Comparative Analysis of Coal Miner’s Fatalities by Fuzzy Logic

IF 1.1 Q3 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING Journal of Mining and Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-24 DOI:10.22044/JME.2020.9459.1856
Niaz Muhammad Shahani, A. Qureshi
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Coal Miner’s Fatalities by Fuzzy Logic","authors":"Niaz Muhammad Shahani, A. Qureshi","doi":"10.22044/JME.2020.9459.1856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we employ the fuzzy logic technique to achieve and present, for the first time, a proper analysis of the actual intensity of the increase in the coal miners’ fatality rates in Pakistan from 2010 to 2018, compared with China and India, with an objective to minimize the impact of incidents on the miners’ fatalities. The average and yearwise fatality rates in Pakistan, compared with China and India, are used for the fuzzy logic technique in order to calculate the actual degree of flexibility for the surging fatalities. The findings show that both the average (2010-2018) and yearwise fatality rates in 2011, 2015, and 2018 are 2.44, 1.74, and 1.6, respectively. In the fuzzy logic technique, the variables whose membership function (µ) values are ≥ 1 represent the absolute truth. The membership function values for the years 2011, 2015, and 2018 are alarmingly high for the fatalities of coal miners. Similarly, except for 2014 and 2010, where 0 represents the absolute falseness, the results for the remaining years indicate high fatality rates with a flexibility (or small extent) of its corresponding membership function (µ) values such as 0.623, 0.739, 0.219, 0.173 and 0.115, and 0.714, 0.24, 0.01, 0.324 and 0.317 using the average and yearwise analysis, respectively, compared with China. Likewise, the fuzzy logic membership function (µ) values compared with India in the remaining years are 0.704, 0.795, 0.386, 0.159, 0.352 and 0.306, and 0.675, 0.795, 0.386, 0.186, 0.321 and 0.322, respectively. The proposed fuzzy logic analysis has been founded based on the theory of fuzzy sets to properly identify the miners’ fatalities, and also to suggest the implementation of appropriate recommendations to reduce the fatalities in the coal mines in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":45259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mining and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mining and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22044/JME.2020.9459.1856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this work, we employ the fuzzy logic technique to achieve and present, for the first time, a proper analysis of the actual intensity of the increase in the coal miners’ fatality rates in Pakistan from 2010 to 2018, compared with China and India, with an objective to minimize the impact of incidents on the miners’ fatalities. The average and yearwise fatality rates in Pakistan, compared with China and India, are used for the fuzzy logic technique in order to calculate the actual degree of flexibility for the surging fatalities. The findings show that both the average (2010-2018) and yearwise fatality rates in 2011, 2015, and 2018 are 2.44, 1.74, and 1.6, respectively. In the fuzzy logic technique, the variables whose membership function (µ) values are ≥ 1 represent the absolute truth. The membership function values for the years 2011, 2015, and 2018 are alarmingly high for the fatalities of coal miners. Similarly, except for 2014 and 2010, where 0 represents the absolute falseness, the results for the remaining years indicate high fatality rates with a flexibility (or small extent) of its corresponding membership function (µ) values such as 0.623, 0.739, 0.219, 0.173 and 0.115, and 0.714, 0.24, 0.01, 0.324 and 0.317 using the average and yearwise analysis, respectively, compared with China. Likewise, the fuzzy logic membership function (µ) values compared with India in the remaining years are 0.704, 0.795, 0.386, 0.159, 0.352 and 0.306, and 0.675, 0.795, 0.386, 0.186, 0.321 and 0.322, respectively. The proposed fuzzy logic analysis has been founded based on the theory of fuzzy sets to properly identify the miners’ fatalities, and also to suggest the implementation of appropriate recommendations to reduce the fatalities in the coal mines in Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤矿工人死亡人数的模糊逻辑比较分析
在这项工作中,我们采用模糊逻辑技术,首次对巴基斯坦2010年至2018年与中国和印度相比,煤矿工人死亡率增加的实际强度进行了适当的分析,目的是尽量减少事故对矿工死亡的影响。与中国和印度相比,巴基斯坦的平均死亡率和年死亡率被用于模糊逻辑技术,以计算死亡率激增的实际灵活性程度。研究结果显示,2011年、2015年和2018年的平均(2010-2018年)死亡率和年死亡率分别为2.44、1.74和1.6。在模糊逻辑技术中,隶属函数(µ)值≥1的变量代表绝对真理。2011年、2015年和2018年的隶属函数值对于煤矿工人的死亡人数来说是惊人的高。同样,除了2014年和2010年,其中0表示绝对错误,其余年份的结果表明,与中国相比,其相应的隶属函数(µ)值具有灵活性(或小范围),如0.623、0.739、0.219、0.173和0.115,以及0.714、0.24、0.01、0.324和0.317,分别使用平均和年度分析。与印度相比,其余年份的模糊逻辑隶属函数(µ)值分别为0.704、0.795、0.386、0.159、0.352、0.306和0.675、0.795、0.386、0.186、0.321、0.322。在模糊集理论的基础上,建立了模糊逻辑分析方法,对巴基斯坦煤矿事故的死亡人数进行了正确的识别,并提出了相应的建议,以减少巴基斯坦煤矿事故的死亡人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mining and Environment
Journal of Mining and Environment MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fe3O4@TiO2@V2O5 as an efficient magnetic nanoparticle for synthesis of di-indolyl oxindole derivatives Propose a viable stabilization method for slope in weak rock mass environment using numerical modelling: A case study from the cut slopes Estimation of optimum geometric configuration of mine dumps in Wardha valley coalfields in India: a case study An investigation on tailing slurry transport in Kooshk lead-zinc mine in Iran based on non-Newtonian fluid rheology: an experimental study Carnallite Flotation of Khur Biabanak Potash Complex using kimiaflot 619 as a New Collector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1