Copular constructions, existentials and related phenomena. An introduction

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Review Pub Date : 2019-07-10 DOI:10.1515/tlr-2019-2046
Francesca Ramaglia, M. Frascarelli
{"title":"Copular constructions, existentials and related phenomena. An introduction","authors":"Francesca Ramaglia, M. Frascarelli","doi":"10.1515/tlr-2019-2046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existential constructions (ECs) represent an important and ‘ever-green’ area of research, as the definition of their properties and the explanation of their related effects still remain controversial in the literature. Furthermore, given the relevance and interface extent of the phenomena connected to ECs, a modular investigation can shed new light on the functioning of natural language (including cognitive aspects), as well as on the nature of predication and the information-structural (IS) quality of marked constructions. This is exactly the objective of the discussion raised by the papers included in this Special Issue of The Linguistic Review. In this respect, among the themes dealt with in the present volume major questions can be listed as follows: – What determines the so-called Definiteness Effect (DE) (a restriction on the acceptability of definite DPs in the post-copular position of existential sentences), its impact and consistency across and within languages? Can this phenomenon be treated as (uniquely) determined by the presence of there? – What is the relationship (if any) between EC formulas and possessive structures across and within languages (e.g. the alternation between there beand have-sentences in English)? – Does the root/non-root distinction play a role in the definition of EC’s related phenomena? – What properties and functions (if any) distinguish existential from locative predications? And, in case, why, and to what extent do languages differ in the encoding of their meanings? – To what extent are ECs related to other (copular) structures, possibly sharing features at different levels of analysis, crossand intra-linguistically? – Finally, how and to what extent are ECs connected with discourse-related IS phenomena?","PeriodicalId":46358,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"173 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tlr-2019-2046","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Existential constructions (ECs) represent an important and ‘ever-green’ area of research, as the definition of their properties and the explanation of their related effects still remain controversial in the literature. Furthermore, given the relevance and interface extent of the phenomena connected to ECs, a modular investigation can shed new light on the functioning of natural language (including cognitive aspects), as well as on the nature of predication and the information-structural (IS) quality of marked constructions. This is exactly the objective of the discussion raised by the papers included in this Special Issue of The Linguistic Review. In this respect, among the themes dealt with in the present volume major questions can be listed as follows: – What determines the so-called Definiteness Effect (DE) (a restriction on the acceptability of definite DPs in the post-copular position of existential sentences), its impact and consistency across and within languages? Can this phenomenon be treated as (uniquely) determined by the presence of there? – What is the relationship (if any) between EC formulas and possessive structures across and within languages (e.g. the alternation between there beand have-sentences in English)? – Does the root/non-root distinction play a role in the definition of EC’s related phenomena? – What properties and functions (if any) distinguish existential from locative predications? And, in case, why, and to what extent do languages differ in the encoding of their meanings? – To what extent are ECs related to other (copular) structures, possibly sharing features at different levels of analysis, crossand intra-linguistically? – Finally, how and to what extent are ECs connected with discourse-related IS phenomena?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共形结构、存在论和相关现象。简介
存在结构(EC)是一个重要的“绿色”研究领域,因为其性质的定义和相关影响的解释在文献中仍然存在争议。此外,考虑到与EC相关的现象的相关性和界面程度,模块化调查可以对自然语言的功能(包括认知方面),以及预测的性质和标记结构的信息结构(IS)质量提供新的线索。这正是本期《语言学评论》特刊所载论文所提出的讨论目的。在这方面,在本卷涉及的主题中,主要问题可以列出如下:是什么决定了所谓的确定效应(DE)(在存在句的后系词位置对确定DP的可接受性的限制),它在语言之间和语言内部的影响和一致性?这种现象是否可以被视为(唯一的)由其存在决定跨语言和语言内部的EC公式和所有格结构之间的关系(如果有的话)是什么根/非根的区别在EC相关现象的定义中是否发挥作用存在谓词和位置谓词的区别是什么性质和功能(如果有的话)?那么,在这种情况下,语言在含义编码方面为什么以及在多大程度上存在差异EC在多大程度上与其他(系词)结构相关,可能在不同的分析水平上共享特征,跨语言和跨语言最后,EC是如何以及在多大程度上与话语相关的IS现象联系在一起的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Review
Linguistic Review Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Linguistic Review aims at publishing high-quality papers in syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, within a framework of Generative Grammar and related disciplines, as well as critical discussions of theoretical linguistics as a branch of cognitive psychology. Striving to be a platform for discussion, The Linguistic Review welcomes reviews of important new monographs in these areas, dissertation abstracts, and letters to the editor. The editor also welcomes initiatives for thematic issues with guest editors. The Linguistic Review is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope.
期刊最新文献
Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese Morphological analysis of alienability contrast in Nuer: an atypical typical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1