Refugee Artists, Architects and Intellectuals Beyond Europe in the 1930s and 1940s: Experiences of Exile in Istanbul and Bombay

IF 0.2 0 ARCHITECTURE ABE Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-28 DOI:10.4000/ABE.5949
Burcu Dogramaci, Rachel Lee
{"title":"Refugee Artists, Architects and Intellectuals Beyond Europe in the 1930s and 1940s: Experiences of Exile in Istanbul and Bombay","authors":"Burcu Dogramaci, Rachel Lee","doi":"10.4000/ABE.5949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article follows the hypothesis that the migration movements of artists, architects and intellectuals in the first half of the twentieth century had a profound and long-term impact on art and architectural production and history. During the first half of the twentieth century artists, architects and intellectuals from Europe sought refuge in global metropolises. As hubs of globalizing modernism these cities were places of entrance, transition and creativity for people fleeing their native countries due to changes in political systems, dictatorships and wars, repression, persecution and violence. In the metropolises new transcultural places of artistic encounter were established. Flight, exile and migration brought artistic and architectural concepts, objects and actors around the world into contact, resulting in transformations that are legible in the topographies and structures of cities, particularly in the ”target“ cities. Their urban topographies contain neighbourhoods, places and spaces that were populated, frequented and run by migrants. In addition to providing the migrants with income, employment and exposure, urban institutions, academies, associations and museums were crucial settings for interaction and exchange between the local and migrant populations. In the following we discuss preliminary findings on the connections between exile, modernism and the urban environment in Istanbul and Bombay (now Mumbai). The essay draws on ongoing research from the European Research Council funded project Relocating Modernism. Global Metropolises, Modern Art and Exile (Metromod).","PeriodicalId":41296,"journal":{"name":"ABE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ABE.5949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article follows the hypothesis that the migration movements of artists, architects and intellectuals in the first half of the twentieth century had a profound and long-term impact on art and architectural production and history. During the first half of the twentieth century artists, architects and intellectuals from Europe sought refuge in global metropolises. As hubs of globalizing modernism these cities were places of entrance, transition and creativity for people fleeing their native countries due to changes in political systems, dictatorships and wars, repression, persecution and violence. In the metropolises new transcultural places of artistic encounter were established. Flight, exile and migration brought artistic and architectural concepts, objects and actors around the world into contact, resulting in transformations that are legible in the topographies and structures of cities, particularly in the ”target“ cities. Their urban topographies contain neighbourhoods, places and spaces that were populated, frequented and run by migrants. In addition to providing the migrants with income, employment and exposure, urban institutions, academies, associations and museums were crucial settings for interaction and exchange between the local and migrant populations. In the following we discuss preliminary findings on the connections between exile, modernism and the urban environment in Istanbul and Bombay (now Mumbai). The essay draws on ongoing research from the European Research Council funded project Relocating Modernism. Global Metropolises, Modern Art and Exile (Metromod).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪30年代和40年代欧洲以外的难民艺术家、建筑师和知识分子:流亡伊斯坦布尔和孟买的经历
本文遵循的假设是,20世纪上半叶艺术家、建筑师和知识分子的移民运动对艺术和建筑生产和历史产生了深远而长期的影响。在20世纪上半叶,来自欧洲的艺术家、建筑师和知识分子在全球大都市寻求庇护。作为全球化现代主义的中心,这些城市是由于政治制度、独裁和战争、镇压、迫害和暴力的变化而逃离祖国的人们进入、过渡和创造的地方。在大都市中建立了新的跨文化艺术相遇场所。逃亡、流放和移民使世界各地的艺术和建筑概念、物体和行动者相互接触,导致城市的地形和结构发生了明显的变化,特别是在“目标”城市。它们的城市地形包含了移民居住、经常光顾和经营的社区、场所和空间。除了为移民提供收入、就业和接触外,城市机构、学院、协会和博物馆是当地人口和移民人口之间互动和交流的重要场所。在接下来的文章中,我们将讨论伊斯坦布尔和孟买(现在的孟买)的流亡、现代主义和城市环境之间联系的初步发现。本文借鉴了欧洲研究委员会资助的“重新定位现代主义”项目正在进行的研究。全球大都市,现代艺术和流亡(Metromod)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ABE Journal
ABE Journal ARCHITECTURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Actors of Archival Building Documentation in Early Republican Turkey Introduction La ville et l’architecture européennes du XIXe siècle dans la Casbah d’Alger. Transformation et construction : entre liberté et idéal esthétique “Ecologically camping, eating, drinking wine.” Material and knowledge flows in the Minimum Cost Housing Group’s ECOL Operation, 1971-76 The Case for Self-Education. The Self-Help Manuals of the Communication Centre of Scientific Knowledge for Self-Reliance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1