological signals are crucial intermediaries, through which brain activity can be quantitatively measured and brain mechanisms are able to be revealed. In particular, non‐invasive neurophysiological signals, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), are welcomed and frequently utilised in various studies since these signals can be non‐invasively recorded without harming the human brain while they convey abundant information pertaining to brain activity. The recorded neurophysiological signals are analysed to mine meaningful information for the understanding of brain mechanisms or are classified to distinguish different patterns (e.g., different cognitive states, brain diseases versus healthy controls). To date, remarkable progress has been made in both the analysis and classification of neurophysiological signals, but scholars are not feeling complacent. Consistent effort ought to be paid to advance the research of analysis and classification based on neurophysiological signals. In this paper, I express my thoughts regarding promising future directions in neurophysiological signal analysis and classification based on current developments and accomplishments. I will elucidate the thoughts after brief summaries of relevant backgrounds, accomplishments, and tendencies. According to my personal selection and preference, I mainly focus on brain connectivity, multidimensional array (tensor), multi‐modality, multiple task classification, deep learning, big data, and naturalistic experiment. Hopefully, my thoughts could give a little help to inspire new ideas and contribute to the research of the analysis and classification of neurophysiological signals in some way.","PeriodicalId":67062,"journal":{"name":"Brain Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2020.9050020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Neurophysiological signals are crucial intermediaries, through which brain activity can be quantitatively measured and brain mechanisms are able to be revealed. In particular, non‐invasive neurophysiological signals, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), are welcomed and frequently utilised in various studies since these signals can be non‐invasively recorded without harming the human brain while they convey abundant information pertaining to brain activity. The recorded neurophysiological signals are analysed to mine meaningful information for the understanding of brain mechanisms or are classified to distinguish different patterns (e.g., different cognitive states, brain diseases versus healthy controls). To date, remarkable progress has been made in both the analysis and classification of neurophysiological signals, but scholars are not feeling complacent. Consistent effort ought to be paid to advance the research of analysis and classification based on neurophysiological signals. In this paper, I express my thoughts regarding promising future directions in neurophysiological signal analysis and classification based on current developments and accomplishments. I will elucidate the thoughts after brief summaries of relevant backgrounds, accomplishments, and tendencies. According to my personal selection and preference, I mainly focus on brain connectivity, multidimensional array (tensor), multi‐modality, multiple task classification, deep learning, big data, and naturalistic experiment. Hopefully, my thoughts could give a little help to inspire new ideas and contribute to the research of the analysis and classification of neurophysiological signals in some way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于神经生理学信号分析与分类的思考
神经生理学信号是至关重要的中介,通过它可以定量测量大脑活动,并揭示大脑机制。特别是,非侵入性神经生理学信号,如脑电图(EEG)和功能性磁共振成像(fMRI),在各种研究中受到欢迎并经常使用,因为这些信号可以在不伤害人脑的情况下进行非侵入性记录,同时传递与大脑活动有关的丰富信息。对记录的神经生理学信号进行分析,以挖掘有意义的信息,用于理解大脑机制,或者对其进行分类,以区分不同的模式(例如,不同的认知状态、大脑疾病与健康对照)。迄今为止,在神经生理学信号的分析和分类方面取得了显著进展,但学者们并不自满。应持续努力推进基于神经生理学信号的分析和分类研究。在本文中,我根据目前的发展和成就,表达了我对神经生理学信号分析和分类的未来发展方向的想法。我将在简要总结相关背景、成就和趋势后阐明这些想法。根据我的个人选择和偏好,我主要关注大脑连接、多维阵列(张量)、多模态、多任务分类、深度学习、大数据和自然实验。希望我的想法能对启发新的想法有所帮助,并在某种程度上为神经生理学信号的分析和分类研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A review of deep learning methods for cross-subject rapid serial visual presentation detection in World Robot Contest 2022 Overview of recognition methods for SSVEP-based BCIs in World Robot Contest 2022: MATLAB undergraduate group Algorithm contest of motor imagery BCI in the World Robot Contest 2022: A survey Winning algorithms in BCI Controlled Robot Contest in World Robot Contest 2022: BCI Turing Test Overview of the winning approaches in 2022 World Robot Contest Championship–Asynchronous SSVEP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1