World risk society. Environmental risks: a driving force for cosmopolitanism

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2018-12-19 DOI:10.1504/IJFIP.2018.10018066
V. Wittmann
{"title":"World risk society. Environmental risks: a driving force for cosmopolitanism","authors":"V. Wittmann","doi":"10.1504/IJFIP.2018.10018066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk society today means world risk society. Its essential features are man-made risks, which have no social, space or time limits. World risk society identifies three main global risks: transnational terrorism, financial hazards and environmental risks. Environmental issues in this framework cannot be seen as problems in the environment of society, but they have to be considered as inner world problems of society itself. The interpretational framework of world risk society can be subdivided into three levels: first, global threats cause global commonalities; the contours of a world public are emerging. Secondly, the perception of global self-hazards releases a politically tailored impulse for the revitalisation of national policy as well as for the training and design of cooperative international institutions. Thirdly, the delimitation of the political has to be researched: the perceived needs of world risk society give way to a world civil society. Henceforth, in world risk society environmental hazards can be interpreted as a driving force for cosmopolitanism, global environmental risks and their practical and discursive treatment create transnational communities.","PeriodicalId":35015,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.10018066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk society today means world risk society. Its essential features are man-made risks, which have no social, space or time limits. World risk society identifies three main global risks: transnational terrorism, financial hazards and environmental risks. Environmental issues in this framework cannot be seen as problems in the environment of society, but they have to be considered as inner world problems of society itself. The interpretational framework of world risk society can be subdivided into three levels: first, global threats cause global commonalities; the contours of a world public are emerging. Secondly, the perception of global self-hazards releases a politically tailored impulse for the revitalisation of national policy as well as for the training and design of cooperative international institutions. Thirdly, the delimitation of the political has to be researched: the perceived needs of world risk society give way to a world civil society. Henceforth, in world risk society environmental hazards can be interpreted as a driving force for cosmopolitanism, global environmental risks and their practical and discursive treatment create transnational communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界风险社会。环境风险:世界主义的驱动力
今天的风险社会就是世界风险社会。其本质特征是人为风险,不受社会、空间和时间的限制。世界风险协会确定了三大全球风险:跨国恐怖主义、金融风险和环境风险。在这个框架下的环境问题不能被看作是社会环境问题,而必须被看作是社会自身的内在世界问题。世界风险社会的解释框架可以细分为三个层次:第一,全球性威胁导致全球共性;世界公众的轮廓正在形成。第二,对全球自我危害的认识为振兴国家政策以及培训和设计合作性国际机构释放了一种政治上有针对性的冲动。第三,必须研究政治的界定:世界风险社会的感知需求让位给世界公民社会。因此,在世界风险社会中,环境危害可以被解释为世界主义的驱动力,全球环境风险及其实际和话语处理创造了跨国社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The IJFIP has been established as a peer reviewed, international authoritative reference in the field. It publishes high calibre academic articles dealing with knowledge creation, diffusion and utilisation in innovation policy. The journal thus covers all types of Strategic Intelligence (SI). SI is defined as the set of actions that search, process, diffuse and protect information in order to make it available to the right person at the right time in order to make the right decision. Examples of SI in the domain of innovation include Foresight, Forecasting, Delphi studies, Technology Assessment, Benchmarking, R&D evaluation and Technology Roadmapping.
期刊最新文献
Actual strategic directions for the development of Russian fuel and energy companies to ensure the country's economic security Strategic foresight for competitive advantage: A future-oriented business and competitive analysis techniques selection model Size does matter: South Africa's automotive industry during and post the COVID-19 pandemic Futures of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, including Computer Science (STEM/CS) Education: What will the crossroad with Liberal Arts look like Forecasting New Product Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1