Critical Perspectives of Racialized Identities within Social Justice and Equity in Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Megan Che, Carlos Gomez, Dennis Kombe
{"title":"Critical Perspectives of Racialized Identities within Social Justice and Equity in Mathematics Teaching and Learning","authors":"Megan Che, Carlos Gomez, Dennis Kombe","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2021.1885124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue started as a conversation among colleagues wanting to create a bigger space for challenging conversations on equity and social justice. We sought the opportunity to guest edit this issue in order to create a platform for work that fosters and encourages new ways of investigating the intersections of social justice, mathematics education, and equity. We already had notions of our colleagues’ bravery in pushing boundaries, but never did we imagine the incredible work being done. The pieces in this special issue conceptualize, in different ways, the racialized identities of students and teachers, and we feel this strong focus has helped us achieve our goal. We recognize, however, the political responsibility of being editors for a special issue bestowed on us. There were many difficult decisions about whose voice to include and whose to exclude, what qualifies as high quality and why are those the criteria we are using, and how do we demonstrate the range of research related to social justice. Many conversations were needed to determine the voices that needed to be elevated through this platform we graciously were provided by the editorial team of Investigations in Mathematics Learning. We are proud of the work in this issue and all those who contributed to it, including the reviewers, authors, all who submitted proposals, and the editors of IML. As both a beginning and an end of this editorial process, we feel a responsibility to articulate the ways we make sense of interrelationships among concepts, processes, and aims relevant to social justice, so we offer the following frame. For us, social justice lives more as an adjective than a noun – it is a phrase delineating a particular way of being/becoming rather than an object denoting a static entity. The attribute of “socially just” represents one of many potential ways of being/becoming and, thus, is far from inevitable. For us, drawing on Bell’s (2016) formulation, being socially just means the context and conditions for the topic under consideration (e.g., a society, a classroom action) are such that each person can become their full selves and can participate wholly in mutually beneficial social processes. Being/becoming socially just, then, implies both a set of initial conditions as well as (in)tangible results or lived experiences. One requisite precondition, of the set of initial conditions for being socially just, is equity, which we see as a state of being in which every person, particularly those who have been historically marginalized, has access to what they require in order to meaningfully engage in these processes of forming socially just contexts. Specifically, in action, for us, being/becoming socially just entails:","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2021.1885124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.1885124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue started as a conversation among colleagues wanting to create a bigger space for challenging conversations on equity and social justice. We sought the opportunity to guest edit this issue in order to create a platform for work that fosters and encourages new ways of investigating the intersections of social justice, mathematics education, and equity. We already had notions of our colleagues’ bravery in pushing boundaries, but never did we imagine the incredible work being done. The pieces in this special issue conceptualize, in different ways, the racialized identities of students and teachers, and we feel this strong focus has helped us achieve our goal. We recognize, however, the political responsibility of being editors for a special issue bestowed on us. There were many difficult decisions about whose voice to include and whose to exclude, what qualifies as high quality and why are those the criteria we are using, and how do we demonstrate the range of research related to social justice. Many conversations were needed to determine the voices that needed to be elevated through this platform we graciously were provided by the editorial team of Investigations in Mathematics Learning. We are proud of the work in this issue and all those who contributed to it, including the reviewers, authors, all who submitted proposals, and the editors of IML. As both a beginning and an end of this editorial process, we feel a responsibility to articulate the ways we make sense of interrelationships among concepts, processes, and aims relevant to social justice, so we offer the following frame. For us, social justice lives more as an adjective than a noun – it is a phrase delineating a particular way of being/becoming rather than an object denoting a static entity. The attribute of “socially just” represents one of many potential ways of being/becoming and, thus, is far from inevitable. For us, drawing on Bell’s (2016) formulation, being socially just means the context and conditions for the topic under consideration (e.g., a society, a classroom action) are such that each person can become their full selves and can participate wholly in mutually beneficial social processes. Being/becoming socially just, then, implies both a set of initial conditions as well as (in)tangible results or lived experiences. One requisite precondition, of the set of initial conditions for being socially just, is equity, which we see as a state of being in which every person, particularly those who have been historically marginalized, has access to what they require in order to meaningfully engage in these processes of forming socially just contexts. Specifically, in action, for us, being/becoming socially just entails:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学教与学的社会正义与公平中种族化身份的批判视角
这期特刊最初是同事们的一次对话,他们希望为关于公平和社会正义的富有挑战性的对话创造更大的空间。我们寻求机会对本期进行客座编辑,以创建一个工作平台,促进和鼓励调查社会正义、数学教育和公平交叉点的新方法。我们已经意识到同事们勇于突破界限,但我们从未想象过正在做的令人难以置信的工作。本期特刊中的文章以不同的方式概念化了学生和教师的种族化身份,我们觉得这种强烈的关注帮助我们实现了目标。然而,我们认识到,作为一期特刊的编辑,我们肩负着政治责任。关于包括谁的声音和排除谁的声音,什么是高质量的,为什么这些是我们正在使用的标准,以及我们如何展示与社会正义相关的研究范围,我们做出了许多艰难的决定。我们需要进行多次对话,以确定需要通过这个平台提升的声音。《数学学习调查》的编辑团队很荣幸地为我们提供了这些声音。我们为本期的工作以及所有对此做出贡献的人感到骄傲,包括审稿人、作者、所有提交提案的人和IML的编辑。作为这一编辑过程的开始和结束,我们感到有责任阐明我们如何理解与社会正义相关的概念、过程和目标之间的相互关系,因此我们提供了以下框架。对我们来说,社会正义更多地是一个形容词,而不是名词——它是一个描述存在/成为特定方式的短语,而不是一个表示静态实体的对象。“社会公正”的属性代表了许多潜在的存在/成为方式之一,因此,这远非不可避免。对我们来说,根据贝尔(2016)的公式,社会公正意味着所考虑主题的背景和条件(例如,社会、课堂活动),每个人都可以成为完整的自己,并完全参与互利的社会过程。因此,社会公正意味着一系列初始条件以及有形的结果或生活经历。社会公正的一套初始条件的一个必要先决条件是公平,我们认为公平是一种存在状态,在这种状态下,每个人,特别是那些历史上被边缘化的人,都能获得他们所需要的东西,以便有意义地参与这些形成社会公正环境的过程。具体来说,在行动中,对我们来说,成为社会成员只需要:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Connections within the Multiplicative Field: A Case Study of Adán’s Mathematical Thinking Investigating the Complexity in Elementary Teachers’ Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking in Written Work Preservice Secondary Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Focus on Reflective Practice The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Units Construction and Coordination: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1