Initiation of Postpartum Contraception by 90 Days at a Midwest Academic Center

Natalie Eisenach, Mason E Uvodich, S. Wolff, Valerie French
{"title":"Initiation of Postpartum Contraception by 90 Days at a Midwest Academic Center","authors":"Natalie Eisenach, Mason E Uvodich, S. Wolff, Valerie French","doi":"10.17161/kjm.v13i.14564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Contraception is a critical component of addressing the health needs of women in the postpartum period. We assessed contraception initiation by 90 days postpartum at a large, academic medical center in the Midwest. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 299 charts were randomly sampled and 231 were analyzed from deliveries between May 1 to July 5, 2018. Contraceptive method, maternal demographics, and obstetric characteristics at hospital discharge were collected, as well as contraceptive method at the postpartum follow-up appointment. Methods and strata of contraception were categorized as follows: 1) highly effective methods (HEM) defined as sterilization, intrauterine device, or implant, 2) moderately effective methods (MEM) defined as injectable contraception, progestin-only pills, and combined estrogen/progestin pills, patches, and rings, and 3) less effective methods (LEM) defined as condoms, natural family planning, and lactational amenorrhea. Women lost to follow-up who had initiated a HEM or injectable contraception were coded as still using the method at 90 days. We used logistic regression to identity factors associated with HEM use. Results Of the 231 included patients, 118 (51%) received contraception before hospital discharge and 166 (83%) by 90 days postpartum. Postpartum visits were attended by 74% (171/231) of patients. Before hospital discharge, 28% (65/231) obtained a HEM and 41% (82/200) were using a HEM by 90 days postpartum. Patients obtaining HEM or injectable contraception before hospital discharge attended a follow-up visit less often than those who did not receive HEM before discharge (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54 – 0.86, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion When readily available, many women will initiate contraception in the postpartum period. Health systems should work to ensure comprehensive access to contraception for women in the postpartum period.","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"202 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.v13i.14564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction Contraception is a critical component of addressing the health needs of women in the postpartum period. We assessed contraception initiation by 90 days postpartum at a large, academic medical center in the Midwest. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 299 charts were randomly sampled and 231 were analyzed from deliveries between May 1 to July 5, 2018. Contraceptive method, maternal demographics, and obstetric characteristics at hospital discharge were collected, as well as contraceptive method at the postpartum follow-up appointment. Methods and strata of contraception were categorized as follows: 1) highly effective methods (HEM) defined as sterilization, intrauterine device, or implant, 2) moderately effective methods (MEM) defined as injectable contraception, progestin-only pills, and combined estrogen/progestin pills, patches, and rings, and 3) less effective methods (LEM) defined as condoms, natural family planning, and lactational amenorrhea. Women lost to follow-up who had initiated a HEM or injectable contraception were coded as still using the method at 90 days. We used logistic regression to identity factors associated with HEM use. Results Of the 231 included patients, 118 (51%) received contraception before hospital discharge and 166 (83%) by 90 days postpartum. Postpartum visits were attended by 74% (171/231) of patients. Before hospital discharge, 28% (65/231) obtained a HEM and 41% (82/200) were using a HEM by 90 days postpartum. Patients obtaining HEM or injectable contraception before hospital discharge attended a follow-up visit less often than those who did not receive HEM before discharge (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54 – 0.86, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion When readily available, many women will initiate contraception in the postpartum period. Health systems should work to ensure comprehensive access to contraception for women in the postpartum period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中西部学术中心开始产后避孕90天
避孕是解决妇女产后保健需要的一个重要组成部分。我们在中西部的一个大型学术医疗中心评估了产后90天开始避孕的情况。方法采用回顾性队列研究,随机抽取299例病例,分析2018年5月1日至7月5日分娩的231例病例。收集了出院时的避孕方法、产妇人口统计和产科特征,以及产后随访预约时的避孕方法。避孕方法和层次分为:1)高效方法(HEM),定义为绝育、宫内节育器或植入物;2)中等有效方法(MEM),定义为注射避孕、孕激素单药、雌激素/孕激素联合药片、贴片和环;3)低有效方法(LEM),定义为避孕套、自然计划生育和哺乳期闭经。失去随访的妇女开始了HEM或注射避孕,在第90天仍在使用该方法。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与HEM使用相关的因素。结果231例患者中,出院前采取避孕措施的118例(51%),产后90天采取避孕措施的166例(83%)。74%(171/231)的患者参加了产后随访。出院前有28%(65/231)的患者使用了HEM, 41%(82/200)的患者在产后90天使用了HEM。出院前接受HEM或注射避孕的患者随访次数少于出院前未接受HEM的患者(RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54 ~ 0.86, p≤0.01)。结论:在有条件的情况下,许多妇女会在产后开始避孕。卫生系统应努力确保产后妇女全面获得避孕药具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Large Left Atrial Myxoma Discovered During Restaging of Breast Cancer. New and Improved Kansas Journal of Medicine: Perspective from the Editor-in-Chief. Challenges in Anesthetic Management in a 25-Year-Old Patient with Ichthyosis. Factors Affecting Parental Intent to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 in the United States. Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1