Association of White Matter Disease With Functional Recovery and 90‐Day Outcome After EVT: Beyond Chronological Age

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1161/svin.122.000734
F. Benali, J. Fladt, T. Jaroenngarmsamer, F. Bala, N. Singh, I. Alhabli, J. Ospel, M. Tymianski, Michael D. Hill, M. Goyal, A. Ganesh
{"title":"Association of White Matter Disease With Functional Recovery and 90‐Day Outcome After EVT: Beyond Chronological Age","authors":"F. Benali, J. Fladt, T. Jaroenngarmsamer, F. Bala, N. Singh, I. Alhabli, J. Ospel, M. Tymianski, Michael D. Hill, M. Goyal, A. Ganesh","doi":"10.1161/svin.122.000734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Patients with white matter disease (WMD) – a key marker of cerebral small vessel disease – may have less brain reserve to cope with ischemic injury. The relationship of WMD to functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain. We aim to explore the association between WMD and functional outcome, assessed at multiple time‐points postendovascular thrombectomy.\n \n \n \n In this post hoc analysis, we analyzed noncontrast computed tomography‐imaging from the ESCAPE‐NA1 (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide [NA‐1] in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke) trial and assessed WMD by using the total Fazekas‐score (score range: 0–6). The primary outcome was repeated measurements of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores (i.e., day‐5/discharge, day‐30, and day‐90). Secondary outcome measures were the ordinal‐mRS at 90‐days, 90‐day‐mRS0–2, and 90‐day‐mortality. Mixed‐linear and binary/ordinal logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for age, sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, cortical atrophy, chronic infarctions, stroke laterality, follow‐up infarct volume, and alteplase–nerinetide interaction. Sensitivity analyses were done including only those patients for whom magnetic resonance imaging was available.\n \n \n \n \n We included 1102 patients with noncontrast computed tomography (median age 71, interquartile range: 61–80; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 17, interquartile range: 12–21). The median total Fazekas‐score was 1(interquartile range: 0–2). Out of 1202 patients, 566 had follow‐up magnetic resonance imaging. We observed heterogeneity in functional recovery with varying degrees of WMD‐burden (\n P\n <0.001). Patients with Fazekas=3–6 fared worse at every time‐point after endovascular thrombectomy, compared with patients with Fazekas=0–1. At 30‐days, the adjusted difference of the mean mRS=0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–0.72 and at 90‐days: adjusted difference=0.60 (95% CI, 0.36–0.85). Higher WMD‐burdens were also associated with worse 90‐day mRS (adjusted common odds ratio for Fazekas=3–6 versus 0–1: 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03–1.96). Similar results were found in magnetic resonance imaging‐only sensitivity analyses.\n \n \n \n \n Patients with more WMD showed worse functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy, compared with patients without WMD, even after adjusting for age and chronic disease markers like atrophy and chronic infarctions. These data may further help inform treatment expectations and recovery‐related planning, by using simple visual ratings on routinely acquired noncontrast computed tomography.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients with white matter disease (WMD) – a key marker of cerebral small vessel disease – may have less brain reserve to cope with ischemic injury. The relationship of WMD to functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain. We aim to explore the association between WMD and functional outcome, assessed at multiple time‐points postendovascular thrombectomy. In this post hoc analysis, we analyzed noncontrast computed tomography‐imaging from the ESCAPE‐NA1 (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide [NA‐1] in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke) trial and assessed WMD by using the total Fazekas‐score (score range: 0–6). The primary outcome was repeated measurements of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores (i.e., day‐5/discharge, day‐30, and day‐90). Secondary outcome measures were the ordinal‐mRS at 90‐days, 90‐day‐mRS0–2, and 90‐day‐mortality. Mixed‐linear and binary/ordinal logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for age, sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, cortical atrophy, chronic infarctions, stroke laterality, follow‐up infarct volume, and alteplase–nerinetide interaction. Sensitivity analyses were done including only those patients for whom magnetic resonance imaging was available. We included 1102 patients with noncontrast computed tomography (median age 71, interquartile range: 61–80; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 17, interquartile range: 12–21). The median total Fazekas‐score was 1(interquartile range: 0–2). Out of 1202 patients, 566 had follow‐up magnetic resonance imaging. We observed heterogeneity in functional recovery with varying degrees of WMD‐burden ( P <0.001). Patients with Fazekas=3–6 fared worse at every time‐point after endovascular thrombectomy, compared with patients with Fazekas=0–1. At 30‐days, the adjusted difference of the mean mRS=0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–0.72 and at 90‐days: adjusted difference=0.60 (95% CI, 0.36–0.85). Higher WMD‐burdens were also associated with worse 90‐day mRS (adjusted common odds ratio for Fazekas=3–6 versus 0–1: 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03–1.96). Similar results were found in magnetic resonance imaging‐only sensitivity analyses. Patients with more WMD showed worse functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy, compared with patients without WMD, even after adjusting for age and chronic disease markers like atrophy and chronic infarctions. These data may further help inform treatment expectations and recovery‐related planning, by using simple visual ratings on routinely acquired noncontrast computed tomography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白质疾病与EVT后功能恢复和90天预后的关系:超越时间年龄
白质病(WMD)是大脑小血管疾病的关键标志物,患者应对缺血性损伤的大脑储备可能较少。血管内血栓切除术后WMD与功能恢复的关系尚不确定。我们的目的是探索大规模杀伤性武器与血管内血栓切除术后多个时间点评估的功能结果之间的关系。在这项事后分析中,我们分析了ESCAPE‐NA1(奈林肽[NA‐1]在接受脑卒中血管内血栓切除术的受试者中的安全性和有效性)试验的非光栅计算机断层扫描成像,并使用Fazekas总分(评分范围:0-6)评估了WMD。主要结果是重复测量改良兰金量表(mRS)评分(即第5天/出院、第30天和第90天)。次要结果指标是90天时的顺序mRS、90天的mRS0-2和90天的死亡率。进行混合线性和二元/有序逻辑回归,调整年龄、性别、美国国立卫生研究院基线卒中量表、皮质萎缩、慢性梗死、卒中偏侧性、随访梗死体积和阿替普酶-奈奈肽相互作用。进行了敏感性分析,仅包括磁共振成像可用的患者。我们纳入了1102名非光栅计算机断层扫描患者(中位年龄71岁,四分位数间距:61-80;中位美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表17,四分位间距:12-21)。Fazekas总分中位数为1(四分位间距:0-2)。在1202名患者中,566名患者进行了磁共振成像随访。我们观察到不同程度WMD负荷的功能恢复的异质性(P<0.001)。与Fazekas=0-1的患者相比,Fazekas=3-6的患者在血管内血栓切除术后的每个时间点的表现都更差。在第30天,平均mRS的调整差值=0.47;95%CI,0.22–0.72,90天时:调整后的差异=0.60(95%CI,0.36–0.85)。更高的大规模杀伤性武器负荷也与更差的90天mRS相关(Fazekas的调整后共同优势比为3-6比0-1:1.42;95%CI,1.03–1.96)。仅磁共振成像的敏感性分析也发现了类似的结果。与没有大规模杀伤性武器的患者相比,即使在调整了年龄和萎缩和慢性梗死等慢性疾病标志物后,具有更多大规模杀伤性弹药的患者在血管内血栓切除术后表现出更差的功能恢复。通过对常规获得的非光栅计算机断层扫描进行简单的视觉评级,这些数据可能有助于进一步告知治疗预期和康复相关计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours Can Aneurysm Wall Radiomics Help Predict Rupture Risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1