{"title":"Ion therapy guideline (Version 2020)","authors":"Qiuning Zhang, L. Kong, Ruifeng Liu, Xiaohu Wang","doi":"10.1002/pro6.1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charged particle radiotherapy can be traced back to 1954 when Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory launched proton therapy. After experimentation with different kinds of particles, including neutrons, mesons, helium ions, and neon ions, the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Japan started using carbon ions for cancer treatment. Proton therapy has the physical advantage of the Bragg peak, which can well realize the high-dose distribution in the tumor target volume and the low-dose distribution in surrounding normal tissue, so proton therapy has found wide applications in the field of ion radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the physical dose distribution and biological characteristics of carbon ions are significantly superior to those of other particles. Compared with the conventional photon radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy stands outwith its favorable radiophysical and biological advantages.1 In the current clinical practice, heavy ion radiotherapymainly refers to the carbon ion radiotherapy. So far, although some textbooks and publications have provided references for standardized applications of ion radiotherapy, there has not yet been any consensus to guide clinical practices. With the rapid development of ion radiotherapy in China, and the increase of proton and heavy ion therapy centers, ion radiotherapy, which serves as a promising radiotherapy technology, has been applicable to more and more indications. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a guideline to guide ion therapy clinical practices based on national circumstances","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pro6.1120","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Charged particle radiotherapy can be traced back to 1954 when Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory launched proton therapy. After experimentation with different kinds of particles, including neutrons, mesons, helium ions, and neon ions, the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Japan started using carbon ions for cancer treatment. Proton therapy has the physical advantage of the Bragg peak, which can well realize the high-dose distribution in the tumor target volume and the low-dose distribution in surrounding normal tissue, so proton therapy has found wide applications in the field of ion radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the physical dose distribution and biological characteristics of carbon ions are significantly superior to those of other particles. Compared with the conventional photon radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy stands outwith its favorable radiophysical and biological advantages.1 In the current clinical practice, heavy ion radiotherapymainly refers to the carbon ion radiotherapy. So far, although some textbooks and publications have provided references for standardized applications of ion radiotherapy, there has not yet been any consensus to guide clinical practices. With the rapid development of ion radiotherapy in China, and the increase of proton and heavy ion therapy centers, ion radiotherapy, which serves as a promising radiotherapy technology, has been applicable to more and more indications. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a guideline to guide ion therapy clinical practices based on national circumstances