Earth system boundaries and Earth system justice: sharing the ecospace

IF 5.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Politics Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1080/09644016.2023.2234794
J. Gupta, K. Prodani, Xuemi Bai, L. Gifford, T. Lenton, I. Otto, L. Pereira, C. Rammelt, J. Scholtens, J. Tàbara
{"title":"Earth system boundaries and Earth system justice: sharing the ecospace","authors":"J. Gupta, K. Prodani, Xuemi Bai, L. Gifford, T. Lenton, I. Otto, L. Pereira, C. Rammelt, J. Scholtens, J. Tàbara","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2023.2234794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on planetary and Earth system boundaries calls on humans to live within those boundaries. Sharing such limited ecospace raises questions of justice. Global environmental assessments and scholarship are increasingly paying attention to justice issues, yet inadequately define how to share the limited ecospace. Against this background we ask: how can global environmental assessments’ concerns for justice be enhanced through an Earth system justice framework that guides how the global community could share limited ecospace? Based on an analysis of how justice concerns are addressed in the Assessment of Assessments and global environmental change projects, we build an Earth system justice framework that discusses how ecospace can be shared fairly through the setting of Earth system boundaries and the provision of minimum resource needs for all, and how this can be achieved through an equitable redistribution of resources, rights, and responsibilities focused on addressing inequality, overconsumption, and harmful accumulation.","PeriodicalId":51393,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2234794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The literature on planetary and Earth system boundaries calls on humans to live within those boundaries. Sharing such limited ecospace raises questions of justice. Global environmental assessments and scholarship are increasingly paying attention to justice issues, yet inadequately define how to share the limited ecospace. Against this background we ask: how can global environmental assessments’ concerns for justice be enhanced through an Earth system justice framework that guides how the global community could share limited ecospace? Based on an analysis of how justice concerns are addressed in the Assessment of Assessments and global environmental change projects, we build an Earth system justice framework that discusses how ecospace can be shared fairly through the setting of Earth system boundaries and the provision of minimum resource needs for all, and how this can be achieved through an equitable redistribution of resources, rights, and responsibilities focused on addressing inequality, overconsumption, and harmful accumulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球系统边界与地球系统正义:共享生态空间
关于行星和地球系统边界的文献呼吁人类生活在这些边界内。共享如此有限的生态空间引发了正义问题。全球环境评估和学术界越来越关注正义问题,但没有充分定义如何共享有限的生态空间。在这种背景下,我们要问:如何通过地球系统正义框架来加强全球环境评估对正义的关注,该框架指导全球社会如何共享有限的生态空间?基于对评估和全球环境变化项目中如何解决司法问题的分析,我们建立了一个地球系统司法框架,讨论如何通过设定地球系统边界和为所有人提供最低资源需求来公平共享生态空间,以及如何通过公平分配资源、权利和责任来实现这一目标,重点是解决不平等、过度消费和有害积累问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Environmental Politics is concerned with four aspects of the study of environmental politics, with a primary, though not exclusive, focus on the industrialised countries. First, it examines the evolution of environmental movements and parties. Second it provides analysis of the making and implementation of public policy in the area of the environment at international, national and local levels. Third, it carries comment on ideas generated by the various environmental movements and organisations, and by individual theorists. Fourth, it aims to cover the international environmental issues which are of increasing salience.
期刊最新文献
The economy-environment tradeoff: are individual environmental priorities decoupled from national economic conditions? On the contested compliance of CBDRRC and the erosion of trust Labour strategies in the German automotive industry: limits and potentials of conversion from a Gramscian perspective Defending the climate cause within the state: the ministry of ecology and the drafting of France’s national low-carbon strategy (2017–2020) Pulling together or pulling apart? Understanding the heterogenous collective action frames of local climate activists through a Q methodology study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1