A Revisit of Zumbo’s Third Generation DIF: How Are We Doing in Language Testing?

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Assessment Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1080/15434303.2021.1963253
Hongli Li, C. Hunter, Jacquelyn A. Bialo
{"title":"A Revisit of Zumbo’s Third Generation DIF: How Are We Doing in Language Testing?","authors":"Hongli Li, C. Hunter, Jacquelyn A. Bialo","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2021.1963253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to review the status of differential item functioning (DIF) research in language testing, particularly as it relates to the investigation of sources (or causes) of DIF, which is a defining characteristic of the third generation DIF. This review included 110 DIF studies of language tests dated from 1985 to 2019. We found that DIF researchers did not address sources of DIF more frequently in recent years than in earlier years. Nevertheless, DIF research in language testing has expanded with new DIF analysis procedures, more grouping variables, and more diversified methods for investigating sources of DIF. In addition, in the early years of DIF research, methods to identify sources of DIF relied heavily on content analysis. This review showed that while more sophisticated statistical procedures have been adopted in recent years to address sources of DIF, understanding sources of DIF still remains a challenging task. We also discuss the pros and cons of existing methods to detect sources of DIF and implications for future investigations.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":"19 1","pages":"27 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1963253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to review the status of differential item functioning (DIF) research in language testing, particularly as it relates to the investigation of sources (or causes) of DIF, which is a defining characteristic of the third generation DIF. This review included 110 DIF studies of language tests dated from 1985 to 2019. We found that DIF researchers did not address sources of DIF more frequently in recent years than in earlier years. Nevertheless, DIF research in language testing has expanded with new DIF analysis procedures, more grouping variables, and more diversified methods for investigating sources of DIF. In addition, in the early years of DIF research, methods to identify sources of DIF relied heavily on content analysis. This review showed that while more sophisticated statistical procedures have been adopted in recent years to address sources of DIF, understanding sources of DIF still remains a challenging task. We also discuss the pros and cons of existing methods to detect sources of DIF and implications for future investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重访Zumbo的第三代DIF:我们在语言测试中做得怎么样?
摘要本研究的目的是回顾差异项目功能(DIF)在语言测试中的研究现状,特别是与第三代DIF的定义特征——差异项目功能的来源(或原因)调查有关的研究。这篇综述包括1985年至2019年的110项DIF语言测试研究。我们发现,近年来DIF研究人员并没有比前几年更频繁地处理DIF的来源。尽管如此,语言测试中的DIF研究已经随着新的DIF分析程序、更多的变量分组和更多样化的调查DIF来源的方法而扩展。此外,在DIF研究的早期,识别DIF来源的方法在很大程度上依赖于内容分析。这项审查表明,尽管近年来采用了更复杂的统计程序来处理DIF的来源,但了解DIF的起源仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。我们还讨论了检测DIF来源的现有方法的优缺点以及对未来调查的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment The Diagnosis of Writing in a Second or Foreign Language The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks Twenty Years of Language Assessment Quarterly: An Interview with LAQ Founder Antony Kunnan Fundamental Considerations in Technology Mediated Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1