Impact of antagonist peptides and chelators on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT using gallium-68–labeled somatostatin receptor antagonists

Haiqun Xing, Wenjia Zhu, Yue-juan Cheng, Qiao Yang, R. Jia, Hongguang Zhao, C. Bai, Li Huo, Wenming Wu
{"title":"Impact of antagonist peptides and chelators on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT using gallium-68–labeled somatostatin receptor antagonists","authors":"Haiqun Xing, Wenjia Zhu, Yue-juan Cheng, Qiao Yang, R. Jia, Hongguang Zhao, C. Bai, Li Huo, Wenming Wu","doi":"10.1097/JP9.0000000000000101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Different SSTR2 antagonists have been developed. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different peptides and chelators on the diagnostic performance of SSTR2 antagonists in well-differentiated NETs. Methods: In this prospective study, participants were equally randomized into 2 arms: arm A, participants would undergo a whole-body 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the first day and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the second day; arm B, participants would undergo a whole-body 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the first day and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET/CT scan on the second day. Biodistribution in normal organs, lesion detection ability, and tumor uptakes were compared within each arm. Results: A total of 40 participants (age, 49.5 ± 13.4, 21 men), 20 in each arm, were recruited in the study. In arm A, 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 showed lower background. However, the lesion detection ability (overall lesion detected, 445 vs 548; P = .005) and the lesion uptake (overall lesions SUVmax, 19.8 ± 17.2 vs 35.3 ± 28.8; P < .001) was significantly lower than those of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3. In arm B, both 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 showed similar biodistribution and lesion uptake (SUVmax, 28.5 ± 23.8 vs 25.0 ± 20.0; P < .001) despite minor differences. The lesion detection ability was the same between these 2 tracers (overall lesion detected, 503 vs 503). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of SSTR2 antagonists was sensitive to chelators. Both 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 outperformed 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 with higher lesion uptake and detection ability, of which 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 had marginally but significantly higher lesion uptake.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"28 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JP9.0000000000000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Different SSTR2 antagonists have been developed. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different peptides and chelators on the diagnostic performance of SSTR2 antagonists in well-differentiated NETs. Methods: In this prospective study, participants were equally randomized into 2 arms: arm A, participants would undergo a whole-body 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the first day and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the second day; arm B, participants would undergo a whole-body 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT scan on the first day and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET/CT scan on the second day. Biodistribution in normal organs, lesion detection ability, and tumor uptakes were compared within each arm. Results: A total of 40 participants (age, 49.5 ± 13.4, 21 men), 20 in each arm, were recruited in the study. In arm A, 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 showed lower background. However, the lesion detection ability (overall lesion detected, 445 vs 548; P = .005) and the lesion uptake (overall lesions SUVmax, 19.8 ± 17.2 vs 35.3 ± 28.8; P < .001) was significantly lower than those of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3. In arm B, both 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 showed similar biodistribution and lesion uptake (SUVmax, 28.5 ± 23.8 vs 25.0 ± 20.0; P < .001) despite minor differences. The lesion detection ability was the same between these 2 tracers (overall lesion detected, 503 vs 503). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of SSTR2 antagonists was sensitive to chelators. Both 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 outperformed 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 with higher lesion uptake and detection ability, of which 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 had marginally but significantly higher lesion uptake.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拮抗肽和螯合剂对使用镓-68标记生长抑素受体拮抗剂的PET/CT诊断性能的影响
目的:已开发出不同的SSTR2拮抗剂。本研究旨在评估不同肽和螯合剂对SSTR2拮抗剂在高分化NETs中诊断性能的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,参与者被平均随机分为两组:A组,参与者将在第一天接受全身68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT扫描,第二天接受68Ga-DOTA-LM3 PET/CT扫查;臂B,参与者将在第一天接受全身68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT扫描,并在第二天接受68Ga-NOD AGA-JR11 PET/CT扫查。在每只手臂内比较正常器官中的生物分布、病变检测能力和肿瘤摄取量。结果:共有40名参与者(年龄49.5岁) ± 13.4,21名男性),每只手臂20名。在臂A中,68Ga-DOTA-LM3显示出较低的背景。然而,病变检测能力(检测到的总病变,445 vs 548;P=0.005)和病变摄取(总病变SUVmax,19.8 ± 17.2对35.3 ± 28.8;P<0.001)显著低于68Ga-NODAGA-LM3。在B组中,68Ga-NODAGA-LM3和68Ga-NOD AGA-JR11均显示出相似的生物分布和病变摄取(SUVmax,28.5 ± 23.8对25.0 ± 20.0;P<0.001)。这两种示踪剂的病变检测能力相同(检测到的总病变为503 vs 503)。结论:SSTR2拮抗剂的诊断性能对螯合剂敏感。68Ga-NODAGA-LM3和68Ga-NOD AGA-JR11均优于68Ga-DOTA-LM3,具有更高的病变摄取和检测能力,其中68Ga-NODAGA-LM三具有略微但显著更高的损伤摄取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The real-world management of advanced pancreatic cancer in China. Erratum: Chinese expert consensus on imaging assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resectability. Exploring the role of YAP1 and TAZ in pancreatic acinar cells and the therapeutic potential of VT-104 in pancreatic inflammation. Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1