Economic History

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES African Studies Pub Date : 2021-02-24 DOI:10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0219
E. Frankema
{"title":"Economic History","authors":"E. Frankema","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of Africa’s economic past has experienced phases of growth and decline. In the 1960s to 1980s scholarly interest in African economic history surged. Major themes, such as slavery and the slave trades, agricultural development, colonial economic policy, demography, poverty, and growth and structural change, invited discussion and sometimes heated debate. Dependency and Marxist perspectives dominated the literature of the 1970s and 1980s and the influential “formalist-substantivist” debate within economic anthropology addressed the validity of Western, capitalist models of rational economic behavior to study non-Western or non-capitalist societies. The early literature did much to recover the making by Africans of their own economic histories, including in internal trade (and commodity currencies) before colonial rule, and in researching the initiative/agency of Africans in expanding agricultural production for the market, especially in West Africa from “legitimate commerce” onward. It also laid the foundation for quantitative approaches, which are currently expanding in many directions. Growing numbers of historians from Africa, Europe, and North America inspired the foundation, in 1974, of the field journal African Economic History, published by the African Studies Program at the University of Wisconsin. In the 1990s the field coped with diminishing interest, and Marxist perspectives lost terrain. Many of the leading scholars of the “first generation” retired or branched off into other emerging fields, such as global history. Historians in the United States turned their backs on number-crunching economic historians. The field may also have suffered from rising pessimism concerning Africa’s economic future. Whatever the causes, the fading attention given to African economic history occurred at a time when Africans themselves were overcoming a period of intensive political and economic distress (see Hopkins 2009, cited under The “New” African Economic History). The foundation of the African Economic History Network in 2011 marked a renaissance within African economic history that became evident in the late 2000s. Scholars of The “New” African Economic History developed new quantitative and comparative approaches, using new data sources. They tended to make lesser use though of anthropological approaches and the rich ethnographic literature of Africa than earlier scholarship had done. Methodologically, the field saw a divide between scholars who combine the qualitative and quantitative approaches common in economic history and a new branch—often referred to as “historical economics”—that leans strongly toward the methods of applied economics, with an increasing emphasis on “causal identification.” Chances that the current wave of interest in the economic past of Africa will wither away again appear much lower these days. International development agencies are focusing increasingly on sub-Saharan Africa as the front line in their fight against global poverty. Climate change, demographic growth, Africa’s “green revolution,” new trade agreements (e.g., the African Continental Free Trade Area [AfCFTA]), and the shifting gravity centers of the global economy in general all forge a broad public interest in the long-term dynamics of African economies. Moreover, contrary to the 1990s, renewed optimism has emerged regarding the opportunities of African economies to outgrow poverty. This article focuses mainly, though not exclusively, on the work produced by economic historians, most of whom are united in the African Economic History Network (AEHN), that can be associated with The “New” African Economic History. This bibliography gives little attention to North Africa, but it does include some key references on the economic history of South Africa.","PeriodicalId":51769,"journal":{"name":"African Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199846733-0219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study of Africa’s economic past has experienced phases of growth and decline. In the 1960s to 1980s scholarly interest in African economic history surged. Major themes, such as slavery and the slave trades, agricultural development, colonial economic policy, demography, poverty, and growth and structural change, invited discussion and sometimes heated debate. Dependency and Marxist perspectives dominated the literature of the 1970s and 1980s and the influential “formalist-substantivist” debate within economic anthropology addressed the validity of Western, capitalist models of rational economic behavior to study non-Western or non-capitalist societies. The early literature did much to recover the making by Africans of their own economic histories, including in internal trade (and commodity currencies) before colonial rule, and in researching the initiative/agency of Africans in expanding agricultural production for the market, especially in West Africa from “legitimate commerce” onward. It also laid the foundation for quantitative approaches, which are currently expanding in many directions. Growing numbers of historians from Africa, Europe, and North America inspired the foundation, in 1974, of the field journal African Economic History, published by the African Studies Program at the University of Wisconsin. In the 1990s the field coped with diminishing interest, and Marxist perspectives lost terrain. Many of the leading scholars of the “first generation” retired or branched off into other emerging fields, such as global history. Historians in the United States turned their backs on number-crunching economic historians. The field may also have suffered from rising pessimism concerning Africa’s economic future. Whatever the causes, the fading attention given to African economic history occurred at a time when Africans themselves were overcoming a period of intensive political and economic distress (see Hopkins 2009, cited under The “New” African Economic History). The foundation of the African Economic History Network in 2011 marked a renaissance within African economic history that became evident in the late 2000s. Scholars of The “New” African Economic History developed new quantitative and comparative approaches, using new data sources. They tended to make lesser use though of anthropological approaches and the rich ethnographic literature of Africa than earlier scholarship had done. Methodologically, the field saw a divide between scholars who combine the qualitative and quantitative approaches common in economic history and a new branch—often referred to as “historical economics”—that leans strongly toward the methods of applied economics, with an increasing emphasis on “causal identification.” Chances that the current wave of interest in the economic past of Africa will wither away again appear much lower these days. International development agencies are focusing increasingly on sub-Saharan Africa as the front line in their fight against global poverty. Climate change, demographic growth, Africa’s “green revolution,” new trade agreements (e.g., the African Continental Free Trade Area [AfCFTA]), and the shifting gravity centers of the global economy in general all forge a broad public interest in the long-term dynamics of African economies. Moreover, contrary to the 1990s, renewed optimism has emerged regarding the opportunities of African economies to outgrow poverty. This article focuses mainly, though not exclusively, on the work produced by economic historians, most of whom are united in the African Economic History Network (AEHN), that can be associated with The “New” African Economic History. This bibliography gives little attention to North Africa, but it does include some key references on the economic history of South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济史
对非洲过去经济的研究经历了增长和衰退的阶段。20世纪60年代至80年代,学术界对非洲经济史的兴趣激增。奴隶制和奴隶贸易、农业发展、殖民地经济政策、人口统计、贫困、增长和结构变化等主要主题引起了讨论,有时还引发了激烈的辩论。依赖性和马克思主义观点主导了20世纪70年代和80年代的文学,经济人类学中有影响力的“形式主义-实质主义”辩论讨论了西方资本主义理性经济行为模型研究非西方或非资本主义社会的有效性。早期文献在很大程度上恢复了非洲人对自己经济历史的创造,包括殖民统治前的内部贸易(和商品货币),以及研究非洲人在扩大农业生产以供市场方面的主动性/代理性,特别是从“合法商业”开始的西非。它还为量化方法奠定了基础,这些方法目前正在向多个方向扩展。来自非洲、欧洲和北美的越来越多的历史学家启发了威斯康星大学非洲研究项目于1974年出版的《非洲经济史》实地期刊的成立。20世纪90年代,该领域面临着兴趣的下降,马克思主义观点失去了阵地。许多“第一代”的领军学者退休或涉足其他新兴领域,如全球史。美国的历史学家背弃了善于计算数字的经济历史学家。该领域可能还受到对非洲经济未来日益悲观的影响。无论是什么原因,人们对非洲经济史的关注度下降,都发生在非洲人自己正在克服一段密集的政治和经济困境的时期(见霍普金斯大学2009年,《新非洲经济史》下引用)。2011年非洲经济史网络的成立标志着非洲经济史的复兴,这在21世纪末变得显而易见。“新”非洲经济史的学者们利用新的数据来源开发了新的定量和比较方法。尽管与早期的学术相比,他们倾向于较少使用人类学方法和丰富的非洲民族志文献。在方法论上,该领域的学者们将经济史上常见的定性和定量方法相结合,而一个新的分支——通常被称为“历史经济学”——则强烈倾向于应用经济学的方法,越来越强调“因果识别”。“如今,人们对非洲过去经济的兴趣再次消退的可能性似乎要低得多。国际发展机构越来越关注撒哈拉以南非洲,将其作为消除全球贫困的前线。气候变化、人口增长、非洲的“绿色革命”、新的贸易协议(如非洲大陆自由贸易区[AfCFTA])以及全球经济重心的变化,都使公众对非洲经济的长期动态产生了广泛的兴趣。此外,与1990年代相反,人们对非洲经济摆脱贫困的机会再次感到乐观。本文主要(但不限于)关注经济历史学家的工作,他们中的大多数人都团结在非洲经济史网络(AEHN)中,可以与“新”非洲经济史联系在一起。这份参考书目很少关注北非,但它确实包括了一些关于南非经济史的重要参考文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies
African Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sincere Intimacy, Genre and Heterotopology of a Confessional Public Communal Land and Belonging Among Foreign Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy Neoliberal Leveraging of the Colonial Imagination: A Global South Reading of Tobacco Ads in Africa Entrenched Coloniality? Colonial-Born Black Women, Hair and Identity in Post-Apartheid South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1