A Common Tradition Underlying the Temptation Pericope of Matthew 4:1–11 and the Qumran Psalm Pesher (4QpPsa, 4Q171)

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Ancient Judaism Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.30965/21967954-12340019
David Katzin
{"title":"A Common Tradition Underlying the Temptation Pericope of Matthew 4:1–11 and the Qumran Psalm Pesher (4QpPsa, 4Q171)","authors":"David Katzin","doi":"10.30965/21967954-12340019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study posits that the Temptation pericope of Matt 4:1–11 and the Psalm Pesher (4QpPsa, 4Q171) are based on a common tradition. Underlying this tradition is a dual-tripartite construct of testing/temptation. This is based on the three Pentateuchal wilderness tests encountered by Israel which are identifiable through the root נ–ס–ה/“test:” keeping the law, false prophecy leading to idolatry, and testing God. Conflated, and individually correlated with this, are the three nets of Belial: “fornication,” “wealth,” and “profanation of the Temple,” respectively. Also going beyond the biblical narrative are the Devil acting in circumlocution for God, the venues, forms of testing, and lexicon used in corresponding testing sections of these two texts. Only through Psalm 37, together with its exegesis in 4Q171, is this shared tradition recognized. In conclusion, the provenance and diachronic history of this tradition, which resulted in differing understandings of it, is investigated.","PeriodicalId":41821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ancient Judaism","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ancient Judaism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/21967954-12340019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study posits that the Temptation pericope of Matt 4:1–11 and the Psalm Pesher (4QpPsa, 4Q171) are based on a common tradition. Underlying this tradition is a dual-tripartite construct of testing/temptation. This is based on the three Pentateuchal wilderness tests encountered by Israel which are identifiable through the root נ–ס–ה/“test:” keeping the law, false prophecy leading to idolatry, and testing God. Conflated, and individually correlated with this, are the three nets of Belial: “fornication,” “wealth,” and “profanation of the Temple,” respectively. Also going beyond the biblical narrative are the Devil acting in circumlocution for God, the venues, forms of testing, and lexicon used in corresponding testing sections of these two texts. Only through Psalm 37, together with its exegesis in 4Q171, is this shared tradition recognized. In conclusion, the provenance and diachronic history of this tradition, which resulted in differing understandings of it, is investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《马太福音》4:1-11和《库姆兰诗篇》Pesher(4QpPsa,4Q171)诱惑论的共同传统
这项研究认为,《马太福音》4:1-11的《诱惑》和《诗篇》(4QpPsa,4Q171)是基于一个共同的传统。这一传统的基础是测试/诱惑的双重-三重结构。这是基于以色列遇到的三个Pentateuchal荒野测试,这些测试可以通过词根“测试”来识别:遵守法律、导致偶像崇拜的虚假预言和测试上帝。与之相冲突,并分别与之相关的是信仰的三个网:“通奸”、“财富”和“亵渎圣殿”。超越圣经叙事的还有魔鬼对上帝的拐弯抹角,测试的场所、形式,以及这两本书相应测试部分使用的词汇。只有通过《诗篇》第37篇及其第1971年第4季度的注释,这一共同的传统才得到承认。最后,对这一传统的起源和历时历史进行了考察,这导致了人们对它的不同理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
A Re-evaluation and Analysis of CPJ V 638 and Its Implications for Understanding Social Relationships in the Roman Empire, and the Roman-Jewish Relationship in Particular A “Queer” Mother of Nations: Reproductive Futurism and the Maccabean Mother of Seven What Did Jacob Read at Bethel?: Scrolls and Scripture in Jubilees 32:21–26 The Aramaic Inscriptions from Mount Gerizim: Production, Identity, and Resistance Divine Wisdom and Knowledge on Steroids: גבורה in Biblical Tradition and at Qumran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1