Paula Garcia Benitez, Carlos Hildebrando Fonseca Zárate, Juan Carlos García Ubaque
{"title":"Regional Intellectual Wealth and Sustainable Development in Colombia","authors":"Paula Garcia Benitez, Carlos Hildebrando Fonseca Zárate, Juan Carlos García Ubaque","doi":"10.14483/22487638.17389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nCONTEXT: There is a growing concern with the economic consumption and unlimited accumulation model because improvement in some parameters implies that others are negatively affected. There is a need for more intellectual wealth, not only oriented towards the market, but also towards engineering and technology.\nMethodology: To measure natural/environmental, human, intellectual, public/institutional, and private wealth, the basic results of the Índice de desarrollo territorial sustentable (IDTS, spanish acronyms) are used, which is formed by 60 variables. With data from the 2000-2010 period, the relationship between the 5 types of wealth and sustainability is analyzed using principal component analysis.\nResults: At the municipal and departmental levels, the direction of the natural and environmental wealth was found to be opposite direction to the other four. The distance between the different types of wealth ended up being important, and it increases with the IDTS.\nConclusions: The development model followed by Colombia is negatively affecting the natural and environmental wealth and as so is unsustainable. Neither research nor innovation are making adequate use of the natural resources at municipal level, and autonomous regional corporations may be ineffective against the inadequate use of this wealth. It is imperative to modify this exploitation model and reduce the distance between the five types of wealth. Although it is necessary to adopt and develop engineering and technology adequate to biodiversity and tropical geography, this is not enough; substantial social and institutional innovation are also needed in the face of a complex, uncertain, and dizzying technological reality, which is also inequitable at the social and interregional scale.\nFinancing: This project was self-funded.\n \n ","PeriodicalId":30372,"journal":{"name":"Tecnura","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tecnura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.17389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract
CONTEXT: There is a growing concern with the economic consumption and unlimited accumulation model because improvement in some parameters implies that others are negatively affected. There is a need for more intellectual wealth, not only oriented towards the market, but also towards engineering and technology.
Methodology: To measure natural/environmental, human, intellectual, public/institutional, and private wealth, the basic results of the Índice de desarrollo territorial sustentable (IDTS, spanish acronyms) are used, which is formed by 60 variables. With data from the 2000-2010 period, the relationship between the 5 types of wealth and sustainability is analyzed using principal component analysis.
Results: At the municipal and departmental levels, the direction of the natural and environmental wealth was found to be opposite direction to the other four. The distance between the different types of wealth ended up being important, and it increases with the IDTS.
Conclusions: The development model followed by Colombia is negatively affecting the natural and environmental wealth and as so is unsustainable. Neither research nor innovation are making adequate use of the natural resources at municipal level, and autonomous regional corporations may be ineffective against the inadequate use of this wealth. It is imperative to modify this exploitation model and reduce the distance between the five types of wealth. Although it is necessary to adopt and develop engineering and technology adequate to biodiversity and tropical geography, this is not enough; substantial social and institutional innovation are also needed in the face of a complex, uncertain, and dizzying technological reality, which is also inequitable at the social and interregional scale.
Financing: This project was self-funded.
摘要背景:经济消费和无限积累模型由于某些参数的改善意味着其他参数的负面影响而受到越来越多的关注。我们需要更多的知识财富,不仅面向市场,而且面向工程和技术。方法:测量自然/环境,人类,智力,公共/机构和私人财富,使用Índice de desarrollo领土可持续(IDTS,西班牙语首字母缩写)的基本结果,由60个变量组成。利用2000-2010年的数据,运用主成分分析法分析了5类财富与可持续性之间的关系。结果:在市级和厅级层面,自然环境财富的发展方向与其他四个方向相反。不同类型的财富之间的距离最终变得很重要,并且随着IDTS的增加而增加。结论:哥伦比亚所遵循的发展模式对自然和环境财富产生了负面影响,因此是不可持续的。无论是研究还是创新都没有充分利用城市一级的自然资源,而自治区的公司可能对这种财富的不充分利用无效。必须修改这种剥削模式,缩小五种财富之间的距离。虽然有必要采用和发展适合生物多样性和热带地理的工程技术,但这还不够;面对复杂、不确定和令人眼花缭乱的技术现实,也需要进行大量的社会和体制创新,这种现实在社会和区域间规模上也是不公平的。资金:本项目为自筹资金。