Reversal of hypertensive heart disease: a multiple linear regression model

S. Ahmed, R. Jhaj, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, R. Joshi
{"title":"Reversal of hypertensive heart disease: a multiple linear regression model","authors":"S. Ahmed, R. Jhaj, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, R. Joshi","doi":"10.15190/d.2021.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The development of left ventricular hypertrophy in primary hypertension increases cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy through therapeutic control of blood pressure reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular incidents. Objective: In our study, we explored for the determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy regression. Methods: A cohort (n=217) of patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy was identified by screening consecutive patients in medical outpatient unit. The primary inclusion criteria were (i) Blood pressure more than140/90 mm of Hg (ii) Left Ventricular Mass Index more than 115 and 95 gm/m2 for males and females respectively. Left Ventricular Mass Index was determined by echocardiography at the time of recruitment and after 24 weeks of standard pharmacotherapy. The change in Left Ventricular Mass Index was modelled using multiple linear regression with both categorical and continuous explanatory variables. The effect of drug therapy on change in Left Ventricular Mass Index was tested in the model with dummy coded variables for the treatment categories. Results: In simple linear regression, the variables significantly correlating with change in Left Ventricular Mass Index were baseline Left Ventricular Mass Index (r=0.62, p<0.001), change in systolic blood pressure (r=0.22, p=0.001), change in mean blood pressure (r=0.16, p=0.02), baseline systolic blood pressure (r=0.15, p=0.02), age (r=0.12, p=0.09) and diabetes (r=0.12, p=0.09). The best fit model (r2=0.408) retained baseline Left Ventricular Mass Index (β=0.59, p<0.001), change in systolic blood pressure (β=0.14, p=0.01) and diabetes (β=-0.104, p=0.05) as the significant predictors. Introduction of treatment effect into the model non-significantly increased the fit of the model (r2=0.414, p=0.27-0.98). Conclusions: Pre-treatment Left Ventricular Mass Index and reduction in systolic blood pressure were the major determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy regression. We also observed that there is lesser left ventricular hypertrophy regression in diabetic patients, warranting future research to explore glycaemic control as a modifiable factor in left ventricular hypertrophy reversal.","PeriodicalId":72829,"journal":{"name":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15190/d.2021.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The development of left ventricular hypertrophy in primary hypertension increases cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy through therapeutic control of blood pressure reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular incidents. Objective: In our study, we explored for the determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy regression. Methods: A cohort (n=217) of patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy was identified by screening consecutive patients in medical outpatient unit. The primary inclusion criteria were (i) Blood pressure more than140/90 mm of Hg (ii) Left Ventricular Mass Index more than 115 and 95 gm/m2 for males and females respectively. Left Ventricular Mass Index was determined by echocardiography at the time of recruitment and after 24 weeks of standard pharmacotherapy. The change in Left Ventricular Mass Index was modelled using multiple linear regression with both categorical and continuous explanatory variables. The effect of drug therapy on change in Left Ventricular Mass Index was tested in the model with dummy coded variables for the treatment categories. Results: In simple linear regression, the variables significantly correlating with change in Left Ventricular Mass Index were baseline Left Ventricular Mass Index (r=0.62, p<0.001), change in systolic blood pressure (r=0.22, p=0.001), change in mean blood pressure (r=0.16, p=0.02), baseline systolic blood pressure (r=0.15, p=0.02), age (r=0.12, p=0.09) and diabetes (r=0.12, p=0.09). The best fit model (r2=0.408) retained baseline Left Ventricular Mass Index (β=0.59, p<0.001), change in systolic blood pressure (β=0.14, p=0.01) and diabetes (β=-0.104, p=0.05) as the significant predictors. Introduction of treatment effect into the model non-significantly increased the fit of the model (r2=0.414, p=0.27-0.98). Conclusions: Pre-treatment Left Ventricular Mass Index and reduction in systolic blood pressure were the major determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy regression. We also observed that there is lesser left ventricular hypertrophy regression in diabetic patients, warranting future research to explore glycaemic control as a modifiable factor in left ventricular hypertrophy reversal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压心脏病逆转:一个多元线性回归模型
背景:原发性高血压左心室肥厚的发展增加了心血管疾病的死亡率和发病率。通过治疗性控制血压逆转左心室肥厚可降低不良心血管事件的风险。目的:探讨左心室肥厚消退的决定因素。方法:通过门诊连续筛查高血压左室肥厚患者,确定一组217例高血压左室肥厚患者。主要纳入标准是(i)血压大于140/90 mm Hg (ii)左心室质量指数分别大于115和95 gm/m2(男性和女性)。左心室质量指数在招募时和标准药物治疗24周后通过超声心动图测定。左心室质量指数的变化采用多元线性回归模型,包括分类和连续解释变量。药物治疗对左室质量指数变化的影响在治疗类别的虚拟编码变量模型中进行检验。结果:在简单线性回归中,与左室质量指数变化显著相关的变量为基线左室质量指数(r=0.62, p<0.001)、收缩压变化(r=0.22, p=0.001)、平均血压变化(r=0.16, p=0.02)、基线收缩压(r=0.15, p=0.02)、年龄(r=0.12, p=0.09)、糖尿病(r=0.12, p=0.09)。最佳拟合模型(r2=0.408)保留了基线左心室质量指数(β=0.59, p<0.001)、收缩压变化(β=0.14, p=0.01)和糖尿病(β=-0.104, p=0.05)作为显著预测因子。在模型中引入治疗效应后,模型的拟合度无显著提高(r2=0.414, p=0.27-0.98)。结论:治疗前左室质量指数和收缩压降低是左室肥厚消退的主要决定因素。我们还观察到糖尿病患者的左心室肥厚消退较少,这表明未来的研究需要探索血糖控制作为左心室肥厚逆转的可改变因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Dementia on Patients with Hip Fracture. Atrial Bigeminy, a Potential Diagnostic Clue for Glioblastoma. Mammary Myofibroblastoma - An Elusive Cause of Breast Lump. Roles of molecular neuroimaging techniques in Parkinsonism. Role of C-reactive protein in disease progression, diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1