The effects of thiamine on patients with sepsis and septic shock

Yelena Sahakian, D. Dyakov
{"title":"The effects of thiamine on patients with sepsis and septic shock","authors":"Yelena Sahakian, D. Dyakov","doi":"10.21037/jeccm-21-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is growing evidence that thiamine alone or in combination with vitamin C and steroids may have benefits in patients with sepsis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of intravenous thiamine following creation of an institutional thiamine guideline for sepsis. Methods: In this biphasic IRB-approved study, the pre-intervention group consisted of patients 18 years or older admitted to a critical care unit with sepsis/septic shock who received intravenous thiamine plus standard care (n=26). In the retrospective phase, they were matched with patients with the same diagnosis who served as a control group (n=26). The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were time to death, critical care length of stay, time to lactate level <2 mmol/L, vasopressor use and duration, renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, and PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio. An evidence-based thiamine guideline for sepsis, standardizing the dose, duration, and time of initiation, was developed and implemented. In the prospective phase, the post-intervention thiamine group was compared with both the pre-intervention thiamine and control groups measuring the same endpoints. Results: In the pre- and post-intervention phase, there was no difference in hospital mortality. However, more patients in the control group required RRT as compared to pre-intervention thiamine group (65.4% vs. 42.3%, P=0.013). The post-intervention thiamine group also showed decreased RRT requirement compared to the control group (36.8% vs. 65.4%, P=0.02). Conclusions: Thiamine did not show hospital mortality benefit. However, it may be considered for use in patients with renal dysfunction. Future studies should further explore renally-protective effects of thiamine.","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jeccm-21-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence that thiamine alone or in combination with vitamin C and steroids may have benefits in patients with sepsis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of intravenous thiamine following creation of an institutional thiamine guideline for sepsis. Methods: In this biphasic IRB-approved study, the pre-intervention group consisted of patients 18 years or older admitted to a critical care unit with sepsis/septic shock who received intravenous thiamine plus standard care (n=26). In the retrospective phase, they were matched with patients with the same diagnosis who served as a control group (n=26). The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were time to death, critical care length of stay, time to lactate level <2 mmol/L, vasopressor use and duration, renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, and PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio. An evidence-based thiamine guideline for sepsis, standardizing the dose, duration, and time of initiation, was developed and implemented. In the prospective phase, the post-intervention thiamine group was compared with both the pre-intervention thiamine and control groups measuring the same endpoints. Results: In the pre- and post-intervention phase, there was no difference in hospital mortality. However, more patients in the control group required RRT as compared to pre-intervention thiamine group (65.4% vs. 42.3%, P=0.013). The post-intervention thiamine group also showed decreased RRT requirement compared to the control group (36.8% vs. 65.4%, P=0.02). Conclusions: Thiamine did not show hospital mortality benefit. However, it may be considered for use in patients with renal dysfunction. Future studies should further explore renally-protective effects of thiamine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫胺素对败血症和感染性休克患者的影响
背景:越来越多的证据表明,硫胺素单独使用或与维生素C和类固醇联合使用可能对败血症患者有益。本研究的目的是在制定机构硫胺素治疗败血症指南后,评估静脉注射硫胺素的效果。方法:在这项经IRB批准的双相研究中,干预前组由18岁或以上的败血症/感染性休克重症监护室患者组成,他们接受了静脉注射硫胺素加标准护理(n=26)。在回顾性阶段,他们与具有相同诊断的患者进行匹配,作为对照组(n=26)。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要终点是死亡时间、重症监护住院时间、乳酸水平<2 mmol/L的时间、血管升压药的使用和持续时间、肾脏替代治疗(RRT)要求和PaO2/FiO2比率。制定并实施了一项基于证据的败血症硫胺素指南,标准化了剂量、持续时间和起始时间。在前瞻性阶段,将干预后硫胺素组与干预前硫胺素和对照组进行比较,测量相同的终点。结果:在干预前和干预后阶段,住院死亡率没有差异。然而,与干预前硫胺素组相比,对照组中需要RRT的患者更多(65.4%对42.3%,P=0.013)。与对照组相比(36.8%对65.4%,P=0.02),干预后硫胺素也显示出RRT需求降低。结论:硫胺素没有显示出医院死亡率的益处。然而,它可以考虑用于肾功能障碍患者。未来的研究应该进一步探索硫胺素对肾脏的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1