Evaluation of Implant Overdenture Retention with Two Different Attachments at 23mm Standard Inter-Implant Distance

R. Emera
{"title":"Evaluation of Implant Overdenture Retention with Two Different Attachments at 23mm Standard Inter-Implant Distance","authors":"R. Emera","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-2(2)-026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Evaluation of implant overdenture retention at 23mm standard inter-implant distance using OT Equator and locator attachments.\n\nMaterials and methods: Twelve completely edentulous patients were selected for this study. For all patients, conventional complete dentures were constructed. Mandibular dentures were replicated into stereolithographic implant placement guide using CBCT. Every participant received 2-implants in the anterior mandibular area with inter-implant distance of 23 mm. After the osseointegration period, the mandibular conventional dentures were converted into implant retained overdentures attached with Locator attachment for (group I) (six patients) and OT Equator attachments for (group II) (six patients). Retention was evaluated for conventional mandibular complete dentures (T0), 3-months (T3) and, 6-months (T6) after overdenture insertion using digital force-meter.\n\nResults: Results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the study groups representing mean retention force (P<0.05) except at T0 (baseline evaluation with conventional dentures) with higher mean values for group I (Locator attachment) than group II (OT Equator attachment).\n\nConclusion: Regarding the limitations of this study:\n\n-Inter-implant distance of 23 mm for 2-implant overdentures could be considered a reliable modality for edentulous mandible.\n\n-Locator attachment may be preferable than OT Equator attachment regarding 2-implant overdenture retention at 23 mm inter-implant distance.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-2(2)-026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of implant overdenture retention at 23mm standard inter-implant distance using OT Equator and locator attachments. Materials and methods: Twelve completely edentulous patients were selected for this study. For all patients, conventional complete dentures were constructed. Mandibular dentures were replicated into stereolithographic implant placement guide using CBCT. Every participant received 2-implants in the anterior mandibular area with inter-implant distance of 23 mm. After the osseointegration period, the mandibular conventional dentures were converted into implant retained overdentures attached with Locator attachment for (group I) (six patients) and OT Equator attachments for (group II) (six patients). Retention was evaluated for conventional mandibular complete dentures (T0), 3-months (T3) and, 6-months (T6) after overdenture insertion using digital force-meter. Results: Results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the study groups representing mean retention force (P<0.05) except at T0 (baseline evaluation with conventional dentures) with higher mean values for group I (Locator attachment) than group II (OT Equator attachment). Conclusion: Regarding the limitations of this study: -Inter-implant distance of 23 mm for 2-implant overdentures could be considered a reliable modality for edentulous mandible. -Locator attachment may be preferable than OT Equator attachment regarding 2-implant overdenture retention at 23 mm inter-implant distance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同附着体在23mm标准种植间距下种植覆盖义齿固位的评价
目的:评价OT赤道和定位器附着体在23mm标准种植间距下种植覆盖义齿固位的效果。材料与方法:选择12例全牙无牙患者作为研究对象。所有患者均采用常规全口义齿。采用CBCT将下颌义齿复制成立体光刻种植体放置指南。每个参与者在下颌前区种植2个种植体,种植体间距为23 mm。在骨整合期结束后,将下颌常规义齿转化为Locator附着体组(1组)和OT赤道附着体组(2组)。采用数字力计对常规下颌全口义齿(T0)、3个月(T3)和6个月(T6)的固位率进行评估。结果:结果显示各组间平均固位力差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),除了T0(常规义齿基线评估),I组(Locator附着体)的平均值高于II组(OT Equator附着体)。结论:考虑到本研究的局限性:对于2种植体覆盖义齿,种植间距离为23mm可以被认为是一种可靠的无牙下颌骨修复方式。-定位器附着体可能比OT赤道附着体更适合2种植体覆盖义齿在23mm种植间的固位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Stress Analysis To Obtain The Tensile Properties of Three Type-1 and Type-3 Collagen Membranes Clinical Dentistry and Oral Cancer Screening A Systematic Review of The Relationship Between Parental Stress and Early Childhood Caries Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy: A Rare Case Report and Review Exploring Periodontics specialty: A Vision for the Future (Opinion)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1