Favipiravir: A Possible Pharmaceutical Treatment for COVID-19

IF 0.6 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.14740/jem645
H. Yanai
{"title":"Favipiravir: A Possible Pharmaceutical Treatment for COVID-19","authors":"H. Yanai","doi":"10.14740/jem645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reached a pandemic level. There is an urgent need for effective treatment. Currently, there is not any specific effective antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy for COVID-19. At present, various antiviral and immunomodulating agents are in various stages of evaluation for COVID-19. The frequently used agents all over the world include chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir and remdesivir [1]. SARS-CoV-2 genome-based specific vaccines and therapeutic antibodies are currently being tested; however, we need more time to use such vaccines and antibodies. The existing therapeutic agents previously designed for other virus infections and pathologies attract attention because most of these agents have already been tested for their safety. These agents can be divided into two broad categories, those that can directly target the virus replication, and those based on immunotherapy which improves damage induced by inflammatory responses [2]. The initial clinical studies indicated the promising therapeutic potential of favipiravir, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that interferes with the viral replication [2]. Here, I describe possible effects of favipiravir for COVID-19. Favipiravir plays as an inhibitor of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by structurally resembling the endogenous guanine [3]. Through competitive inhibition, the efficacy of viral replication can be largely reduced. Favipiravir has been shown to be effective in the treatment of influenza and Ebola virus [3-5]. Very recently, Wang et al showed that favipiravir was effective in reducing the SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro [6]. In March 2020, favipiravir was approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China as the first anti-COVID-19 drug in China, because the clinical trial had demonstrated efficacy with minimal side effects. Chen et al conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, openlabel multicenter trial involving adult patients with COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000030254) [7]. Patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional therapy plus favipiravir or arbidol which is a broad-spectrum antiviral compound that blocks viral fusion [8], for 10 days. Two hundred forty enrolled COVID-19 patients underwent randomization; 120 patients were assigned to receive favipiravir, and 120 to receive arbidol. Favipiravir led to shorter latencies to relief for both pyrexia by 1.70 days (P < 0.0001) and cough by 1.75 days (P < 0.0001). However, no difference was observed of the rate of auxiliary oxygen therapy or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. The most frequently observed favipiravir-associated adverse event was elevation of serum uric acid. Cai et al performed an open-label control study to evaluate experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19 [9]. Patients were assigned to receive oral favipiravir plus interferon-α aerosol inhalation (n = 35), or receive lopinavir/ ritonavir which is a fixed-dose protease inhibitor combination used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) [10] plus interferon-α aerosol inhalation (n = 45). A viral clearance time was significantly shorter in the favipiravir arm than the lopinavir/ritonavir arm by 7 days (median value). Further, multivariable Cox regression showed that favipiravir was independently associated with faster viral clearance. The favipiravir arm also showed significant improvement in chest imaging compared with the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, with an improvement rate of 91.43% versus 62.22% at day 4 after treatment. Total number of adverse reactions in the favipiravir group (n = 4, 11.4%) was significantly smaller than the lopinavir/ritonavir group (n = 25, 55.56%). Nausea was significantly more frequent in the lopinavir/ritonavir group than the favipiravir group, and vomiting tended to be frequent in the lopinavir/ritonavir group than the favipiravir group. The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases reported an elderly patient (Ishikawa et al) or a hemodialysis patient (Saito et al), whose COVID-19 pneumonia was alleviated by favipiravir as the case reports on their homepage [11]. The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases also reported that an improvement was observed in 90%, 85% and 61%, after 14 days from the start of favipiravir, in mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively, on their web symposium. Favipiravir may be a relatively safe and effective drug for COVID-19 at present. We have to work together to combat and win against COVID-19, regardless of our medical specialty. We will get a great victory against COVID-19 in the near future.","PeriodicalId":15712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"10 1","pages":"33-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jem645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reached a pandemic level. There is an urgent need for effective treatment. Currently, there is not any specific effective antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy for COVID-19. At present, various antiviral and immunomodulating agents are in various stages of evaluation for COVID-19. The frequently used agents all over the world include chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir and remdesivir [1]. SARS-CoV-2 genome-based specific vaccines and therapeutic antibodies are currently being tested; however, we need more time to use such vaccines and antibodies. The existing therapeutic agents previously designed for other virus infections and pathologies attract attention because most of these agents have already been tested for their safety. These agents can be divided into two broad categories, those that can directly target the virus replication, and those based on immunotherapy which improves damage induced by inflammatory responses [2]. The initial clinical studies indicated the promising therapeutic potential of favipiravir, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that interferes with the viral replication [2]. Here, I describe possible effects of favipiravir for COVID-19. Favipiravir plays as an inhibitor of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by structurally resembling the endogenous guanine [3]. Through competitive inhibition, the efficacy of viral replication can be largely reduced. Favipiravir has been shown to be effective in the treatment of influenza and Ebola virus [3-5]. Very recently, Wang et al showed that favipiravir was effective in reducing the SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro [6]. In March 2020, favipiravir was approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China as the first anti-COVID-19 drug in China, because the clinical trial had demonstrated efficacy with minimal side effects. Chen et al conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, openlabel multicenter trial involving adult patients with COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000030254) [7]. Patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional therapy plus favipiravir or arbidol which is a broad-spectrum antiviral compound that blocks viral fusion [8], for 10 days. Two hundred forty enrolled COVID-19 patients underwent randomization; 120 patients were assigned to receive favipiravir, and 120 to receive arbidol. Favipiravir led to shorter latencies to relief for both pyrexia by 1.70 days (P < 0.0001) and cough by 1.75 days (P < 0.0001). However, no difference was observed of the rate of auxiliary oxygen therapy or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. The most frequently observed favipiravir-associated adverse event was elevation of serum uric acid. Cai et al performed an open-label control study to evaluate experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19 [9]. Patients were assigned to receive oral favipiravir plus interferon-α aerosol inhalation (n = 35), or receive lopinavir/ ritonavir which is a fixed-dose protease inhibitor combination used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) [10] plus interferon-α aerosol inhalation (n = 45). A viral clearance time was significantly shorter in the favipiravir arm than the lopinavir/ritonavir arm by 7 days (median value). Further, multivariable Cox regression showed that favipiravir was independently associated with faster viral clearance. The favipiravir arm also showed significant improvement in chest imaging compared with the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, with an improvement rate of 91.43% versus 62.22% at day 4 after treatment. Total number of adverse reactions in the favipiravir group (n = 4, 11.4%) was significantly smaller than the lopinavir/ritonavir group (n = 25, 55.56%). Nausea was significantly more frequent in the lopinavir/ritonavir group than the favipiravir group, and vomiting tended to be frequent in the lopinavir/ritonavir group than the favipiravir group. The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases reported an elderly patient (Ishikawa et al) or a hemodialysis patient (Saito et al), whose COVID-19 pneumonia was alleviated by favipiravir as the case reports on their homepage [11]. The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases also reported that an improvement was observed in 90%, 85% and 61%, after 14 days from the start of favipiravir, in mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively, on their web symposium. Favipiravir may be a relatively safe and effective drug for COVID-19 at present. We have to work together to combat and win against COVID-19, regardless of our medical specialty. We will get a great victory against COVID-19 in the near future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法维匹拉韦:新冠肺炎的可能药物治疗
导致2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARSCoV-2)已达到大流行水平。迫切需要有效的治疗。目前,没有任何针对COVID-19的有效抗病毒治疗方法。支持性护理仍然是COVID-19治疗的主要手段。目前,各种抗病毒和免疫调节剂对COVID-19的疗效处于不同的评估阶段。国际上常用的药物包括氯喹、羟氯喹、洛匹那韦/利托那韦、法匹拉韦和瑞德西韦等。目前正在测试基于SARS-CoV-2基因组的特异性疫苗和治疗性抗体;然而,我们需要更多的时间来使用这些疫苗和抗体。先前为其他病毒感染和病理设计的现有治疗剂引起了人们的注意,因为这些药物中的大多数已经经过了安全性测试。这些药物可分为两大类,一类是直接针对病毒复制的药物,另一类是基于免疫疗法的药物,后者可改善炎症反应引起的损伤。初步临床研究表明,favipiravir是一种干扰病毒复制的广谱抗病毒药物,具有良好的治疗潜力。在这里,我描述了法匹拉韦对COVID-19可能产生的影响。Favipiravir作为RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶的抑制剂,其结构类似于内源性鸟嘌呤[3]。通过竞争性抑制,病毒复制的功效可以大大降低。Favipiravir已被证明可有效治疗流感和埃博拉病毒[3-5]。最近,Wang等人发现favipiravir在体外可有效减少SARS-CoV-2感染。2020年3月,法匹拉韦被中国国家药品监督管理局批准为中国首个抗covid -19药物,因为临床试验证明疗效好,副作用小。Chen等人进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照、开放标签的多中心试验,纳入了成年COVID-19患者(ChiCTR2000030254)。患者被随机分配接受常规治疗加favipiravir或arbidol,后者是一种广谱抗病毒化合物,可阻断病毒融合[8],为期10天。240名入组的COVID-19患者进行了随机分组;120例患者接受favipiravir治疗,120例接受阿比多尔治疗。Favipiravir使发热缓解时间缩短了1.70天(P < 0.0001),咳嗽缓解时间缩短了1.75天(P < 0.0001)。然而,辅助氧疗和无创机械通气的比率没有差异。最常见的favipirvir相关不良事件是血清尿酸升高。Cai等人进行了一项开放标签对照研究,以评估favipiravir对COVID-19[9]的实验性治疗。患者被分配接受口服favipiravir +干扰素-α气溶胶吸入(n = 35),或接受洛匹那韦/利托那韦,这是一种固定剂量的蛋白酶抑制剂组合,用于治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒1 (HIV-1)[10] +干扰素-α气溶胶吸入(n = 45)。favipiravir组的病毒清除时间明显比洛匹那韦/利托那韦组短7天(中位数)。此外,多变量Cox回归显示favipiravir与更快的病毒清除独立相关。与洛匹那韦/利托那韦组相比,favipiravir组在胸部成像方面也有显著改善,治疗后第4天的改善率为91.43%,而非62.22%。favipiravir组总不良反应数(n = 4, 11.4%)显著小于洛匹那韦/利托那韦组(n = 25, 55.56%)。洛匹那韦/利托那韦组恶心发生率明显高于法匹那韦组,洛匹那韦/利托那韦组呕吐发生率高于法匹那韦组。日本传染病协会在其网站[11]上报道了1例老年患者(Ishikawa et al)或1例血液透析患者(Saito et al)使用favipiravir缓解COVID-19肺炎的病例报告。日本传染病协会也在其网络研讨会上报告说,在开始使用favipiravir 14天后,在轻度、中度和重度COVID-19病例中分别观察到90%、85%和61%的改善。法匹拉韦可能是目前治疗COVID-19相对安全有效的药物。无论我们的医学专业如何,我们都必须共同努力,抗击并赢得COVID-19。在不久的将来,我们将取得一场抗击新冠肺炎的伟大胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Acute Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on Glycemic Profile in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Improvement of Glycemic Control by Metformin Is Associated With Frequency of Defecation Before Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus A Challenging Case of Cushing’s Syndrome Due to Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Secretion The Safety of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Elderly Diabetic Patients Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference Is Superior to Other Biochemical Indicators for Diagnosing Prehypertension and Hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1