Major Causes Assessment of Construction Delays

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management Pub Date : 2020-06-08 DOI:10.2478/jeppm-2020-0020
A. A. Umar, Rashid Khalfan Al Rizeiqi, A. Badr
{"title":"Major Causes Assessment of Construction Delays","authors":"A. A. Umar, Rashid Khalfan Al Rizeiqi, A. Badr","doi":"10.2478/jeppm-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Delays on construction projects constitute a major source of concern due to its associated cost increases and loss of revenue. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), of which Oman is a member, faces huge delays on their projects. Such delays in the GCC were among factors fingered in the collapse of the UK’s Carillion. Despite cultural similarities, substantial variability exists within the GCC construction sector which requires country-specific studies. The quest to understand delay causes results from the need to curtail wastes and adjust to the new regime of low commodity prices. There is a dearth of studies specific to the governorate of Muscat exploring the causes of delays and this study seeks to fill that gap. A structured survey questionnaire was administered at two independent events organized by the RICS and ICE in Muscat. The top causes of delays ranked using the Relative Importance Index (RII) include variation and changes in design, Poor site management and supervision, ineffective planning and scheduling, unclear and inadequate details in drawing, poor qualification of the contractors and technical staff, delay in material delivery, and shortage of labor. Contractors were found to be most likely to cause delays among the 6 categories of sources.","PeriodicalId":53274,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jeppm-2020-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Delays on construction projects constitute a major source of concern due to its associated cost increases and loss of revenue. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), of which Oman is a member, faces huge delays on their projects. Such delays in the GCC were among factors fingered in the collapse of the UK’s Carillion. Despite cultural similarities, substantial variability exists within the GCC construction sector which requires country-specific studies. The quest to understand delay causes results from the need to curtail wastes and adjust to the new regime of low commodity prices. There is a dearth of studies specific to the governorate of Muscat exploring the causes of delays and this study seeks to fill that gap. A structured survey questionnaire was administered at two independent events organized by the RICS and ICE in Muscat. The top causes of delays ranked using the Relative Importance Index (RII) include variation and changes in design, Poor site management and supervision, ineffective planning and scheduling, unclear and inadequate details in drawing, poor qualification of the contractors and technical staff, delay in material delivery, and shortage of labor. Contractors were found to be most likely to cause delays among the 6 categories of sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施工延误的主要原因评估
建设项目的延期是一个主要的问题,因为它带来了成本的增加和收入的损失。阿曼是海湾合作委员会(GCC)成员之一,该委员会的项目面临着巨大的拖延。海湾合作委员会的这种拖延是导致英国Carillion破产的因素之一。尽管文化上有相似之处,但海湾合作委员会建筑部门内部存在很大差异,需要针对具体国家进行研究。对延迟原因的探索源于减少浪费和适应低商品价格新体制的需要。针对马斯喀特省探索延误原因的研究缺乏,本研究试图填补这一空白。在由RICS和ICE在马斯喀特组织的两个独立活动中进行了结构化调查问卷。根据相对重要性指数(Relative Importance Index, RII),导致工程延误的主要原因包括设计的变化和改变、现场管理和监督不力、规划和调度不力、图纸细节不清楚和不充分、承包商和技术人员的资质不高、材料交付延迟以及劳动力短缺。在6类来源中,承包商最有可能造成延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management
Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Condition-based Maintenance Using BIM: A Case Study of Energy Modeling for a Residential Building Comparative Evaluation of Road Safety Level and Geometric Design Consistency Digitalization and Engineering Management for the Next-Era Industries Pandemic Effect on the Industry 4.0 Readiness: A Case Study in Vietnamese Industry Internet of Things (IoT) Impact on Facility Management of Office Buildings: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1