{"title":"Physical injury: Is it inevitable or preventable? an experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital of Kolkata, West Bengal","authors":"B. Paul, D. Sinha, R. Misra, M. Basu, S. Ray","doi":"10.4103/MJDRDYPU.MJDRDYPU_81_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Injuries are not random events – they have identifiable precipitating factors, and are therefore among public health's winnable battles. Substantial data-based study can help identify measures to prevent the occurrence of physical injury. Our objective was to find out the injury profile of patients attending a tertiary care hospital and assess their perception toward preventability of the event in light of their causation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients attending selected Outpatient and Inpatient Departments of Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, from February to March 2014. 216 patients who had suffered any form of physical injury and admitted/attending the selected departments were included in the study by complete enumeration method, after exclusion of unwilling and severely moribund patients. Pearson's Chi-square test was performed using Epi Info software version 3.2. Results: Highest proportion of physical injuries (24.07%) occurred among 30–40 years age group. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the most common type of injury (38.8%) followed by falls (34.7%). 38.6% of the falls occurred inside victim's homes and 25.3% occurred on road. Electricity caused 55.1% burn injuries. Faulty driving attributed to 47% of the RTAs as perceived by its victims. Majority of the victims (60.2%) opined that their injuries were not preventable. Conclusion: Raising public awareness that injury is preventable to a great extent, would help in averting such incidents, and thereby reduce unnecessary injury-related morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":36033,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","volume":"10 1","pages":"568 - 572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/MJDRDYPU.MJDRDYPU_81_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Injuries are not random events – they have identifiable precipitating factors, and are therefore among public health's winnable battles. Substantial data-based study can help identify measures to prevent the occurrence of physical injury. Our objective was to find out the injury profile of patients attending a tertiary care hospital and assess their perception toward preventability of the event in light of their causation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients attending selected Outpatient and Inpatient Departments of Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, from February to March 2014. 216 patients who had suffered any form of physical injury and admitted/attending the selected departments were included in the study by complete enumeration method, after exclusion of unwilling and severely moribund patients. Pearson's Chi-square test was performed using Epi Info software version 3.2. Results: Highest proportion of physical injuries (24.07%) occurred among 30–40 years age group. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the most common type of injury (38.8%) followed by falls (34.7%). 38.6% of the falls occurred inside victim's homes and 25.3% occurred on road. Electricity caused 55.1% burn injuries. Faulty driving attributed to 47% of the RTAs as perceived by its victims. Majority of the victims (60.2%) opined that their injuries were not preventable. Conclusion: Raising public awareness that injury is preventable to a great extent, would help in averting such incidents, and thereby reduce unnecessary injury-related morbidity and mortality.
导言:伤害不是随机事件——它们具有可识别的诱发因素,因此是公共卫生领域可打赢的战役之一。大量基于数据的研究可以帮助确定预防身体伤害发生的措施。我们的目的是找出在三级护理医院就诊的患者的损伤概况,并根据其原因评估他们对事件可预防性的看法。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2014年2月至3月在加尔各答研究生医学教育与研究所选定的门诊和住院部进行。通过完全枚举法,排除不愿意和严重垂死患者后,将216例在选定科室住院或就诊的任何形式的身体损伤患者纳入研究。使用Epi Info 3.2版软件进行Pearson卡方检验。结果:30 ~ 40岁年龄组肢体损伤发生率最高,为24.07%。道路交通事故(rta)是最常见的伤害类型(38.8%),其次是跌倒(34.7%)。38.6%的摔倒发生在受害者家中,25.3%发生在道路上。55.1%的烧伤由电引起。受害者认为47%的rta是由于驾驶失误造成的。大多数受害者(60.2%)认为他们的伤害是无法预防的。结论:在很大程度上提高公众对伤害可预防的认识,将有助于避免此类事件的发生,从而减少不必要的伤害相关发病率和死亡率。