{"title":"Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises","authors":"Jan Albert Van Laar, E. Krabbe","doi":"10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch\n parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents\n of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing\n reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAIC.18009.LAA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch
parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents
of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing
reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
