Value of Neutrophil Lymphocytic Ratio and Platelet Lymphocytic Ratio in Premature Rupture of Membranes for Detection of Subclinical Chorioamnoitis

Shereen B. Elbohoty
{"title":"Value of Neutrophil Lymphocytic Ratio and Platelet Lymphocytic Ratio in Premature Rupture of Membranes for Detection of Subclinical Chorioamnoitis","authors":"Shereen B. Elbohoty","doi":"10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"evaluate neutrophil lymphocytic ratio (N/L) and platelet lymphocytic (P/L) ratio in detection of subclinical Chorioamnoitis in pregnant females suffering from premature rupture of membranes and to compare them with CRP and TLC. Design: Clinical randomized controlled study. Methods: 100 pregnant patients were selected suffering from PROM , and prepared for termination of pregnancy either normal or cesarean , all had no clinical signs of chorioamnoitis , blood markers ( CRP, TL, N/L ratio and P/L ratio) were taken before termination , the results statistically analyzed according to the result of pathological examination of amniotic membrane for detection of early inflammatory signs for chorioamnoitis. Results: There was significant relationship for the P/L ratio and the finding of early chorioamnoitis by pathological examination with P value 0.0004 , however other markers failed to show any significant relationship with early chorioamnoitis , But CRP was found to have a significant relationship with the presence of postpartum complications with P value 0.0003 and other markers had insignificant relationship, There was insignificant relationship with all the four markers with the method of delivery , CRP and TLC had lower specificity in detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis as compared by N/L ratio and P/L ratio , also P/L ratio had the higher sensitivity 85.71% , so by comparing the four markers P/L ratio is the most accurate 90% and N/L ratio had accuracy more than TLC and CRP ( 80%). Conclusion: P/L ratio and N/L ratio are available cheap markers for detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis, and they show more specificity and accuracy than CRP and TLC in detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis, also P/L ration had higher sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":87379,"journal":{"name":"World journal of gynecology & womens health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of gynecology & womens health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

evaluate neutrophil lymphocytic ratio (N/L) and platelet lymphocytic (P/L) ratio in detection of subclinical Chorioamnoitis in pregnant females suffering from premature rupture of membranes and to compare them with CRP and TLC. Design: Clinical randomized controlled study. Methods: 100 pregnant patients were selected suffering from PROM , and prepared for termination of pregnancy either normal or cesarean , all had no clinical signs of chorioamnoitis , blood markers ( CRP, TL, N/L ratio and P/L ratio) were taken before termination , the results statistically analyzed according to the result of pathological examination of amniotic membrane for detection of early inflammatory signs for chorioamnoitis. Results: There was significant relationship for the P/L ratio and the finding of early chorioamnoitis by pathological examination with P value 0.0004 , however other markers failed to show any significant relationship with early chorioamnoitis , But CRP was found to have a significant relationship with the presence of postpartum complications with P value 0.0003 and other markers had insignificant relationship, There was insignificant relationship with all the four markers with the method of delivery , CRP and TLC had lower specificity in detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis as compared by N/L ratio and P/L ratio , also P/L ratio had the higher sensitivity 85.71% , so by comparing the four markers P/L ratio is the most accurate 90% and N/L ratio had accuracy more than TLC and CRP ( 80%). Conclusion: P/L ratio and N/L ratio are available cheap markers for detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis, and they show more specificity and accuracy than CRP and TLC in detection of subclinical chorioamnoitis, also P/L ration had higher sensitivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和血小板-淋巴细胞比率在膜早破中检测亚临床绒毛膜炎的价值
评价中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(N/L)和血小板淋巴细胞比(P/L)在检测胎膜早破孕妇亚临床绒毛膜羊膜炎中的价值,并与CRP和TLC进行比较。设计:临床随机对照研究。方法:选择100例胎膜早破孕妇,准备正常或剖宫产终止妊娠,均无绒毛膜羊膜炎临床体征,终止妊娠前取血液标志物(CRP、TL、N/L比值、P/L比值),根据羊膜病理检查结果进行统计分析,检测绒毛膜羊膜炎早期炎症体征。结果:P/L比值与病理检查发现早期绒毛膜羊膜炎有显著相关性(P值为0.0004),其他指标与早期绒毛膜羊膜炎无显著相关性(P值为0.0003),CRP与产后并发症存在显著相关性(P值为0.0003),其他指标与分娩方式无显著相关性(P值为0.0003)。CRP和TLC检测亚临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的特异性低于N/L和P/L, P/L的敏感性更高,为85.71%,因此比较四种指标P/L的准确率最高,为90%,N/L的准确率高于TLC和CRP(80%)。结论:P/L比值和N/L比值是检测亚临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的一种廉价指标,其检测亚临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的特异性和准确性均高于CRP和TLC, P/L比值的敏感性也较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends and Evolution in Women's Health Workforce in the First Quarter of the 21st Century. Post-Coital Seepage - A Rarely-Discussed, Yet Common Inconvenience for Most Women: A Main Systematic Review For Those with Inadequate Legal Documents, COVID-19 Vaccination Remains Challenging. Histopathological Findings in Symptomatizing Patients After Supracervical Hysterectomy: A Cross Sectional Study Umbilical Vessels Traversing Cervical Os: Vasa Previa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1