A New Methodology to Analysis and Predict Shoreline Changes Due to Human Interventions (Case Study: Javad Al-Aemmeh port, Iran)

M. Rezaee, A. Golshani, Hosein Mousavizadegan
{"title":"A New Methodology to Analysis and Predict Shoreline Changes Due to Human Interventions (Case Study: Javad Al-Aemmeh port, Iran)","authors":"M. Rezaee, A. Golshani, Hosein Mousavizadegan","doi":"10.29252/ijmt.12.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article History: Received: 8 Mar. 2019 Accepted: 2 Jul. 2019 In recent years, determining the rate of shoreline change by its historical trend has been reported frequently. This study has focused on shorelines at the adjacency of Javad Al-Aemmeh port which has undergone successive constructions in its region. The decadal trend of studied shoreline change was determined by the historical trend method. A numerical method was also employed to reduce the probable deficiencies concerned to these constructions. Accordingly, for the first time, a framework was developed to compare the results of historical trend and numerical methods with a field-measured value both spatially and quantitatively and based on this comparison, the most suitable rate of change was assigned to each coastal landform. Finally, it was revealed that among the computed rates, the Linear Regression Rate (LRR) from historical trend method has given the best estimation for the shoreline change rate, but in those parts which the shoreline was directly under influence of human interventions the change rate derived from the numerical method has been more accurate. Besides, results showed that at those parts which the Net Shoreline Movement (NSM) and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) are identical, predicting the future position of shoreline by its past trend is more reliable.","PeriodicalId":34429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Maritime Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Maritime Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/ijmt.12.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Article History: Received: 8 Mar. 2019 Accepted: 2 Jul. 2019 In recent years, determining the rate of shoreline change by its historical trend has been reported frequently. This study has focused on shorelines at the adjacency of Javad Al-Aemmeh port which has undergone successive constructions in its region. The decadal trend of studied shoreline change was determined by the historical trend method. A numerical method was also employed to reduce the probable deficiencies concerned to these constructions. Accordingly, for the first time, a framework was developed to compare the results of historical trend and numerical methods with a field-measured value both spatially and quantitatively and based on this comparison, the most suitable rate of change was assigned to each coastal landform. Finally, it was revealed that among the computed rates, the Linear Regression Rate (LRR) from historical trend method has given the best estimation for the shoreline change rate, but in those parts which the shoreline was directly under influence of human interventions the change rate derived from the numerical method has been more accurate. Besides, results showed that at those parts which the Net Shoreline Movement (NSM) and the Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) are identical, predicting the future position of shoreline by its past trend is more reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类活动引起的海岸线变化分析与预测的新方法(以伊朗Javad Al-Aemmeh港为例)
文章历史:接收时间:2019年3月8日接收时间:2020年7月2日近年来,根据历史趋势确定海岸线变化率的报道频繁。本研究的重点是Javad Al Aemmeh港口附近的海岸线,该港口在该地区经历了连续的建设。利用历史趋势法确定了研究海岸线变化的年代趋势。还采用了一种数值方法来减少这些结构可能存在的缺陷。因此,首次开发了一个框架,将历史趋势和数值方法的结果与现场测量值在空间和数量上进行比较,并在此比较的基础上,为每个海岸地貌分配了最合适的变化率。最后,研究表明,在计算的变化率中,历史趋势法的线性回归率(LRR)对海岸线的变化率给出了最好的估计,但在海岸线直接受到人为干预影响的部分,数值方法得出的变化率更准确。此外,结果表明,在净海岸线运动(NSM)和海岸线变化包络线(SCE)相同的部分,通过其过去的趋势预测海岸线的未来位置更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of FPSO’s Mooring System on Dynamic Response and Fatigue Life of Riser Numerical and experimental hydrodynamic analysis of catamaran with and without V-like center bow Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Studies of Gorgan Bay (Case Study: Khozeini Channel and Investigation of Jetty’s Role in Reducing Active Sedimentation After Channel Dredging) Reduction of Effect of Waves Disturbance on Ship Roll Motion by Using Robust Nonlinear Control A new multi-objective model for berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem with speed optimization and air emission considerations (A case study of Rajaee Port in Iran)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1