The Comitology Proposal: Shifting the Legislative Balances in EU VAT

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2021012
Madeleine Merkx, J. Gruson
{"title":"The Comitology Proposal: Shifting the Legislative Balances in EU VAT","authors":"Madeleine Merkx, J. Gruson","doi":"10.54648/ecta2021012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the authors address the proposal to transform the status of the VAT Committee into a ‘comitology committee’ tabled by the European Commission in December 2020. The proposal basically confers implementation powers to the Commission via comitology in the area of EU Value Added Tax (hereinafter: VAT). If adopted by the EU Member States, this would lead to a groundbreaking situation in which for the first time in the area of taxation the decision-making based on unanimity of EU Member States is dropped in an area that does directly affect the EU Member States’ national tax revenues. The authors take this opportunity to explain the function and the consequences of the comitology procedure. After describing the core of the proposal, the authors pay a visit to other legislative areas in taxation where the comitology procedures apply before they dive deep in the scope of the powers granted under the proposal and reach a conclusion. The authors doubt whether the proposal will be adopted and whether EU Member States are prepared to confer more powers to the European Commission.\nVAT (Value Added Tax), legislative process, VAT Committee, proposal, comitology, implementing powers, interpretation, QMV (Qualified Majority Voting)","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2021012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article the authors address the proposal to transform the status of the VAT Committee into a ‘comitology committee’ tabled by the European Commission in December 2020. The proposal basically confers implementation powers to the Commission via comitology in the area of EU Value Added Tax (hereinafter: VAT). If adopted by the EU Member States, this would lead to a groundbreaking situation in which for the first time in the area of taxation the decision-making based on unanimity of EU Member States is dropped in an area that does directly affect the EU Member States’ national tax revenues. The authors take this opportunity to explain the function and the consequences of the comitology procedure. After describing the core of the proposal, the authors pay a visit to other legislative areas in taxation where the comitology procedures apply before they dive deep in the scope of the powers granted under the proposal and reach a conclusion. The authors doubt whether the proposal will be adopted and whether EU Member States are prepared to confer more powers to the European Commission. VAT (Value Added Tax), legislative process, VAT Committee, proposal, comitology, implementing powers, interpretation, QMV (Qualified Majority Voting)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学建议:改变欧盟增值税的立法平衡
在这篇文章中,作者讨论了欧盟委员会于2020年12月提出的将增值税委员会的地位转变为“滑稽委员会”的建议。该提案基本上通过在欧盟增值税(以下简称:增值税)领域的滑稽表演赋予了委员会执行权。如果欧盟成员国通过,这将导致一个开创性的局面,即在税收领域,基于欧盟成员国一致意见的决策首次在直接影响欧盟成员国国家税收的领域被取消。作者借此机会解释滑稽学程序的作用和后果。在描述了该提案的核心内容后,作者访问了适用滑稽程序的其他税收立法领域,然后深入研究了该提案授予的权力范围并得出结论。作者怀疑该提案是否会被通过,以及欧盟成员国是否准备赋予欧盟委员会更多权力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Editorial: We Need to Know When Previous Case-Law Has Been ‘Overruled’! - A Plea for More Legal Certainty in EU Tax Tax Information, Third Parties and GDPR: Legal Challenges and Hints from the Court of Justice DAC7: Some Thoughts on the Different Roles of Platform Operators and the Appropriate Definition of the Scope of Reporting Obligations Forum: AG Kokott Tries to Bring Clarity to the Selectivity Test for Individual Tax Rulings VAT in the Digital Age Package: Singling Out the Single VAT Registration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1