Mental Health and Well-Being During the First vs. Second COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Cyprus

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Journal of Psychology Open Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1024/2673-8627/a000008
Danae Papageorgiou, A. Kassianos, M. Constantinou, D. Lamnisos, Christiana Nicolaou, S. Papacostas, A. Gloster, M. Karekla
{"title":"Mental Health and Well-Being During the First vs. Second COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Cyprus","authors":"Danae Papageorgiou, A. Kassianos, M. Constantinou, D. Lamnisos, Christiana Nicolaou, S. Papacostas, A. Gloster, M. Karekla","doi":"10.1024/2673-8627/a000008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Introduction: Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries imposed strict governmental lockdowns. Research investigating the psychological impact of pandemic-induced lockdowns is accumulating, though to date no study has examined the psychological health and associated parameters of well-being in countries that underwent additional lockdowns as the pandemic continued into resurgence “waves.” Aim: The present study provides an overview of the psychological impact of COVID-19 across the two lockdowns in the Cypriot population. Methods: In total, 957 participants completed an online survey during the first lockdown, 134 of whom completed a similar survey again during the second lockdown. The outcomes assessed included stress, positive and negative affect, and well-being. Results: The results indicated no population-wide severe reactions in the participants. Repeated measures analyses showed similar mental health levels during both the first and the second lockdowns. Further inspection of participants’ scores indicated that, for all mental health variables, approximately half of the participants improved, while the other half deteriorated. Discussion: Perceived social support and psychological flexibility predicted most psychological outcomes during both lockdowns. Further research is necessary to understand the continuing effects of the pandemic and associated lockdowns on mental health.","PeriodicalId":29838,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. Introduction: Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries imposed strict governmental lockdowns. Research investigating the psychological impact of pandemic-induced lockdowns is accumulating, though to date no study has examined the psychological health and associated parameters of well-being in countries that underwent additional lockdowns as the pandemic continued into resurgence “waves.” Aim: The present study provides an overview of the psychological impact of COVID-19 across the two lockdowns in the Cypriot population. Methods: In total, 957 participants completed an online survey during the first lockdown, 134 of whom completed a similar survey again during the second lockdown. The outcomes assessed included stress, positive and negative affect, and well-being. Results: The results indicated no population-wide severe reactions in the participants. Repeated measures analyses showed similar mental health levels during both the first and the second lockdowns. Further inspection of participants’ scores indicated that, for all mental health variables, approximately half of the participants improved, while the other half deteriorated. Discussion: Perceived social support and psychological flexibility predicted most psychological outcomes during both lockdowns. Further research is necessary to understand the continuing effects of the pandemic and associated lockdowns on mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞浦路斯第一次与第二次COVID-19大流行封锁期间的心理健康和福祉
摘要新冠肺炎疫情爆发后,大多数国家都实施了严格的政府封锁。调查大流行导致的封锁对心理影响的研究正在积累,尽管迄今为止还没有研究调查随着大流行继续进入复苏“浪潮”而进行额外封锁的国家的心理健康和相关福祉参数。目的:本研究概述了COVID-19在两次封锁期间对塞浦路斯人口的心理影响。方法:共有957名参与者在第一次封锁期间完成了在线调查,其中134人在第二次封锁期间再次完成了类似的调查。评估的结果包括压力、积极和消极影响以及幸福感。结果:结果表明,在参与者中没有普遍的严重反应。重复测量分析显示,在第一次和第二次封锁期间,心理健康水平相似。对参与者得分的进一步检查表明,对于所有心理健康变量,大约一半的参与者改善了,而另一半则恶化了。讨论:感知社会支持和心理灵活性预测了两次封锁期间的大多数心理结果。有必要进一步研究,以了解大流行和相关封锁对心理健康的持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Psychology Open
European Journal of Psychology Open PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Community Involvement and Mental Health in Russian LGBT People Does Health Vulnerability Predict Voting for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Europe? The Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Job Demands and Job Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1