Editors' Introduction: Starvation and Genocide

Q3 Social Sciences Genocide Studies International Pub Date : 2017-12-11 DOI:10.3138/GSI.11.1.00
F. Sysyn, H. Theriault
{"title":"Editors' Introduction: Starvation and Genocide","authors":"F. Sysyn, H. Theriault","doi":"10.3138/GSI.11.1.00","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starvation has been used against populations throughout history. Siege warfare of course is partly a tactic of starvation, and settler genocides frequently used destruction of food sources as well as separation of indigenous peoples from food sources as a means of group destruction. Food deprivation was similarly an important tool in the execution of the Holocaust and, as we shall read, a central means of genocide in the Armenian case, the Ukraine Famine (Holodomor), and Cambodia. It is, of course, a primary method in Darfur and elsewhere in Sudan, where direct starvation has claimed many victims and malnutrition has weakened targeted groups and driven them into vulnerable positions that expose them to violence by Janjaweed forces as they search for food, firewood for cooking, etc. That food deprivation can be a means of genocide was clear to Raphael Lemkin and the framers of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. It is a primary example of ‘‘deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,’’ the third form of genocidal action identified in the convention’s definition of genocide. While food deprivation has received consideration in many works on particular genocides, it has only recently claimed broader and deeper theoretical consideration in its own right in the field of Genocide Studies. The concept of ‘‘genocide by attrition’’ that has emerged in the past decade manifests this increased attention on what might be termed ‘‘indirect’’ yet fully intentional methods of destroying a group, including, quite principally, starvation. Recent books such as Rhoda Howard-Hassmann’s State Food Crimes, which is reviewed in this issue, offer important new insights and research on the topic. In recognition of the increasing attention to the topic as well as the need for further research, the editors have devoted the current issue of Genocide Studies International to the role of starvation in genocide. This journal issue owes a special debt to the symposium ‘‘Starvation as a Political Tool from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century,’’ which examined four case studies (the Irish Famine, the Armenian Genocide, the Ukrainian Holodomor, and genocide by attrition in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan) to shed light on the politics of starvation, examining methods, their effectiveness as instruments of government policy, and the devastating effects on target populations. The symposium, held at the University of Toronto on 22 October 2015, was co-organized by the International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies and the Holodomor Research and Education Consortium (HREC) of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"11 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.11.1.00","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starvation has been used against populations throughout history. Siege warfare of course is partly a tactic of starvation, and settler genocides frequently used destruction of food sources as well as separation of indigenous peoples from food sources as a means of group destruction. Food deprivation was similarly an important tool in the execution of the Holocaust and, as we shall read, a central means of genocide in the Armenian case, the Ukraine Famine (Holodomor), and Cambodia. It is, of course, a primary method in Darfur and elsewhere in Sudan, where direct starvation has claimed many victims and malnutrition has weakened targeted groups and driven them into vulnerable positions that expose them to violence by Janjaweed forces as they search for food, firewood for cooking, etc. That food deprivation can be a means of genocide was clear to Raphael Lemkin and the framers of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. It is a primary example of ‘‘deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,’’ the third form of genocidal action identified in the convention’s definition of genocide. While food deprivation has received consideration in many works on particular genocides, it has only recently claimed broader and deeper theoretical consideration in its own right in the field of Genocide Studies. The concept of ‘‘genocide by attrition’’ that has emerged in the past decade manifests this increased attention on what might be termed ‘‘indirect’’ yet fully intentional methods of destroying a group, including, quite principally, starvation. Recent books such as Rhoda Howard-Hassmann’s State Food Crimes, which is reviewed in this issue, offer important new insights and research on the topic. In recognition of the increasing attention to the topic as well as the need for further research, the editors have devoted the current issue of Genocide Studies International to the role of starvation in genocide. This journal issue owes a special debt to the symposium ‘‘Starvation as a Political Tool from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century,’’ which examined four case studies (the Irish Famine, the Armenian Genocide, the Ukrainian Holodomor, and genocide by attrition in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan) to shed light on the politics of starvation, examining methods, their effectiveness as instruments of government policy, and the devastating effects on target populations. The symposium, held at the University of Toronto on 22 October 2015, was co-organized by the International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies and the Holodomor Research and Education Consortium (HREC) of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编者简介:饥饿和种族灭绝
纵观历史,饥饿一直被用来对付人口。围攻战当然在一定程度上是一种饥饿策略,定居者的种族灭绝经常利用破坏食物来源以及将土著人民与食物来源分离作为群体毁灭的手段。同样,剥夺粮食也是执行大屠杀的一个重要工具,正如我们将读到的,它也是亚美尼亚事件、乌克兰饥荒(Holodomor)和柬埔寨种族灭绝的主要手段。当然,在达尔富尔和苏丹其他地方,这是一种主要的方法,在那里,直接饥饿夺去了许多受害者,营养不良削弱了目标群体,使他们处于脆弱的地位,使他们在寻找食物、柴火做饭等时,暴露在金戈威德部队的暴力之下。对拉斐尔·莱姆金(Raphael Lemkin)和《联合国防止及惩治灭绝种族罪公约》(UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of genocide Crime)的起草人来说,剥夺食物可以成为种族灭绝的一种手段是显而易见的。这是“故意对该群体施加生活条件,以导致其全部或部分肉体毁灭”的主要例子,是公约对种族灭绝的定义中确定的第三种形式的种族灭绝行动。虽然食物剥夺在许多关于特定种族灭绝的著作中得到了考虑,但直到最近才在种族灭绝研究领域要求对其本身进行更广泛和更深入的理论考虑。过去十年中出现的“消耗式种族灭绝”概念表明,人们越来越重视所谓的“间接”但完全是故意的消灭一个群体的方法,主要包括饥饿。最近的一些书,如罗达·霍华德·哈斯曼的《国家食品犯罪》,在本期中进行了回顾,为这个话题提供了重要的新见解和研究。认识到对这一主题的日益关注以及进一步研究的必要性,编辑们将本期《国际种族灭绝研究》专门讨论饥饿在种族灭绝中的作用。本期杂志特别感谢“从19世纪到21世纪作为政治工具的饥饿”专题讨论会,该专题研究了四个案例研究(爱尔兰饥荒、亚美尼亚种族灭绝、乌克兰大饥荒和苏丹努巴山地的消耗性种族灭绝),以阐明饥饿的政治、研究方法、它们作为政府政策工具的有效性以及对目标人群的破坏性影响。研讨会于2015年10月22日在多伦多大学举行,由国际灭绝种族与人权研究所和加拿大乌克兰研究所的大屠杀研究与教育联盟共同组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Armenian Genocide Studies: Development as a Field, Historiographic Appraisal, and the Road Ahead Penal Battalions and Genocidal Warfare: History's Warnings, Wagner's Global Footprint, and Ukraine What Obligation Does the Global Community Have to Prevent Genocide, and What Form(s) Should these Prevention Efforts Take? Quality Genocide Education in American Schools: An Armenian Lens for Hope From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1