Appyling Maslow's Hierarchy Theory

IF 0.1 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES First Peoples Child & Family Review Pub Date : 2020-05-22 DOI:10.7202/1069540AR
Marlyn Bennett, Corbin Shangreaux
{"title":"Appyling Maslow's Hierarchy Theory","authors":"Marlyn Bennett, Corbin Shangreaux","doi":"10.7202/1069540AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evolved from the outcome of a feedback meeting held between the principle researchers of Cycle II of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and a number of representatives of the First Nations Child and Family Service Agencies (FNCFS Agencies) which participated in Cycle II of the CIS (CIS-2003) and numerous Research Assistants tasked with collecting information from the FNCFS Agencies. The authors present a profile of the historical and contemporary experience of Aboriginal children and families who come into contact with the child welfare system and include a discussion on some of the findings from two analyses that have been conducted on the data from the 1998 Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-1998). An overview of the challenges as well as the positive aspects of the study from the perspectives of the FNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistances is included along with an examination as to why research may not figure prominently among the service priorities of FNCFS Agencies. The strengths of challenges of participating in CIS-2003 provide rich insight into the perspectives of the Research Assistants and FNCFS Agencies who participated in this national study. The paper concludes with recommendations by the FNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistants on how to improve the data collection process with FNCFS Agencies for future Cycles of the Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect.","PeriodicalId":44259,"journal":{"name":"First Peoples Child & Family Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Peoples Child & Family Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1069540AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper evolved from the outcome of a feedback meeting held between the principle researchers of Cycle II of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and a number of representatives of the First Nations Child and Family Service Agencies (FNCFS Agencies) which participated in Cycle II of the CIS (CIS-2003) and numerous Research Assistants tasked with collecting information from the FNCFS Agencies. The authors present a profile of the historical and contemporary experience of Aboriginal children and families who come into contact with the child welfare system and include a discussion on some of the findings from two analyses that have been conducted on the data from the 1998 Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-1998). An overview of the challenges as well as the positive aspects of the study from the perspectives of the FNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistances is included along with an examination as to why research may not figure prominently among the service priorities of FNCFS Agencies. The strengths of challenges of participating in CIS-2003 provide rich insight into the perspectives of the Research Assistants and FNCFS Agencies who participated in this national study. The paper concludes with recommendations by the FNCFS Agencies and the Research Assistants on how to improve the data collection process with FNCFS Agencies for future Cycles of the Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用马斯洛的层次理论
本文源于加拿大报告的虐待和忽视儿童发病率研究(CIS)第二周期的主要研究人员之间举行的反馈会议的结果,加拿大公共卫生署(PHAC)和一些参加独联体第二周期(CIS-2003)的第一民族儿童和家庭服务机构(FNCFS机构)的代表,以及负责从FNCFS各机构收集信息的众多研究助理。作者介绍了接触儿童福利制度的土著儿童和家庭的历史和当代经历,并讨论了对1998年加拿大报告的虐待和忽视儿童事件研究(CIS-1998)数据进行的两次分析的一些结果。从粮安委各机构和研究助理的角度概述了这项研究的挑战和积极方面,并审查了为什么研究可能没有在粮安委机构的服务优先事项中占据突出地位。参加CIS-2003的优势和挑战为参与这项国家研究的研究助理和FNCFS机构的观点提供了丰富的见解。该文件最后由加拿大儿童基金会各机构和研究助理就如何改进与加拿大儿童基金会所进行的数据收集过程提出建议,以供加拿大报告的虐待和忽视儿童事件研究的未来周期使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Child First: Developing a New Youth Justice System A Commentary Against Aboriginal to non-Aboriginal Adoption A Review of the Literature on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Participatory Action Research Are They Really Neglected? A Look at Worker Perceptions of Neglect Through the Eyes of a National Data System Talking about the Aboriginal Community: Child Protection Practitioners’ Views
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1