Questioning Terminologies: Homosocial and “Homosexual” Bonds in the Royal Bedchamber and Kingship in Medieval England and France

Q3 Arts and Humanities Royal Studies Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.21039/rsj.340
G. Storey
{"title":"Questioning Terminologies: Homosocial and “Homosexual” Bonds in the Royal Bedchamber and Kingship in Medieval England and France","authors":"G. Storey","doi":"10.21039/rsj.340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In medieval Western Europe, the sharing of a bed between the king and a close noble or friend was not uncommon, often seen as an example of a strong homosocial bond. Henry II and Richard I of England are known examples of kings who reportedly shared their beds with a male friend. The line between homosocial and what modern scholars would term homosexual bonds is often blurred when it comes to analysing close male relationships between a king and his subjects. These instances usually occurred outside the courtly residence, whilst journeying or in the midst of warfare, leaving little room for privacy and separation, thus enabling them to be reported by the contemporary chroniclers. This paper seeks to address three matters. Firstly, it outlines the terminological issues when discussing medieval masculinities and sexualities. Secondly, it investigates the nature of homosocial and “homosexual” bonds and how we attempt to differentiate these within a medieval, Western European context (here focusing on England and France). It then examines the case studies of Henry II and William Marshal, and Richard I and Philip Augustus. This article contributes to our understanding of the intersections between privacy, sexuality, and friendship. It seeks to enhance knowledge surrounding the balance of friendships and power, and how homosocial and “homosexual” bonds could impact the monarch’s relationship with their consort, and, in some cases, their ability to rule. The relationships between men need to be explored and considered in different ways, which fall outside a heteronormative framework. This study demonstrates that examining male relationships within the context of masculinity and sexuality studies provides a deeper understanding of masculine identities and their representations.","PeriodicalId":36175,"journal":{"name":"Royal Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/rsj.340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: In medieval Western Europe, the sharing of a bed between the king and a close noble or friend was not uncommon, often seen as an example of a strong homosocial bond. Henry II and Richard I of England are known examples of kings who reportedly shared their beds with a male friend. The line between homosocial and what modern scholars would term homosexual bonds is often blurred when it comes to analysing close male relationships between a king and his subjects. These instances usually occurred outside the courtly residence, whilst journeying or in the midst of warfare, leaving little room for privacy and separation, thus enabling them to be reported by the contemporary chroniclers. This paper seeks to address three matters. Firstly, it outlines the terminological issues when discussing medieval masculinities and sexualities. Secondly, it investigates the nature of homosocial and “homosexual” bonds and how we attempt to differentiate these within a medieval, Western European context (here focusing on England and France). It then examines the case studies of Henry II and William Marshal, and Richard I and Philip Augustus. This article contributes to our understanding of the intersections between privacy, sexuality, and friendship. It seeks to enhance knowledge surrounding the balance of friendships and power, and how homosocial and “homosexual” bonds could impact the monarch’s relationship with their consort, and, in some cases, their ability to rule. The relationships between men need to be explored and considered in different ways, which fall outside a heteronormative framework. This study demonstrates that examining male relationships within the context of masculinity and sexuality studies provides a deeper understanding of masculine identities and their representations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质疑术语:中世纪英国和法国皇家寝宫和王权中的同性恋和“同性恋”纽带
当前位置在中世纪的西欧,国王和亲密的贵族或朋友共用一张床并不罕见,通常被视为一种强烈的同性社会联系的例子。据报道,英国国王亨利二世和理查一世都与男性朋友同床共枕。在分析国王和臣民之间亲密的男性关系时,同性恋社会和现代学者所说的同性恋关系之间的界限往往是模糊的。这些事件通常发生在宫廷住所之外,在旅途中或在战争中,几乎没有隐私和分离的空间,因此使它们能够被当代编年史家报道。本文试图解决三个问题。首先,它概述了讨论中世纪男性气质和性行为时的术语问题。其次,它调查了同性恋社会和“同性恋”关系的本质,以及我们如何试图在中世纪,西欧的背景下区分它们(这里主要关注英国和法国)。然后,它考察了亨利二世和威廉·马歇尔,理查德一世和菲利普·奥古斯都的案例研究。这篇文章有助于我们理解隐私、性和友谊之间的交集。它旨在提高人们对友谊和权力平衡的认识,以及同性恋社会和“同性恋”关系如何影响君主与配偶的关系,在某些情况下,还会影响君主的统治能力。男人之间的关系需要以不同的方式来探索和考虑,而这些方式不属于异性恋规范的框架。这项研究表明,在男性气质和性研究的背景下审视男性关系,可以更深入地理解男性身份及其表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Studies Journal
Royal Studies Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rohr and Benz, Queenship and the Women of Westeros. Female Agency and Advice in Game of Thrones and A Song of Ice and Fire (Palgrave MacMillan, 2020) Saint King Oswald of Northumbria: Overlord or Imperator? A Very Peculiar Ancestor Murray, Baldwin of Bourcq: Count of Edessa and King of Jerusalem (1100-1131), (Routledge, 2021) Royalty, Celebrity, and the Press in Georgian Britain, 1770-1820 Peebles and Scarlatta (eds.), Representing the Life and Legacy of Renée de France: From Fille de France to Dowager Duchess (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1