The Polish family in transition: a shift towards greater gender equality?

IF 2.1 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Contemporary Social Science Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1080/21582041.2022.2077419
Anna Kwak
{"title":"The Polish family in transition: a shift towards greater gender equality?","authors":"Anna Kwak","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2022.2077419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aims at tracking patterns of both change and consistency with regard to women’s roles in Poland, with particular focus on family roles. This paper considers whether women’s disproportionate domestic labour and childcare constitutes the so-called double burden or a successful example of work–family balance. In addressing this question, the paper considers survey evidence concerning the gap between preferred and implemented models for the division of domestic labour and childcare. Is there a strong expectation of a gendered domestic division of labour in contemporary Poland? What do women in Poland think about this? Following Ulrich Beck’s individualisation theory (2002), as well as Hakim’s preference theory (2006), this paper provides a secondary analysis of gender roles in terms of both paid work and unpaid work. In contemporary society, ‘doing family’ leads to changes in the internal structure of family. In the Polish context, however, it is unclear whether this signals a transition to full gender equality or, rather, perpetuates inequality.","PeriodicalId":46484,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2022.2077419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article aims at tracking patterns of both change and consistency with regard to women’s roles in Poland, with particular focus on family roles. This paper considers whether women’s disproportionate domestic labour and childcare constitutes the so-called double burden or a successful example of work–family balance. In addressing this question, the paper considers survey evidence concerning the gap between preferred and implemented models for the division of domestic labour and childcare. Is there a strong expectation of a gendered domestic division of labour in contemporary Poland? What do women in Poland think about this? Following Ulrich Beck’s individualisation theory (2002), as well as Hakim’s preference theory (2006), this paper provides a secondary analysis of gender roles in terms of both paid work and unpaid work. In contemporary society, ‘doing family’ leads to changes in the internal structure of family. In the Polish context, however, it is unclear whether this signals a transition to full gender equality or, rather, perpetuates inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转型中的波兰家庭:迈向更大程度的性别平等?
摘要本文旨在跟踪波兰妇女角色的变化和一致性模式,特别关注家庭角色。本文考虑了妇女不成比例的家务劳动和育儿是否构成了所谓的双重负担,或者是工作与家庭平衡的一个成功例子。在解决这一问题时,该文件考虑了有关家庭劳动力和儿童保育分工的首选模式与实施模式之间差距的调查证据。在当代波兰,是否存在对性别化的国内分工的强烈期望?波兰女性对此有何看法?根据Ulrich Beck的个性化理论(2002)和Hakim的偏好理论(2006),本文对有偿工作和无偿工作中的性别角色进行了二次分析。在当代社会,“做家庭”导致了家庭内部结构的变化。然而,在波兰的背景下,尚不清楚这是向完全性别平等过渡的信号,还是使不平等永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Reinventing public transport: rising to the transition challenge A ‘just transition’ for workers in the automotive sector? Survey evidence from the West Midlands Enabling a just transition Exploring opportunities for public sector organisations to connect wellbeing to resource loops in a regional circular economy People-centred policies for a just transition (digital, green and skills)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1