More than Tea - Environmental Decay, Administrative Isolation and the Struggle for Identity in Darjeeling

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI:10.22452/mjes.vol59no1.6
Ren Yu, Qianyi Wang, K. Cheong
{"title":"More than Tea - Environmental Decay, Administrative Isolation and the Struggle for Identity in Darjeeling","authors":"Ren Yu, Qianyi Wang, K. Cheong","doi":"10.22452/mjes.vol59no1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The victim of both geographical, historical and administrative isolation, Darjeeling owed its growth to tea cultivation in the hills by migrants from neighbouring Nepal collectively called Gorkhas. Their contributions notwithstanding, they felt discriminated by West Bengal’s residents to whose state they were administratively attached. Poverty and poor working conditions, with no voice in the tea estates, and poorly maintained infrastructure that brought frequent landslides have fuelled demands for “Gorkhaland”, a homeland separate from West Bengal, where the distinctiveness of their identity and their role as Indian citizens would be fully recognised. It did not help that the Darjeeling district had been administratively detached from the political mainstream. Periodic agitations against the state government have weakened local institutions, disrupted the local economy impacting adversely tea production and tourism on which the local economy and the Gorkhas depend. The West Bengal government had partly recognised Gorkha demands by establishing the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council and the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA) each vested with limited autonomy. But disagreements on autonomy have left the Gorkhaland issue unresolved. In the meantime, Darjeeling continues to experience gradual decay, absent adequate support from the West Bengal government and from Darjeeling’s local government, including the GTA itself.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol59no1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The victim of both geographical, historical and administrative isolation, Darjeeling owed its growth to tea cultivation in the hills by migrants from neighbouring Nepal collectively called Gorkhas. Their contributions notwithstanding, they felt discriminated by West Bengal’s residents to whose state they were administratively attached. Poverty and poor working conditions, with no voice in the tea estates, and poorly maintained infrastructure that brought frequent landslides have fuelled demands for “Gorkhaland”, a homeland separate from West Bengal, where the distinctiveness of their identity and their role as Indian citizens would be fully recognised. It did not help that the Darjeeling district had been administratively detached from the political mainstream. Periodic agitations against the state government have weakened local institutions, disrupted the local economy impacting adversely tea production and tourism on which the local economy and the Gorkhas depend. The West Bengal government had partly recognised Gorkha demands by establishing the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council and the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA) each vested with limited autonomy. But disagreements on autonomy have left the Gorkhaland issue unresolved. In the meantime, Darjeeling continues to experience gradual decay, absent adequate support from the West Bengal government and from Darjeeling’s local government, including the GTA itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
茶之外——环境衰退、行政孤立与大吉岭的身份斗争
大吉岭是地理、历史和行政孤立的受害者,它的发展归功于来自邻国尼泊尔的移民(统称为廓尔喀人)在山区种植茶叶。尽管他们做出了贡献,但他们感到受到了西孟加拉邦居民的歧视。贫困和恶劣的工作条件,在茶园里没有发言权,以及维护不善的基础设施导致频繁的山体滑坡,这些都加剧了对“廓尔喀兰”的需求,这是一个与西孟加拉邦分离的家园,在那里,他们作为印度公民的身份和角色的独特性将得到充分认可。大吉岭地区在行政上脱离了政治主流,这于事无补。对州政府的定期煽动削弱了地方机构,扰乱了当地经济,对当地经济和廓尔喀人所依赖的茶叶生产和旅游业产生了不利影响。西孟加拉邦政府通过成立大吉岭-廓尔喀山委员会和廓尔喀兰领土管理局(GTA),在一定程度上承认了廓尔喀的要求,这两个委员会都拥有有限的自主权。但在自治问题上的分歧使得廓尔喀兰问题没有得到解决。与此同时,由于没有西孟加拉邦政府和大吉岭地方政府(包括GTA本身)的充分支持,大吉岭继续经历着逐渐衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1