Improving care for patients in the outlying wards: Lessons from patients' care experience.

Q3 Medicine Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0902
V. Sobolewska, H. Duff, F. Craighead, I. Macpherson, A. Veiraiah, S. Dummer, K. Lockman
{"title":"Improving care for patients in the outlying wards: Lessons from patients' care experience.","authors":"V. Sobolewska, H. Duff, F. Craighead, I. Macpherson, A. Veiraiah, S. Dummer, K. Lockman","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nOvercrowding in hospitals and lack of capacity in general medical wards can result in a medical patient being transferred to other specialty wards often referred as 'outlying' or 'boarding' wards.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nWe explored the experiences of our outlying patients to identify local factors that affect their care experience and inform interventions that could improve their care deliveries and outcomes.\n\n\nDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS\nQualitative interviews using semi-structured questions were conducted in 21 medical patients from a mixture of specialty wards in a large tertiary NHS hospital.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES\nPerceptions of the factors contributing to the experience of being a patient on a boarding ward, and potential solutions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAlmost all participants reported experiences of good care in an outlying ward. Positive comments highlighted good nursing care, restful environment and a strong focus on patient-centred care. However, none of the participants could identify the team or consultant responsible for their care and this was linked to multiple doctors being involved in the patient's care. Participants also perceived that the frequency of review was reduced and occurred much later in the day than that experienced in the medical ward. Most felt indifferent about the care ownership, timing and frequency of review but in some cases, this led to confusion and the perception of poor progress. Further, participants felt that they had to actively seek information relating to clinical progress. Negative experience of discharge planning was also reported. The associated themes included conflicting information and delays in social care provision. This led to anxiety, frustration and the perception of being a barrier to patient flow.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE\nPatient experience of the outlying ward is positive, and this can provide a foundation for improvement. Our findings suggest that better care processes and improved communication are needed to promote equity and quality of care. However, this should be complemented with efforts to overcome wider challenges that affect the entire continuum of flow within the healthcare system.","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"21 2 1","pages":"80-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Overcrowding in hospitals and lack of capacity in general medical wards can result in a medical patient being transferred to other specialty wards often referred as 'outlying' or 'boarding' wards. OBJECTIVES We explored the experiences of our outlying patients to identify local factors that affect their care experience and inform interventions that could improve their care deliveries and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Qualitative interviews using semi-structured questions were conducted in 21 medical patients from a mixture of specialty wards in a large tertiary NHS hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Perceptions of the factors contributing to the experience of being a patient on a boarding ward, and potential solutions. RESULTS Almost all participants reported experiences of good care in an outlying ward. Positive comments highlighted good nursing care, restful environment and a strong focus on patient-centred care. However, none of the participants could identify the team or consultant responsible for their care and this was linked to multiple doctors being involved in the patient's care. Participants also perceived that the frequency of review was reduced and occurred much later in the day than that experienced in the medical ward. Most felt indifferent about the care ownership, timing and frequency of review but in some cases, this led to confusion and the perception of poor progress. Further, participants felt that they had to actively seek information relating to clinical progress. Negative experience of discharge planning was also reported. The associated themes included conflicting information and delays in social care provision. This led to anxiety, frustration and the perception of being a barrier to patient flow. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patient experience of the outlying ward is positive, and this can provide a foundation for improvement. Our findings suggest that better care processes and improved communication are needed to promote equity and quality of care. However, this should be complemented with efforts to overcome wider challenges that affect the entire continuum of flow within the healthcare system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善边远病区患者护理:来自患者护理经验的教训。
重要性医院过度拥挤和普通病房容量不足可能导致病人被转移到其他专科病房,通常被称为“边远”或“寄宿”病房。目的:我们探讨边远地区患者的经历,以确定影响其护理体验的当地因素,并告知可以改善其护理交付和结果的干预措施。设计、环境和参与者采用半结构化问题对来自一家大型三级NHS医院混合专科病房的21名患者进行了定性访谈。主要结果和测量对住院病人体验的影响因素的看法,以及可能的解决方案。结果几乎所有的参与者都报告了在偏远病房的良好护理经历。积极的评价强调了良好的护理、宁静的环境和以病人为中心的护理。然而,没有一个参与者能够确定负责他们护理的团队或顾问,这与参与患者护理的多名医生有关。参与者还认为,审查的频率减少了,而且比在医疗病房中经历的要晚得多。大多数人对护理所有权、时间和审查频率感到漠不关心,但在某些情况下,这导致了混乱和进展不佳的感觉。此外,参与者认为他们必须积极寻求与临床进展有关的信息。也报告了出院计划方面的消极经验。相关主题包括相互矛盾的信息和社会保健服务的延误。这导致了焦虑、沮丧和患者流动障碍的感觉。结论及相关结论:边远病区的患者体验是积极的,可为今后的改进提供基础。我们的研究结果表明,需要更好的护理流程和改善沟通,以促进公平和护理质量。然而,这应该与努力克服影响医疗保健系统内整个连续流动的更广泛挑战相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine
Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of an atypical small bowel obstruction in a cannabis user: a case report. Editorial - Acute Medical Care: "Exit block". Improving Telemetry use in the Acute Assessment Unit. Point of Care Ultrasound Bladder Volume Calculation on the Acute Medical Unit. Evaluating dynamic patterns in mortality before and after reconfiguration of the Danish emergency healthcare system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1