Taking a Critical Look at Adolescent Research on Black Girls and Women: A Systematic Review

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Adolescent Research Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1177/07435584221076054
Charlotte A. Agger, R. Roby, Korinthia D. Nicolai, Alison C. Koenka, M. Miles
{"title":"Taking a Critical Look at Adolescent Research on Black Girls and Women: A Systematic Review","authors":"Charlotte A. Agger, R. Roby, Korinthia D. Nicolai, Alison C. Koenka, M. Miles","doi":"10.1177/07435584221076054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of adolescent development, the language, theoretical frameworks, methods for collecting and analyzing data, and ways of interpretation that researchers use may advance notions of white supremacy and perpetuate racist ideas. Understanding how researchers study Black girls and women, in particular, is a critical step in working toward the production of science and knowledge that promotes an anti-racist and anti-sexist agenda and centers the voices of historically marginalized adolescents. Accordingly, we engaged in a systematic review (k = 48) with the goal of taking a critical look at how researchers study Black girls and women. Our synthesis of empirical articles from four prominent adolescent research journals published between 2010 and 2020 revealed themes related to (a) a dearth of critical theoretical frameworks, (b) a lack of acknowledgment of the intersectional experiences of Black girls and women, (c) differences in how researchers incorporate ethnic/racial information, (d) the use of a deficit perspective, and (e) the dominance of quantitative designs. We discuss these themes and conclude with recommendations for incorporating critical frameworks and more varied methodologies, issuing a call for adolescent development scholars to take a deeper, asset-based, and more critical approach to studying Black girls and their development.","PeriodicalId":47949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584221076054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the field of adolescent development, the language, theoretical frameworks, methods for collecting and analyzing data, and ways of interpretation that researchers use may advance notions of white supremacy and perpetuate racist ideas. Understanding how researchers study Black girls and women, in particular, is a critical step in working toward the production of science and knowledge that promotes an anti-racist and anti-sexist agenda and centers the voices of historically marginalized adolescents. Accordingly, we engaged in a systematic review (k = 48) with the goal of taking a critical look at how researchers study Black girls and women. Our synthesis of empirical articles from four prominent adolescent research journals published between 2010 and 2020 revealed themes related to (a) a dearth of critical theoretical frameworks, (b) a lack of acknowledgment of the intersectional experiences of Black girls and women, (c) differences in how researchers incorporate ethnic/racial information, (d) the use of a deficit perspective, and (e) the dominance of quantitative designs. We discuss these themes and conclude with recommendations for incorporating critical frameworks and more varied methodologies, issuing a call for adolescent development scholars to take a deeper, asset-based, and more critical approach to studying Black girls and their development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性地看待黑人女孩和妇女的青少年研究:系统回顾
在青少年发展领域,研究人员使用的语言、理论框架、收集和分析数据的方法以及解释方式可能会推动白人至上的观念,并使种族主义思想永久化。了解研究人员如何研究黑人女孩和妇女,尤其是这一点,是朝着创造科学和知识的方向迈出的关键一步,这些科学和知识促进了反种族主义和反性别歧视议程,并集中了历史上被边缘化的青少年的声音。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述(k=48),目的是对研究人员如何研究黑人女孩和妇女进行批判性研究。我们综合了2010年至2020年间发表的四篇著名青少年研究期刊的实证文章,揭示了与以下主题有关的主题:(a)缺乏批判性理论框架,(b)缺乏对黑人女孩和妇女交叉经历的承认,(c)研究人员如何整合种族/种族信息的差异,以及(e)定量设计的主导地位。我们讨论了这些主题,并提出了纳入关键框架和更多样方法的建议,呼吁青少年发展学者采取更深入、基于资产和更关键的方法来研究黑人女孩及其发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Research
Journal of Adolescent Research PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Adolescent Research is to publish lively, creative, and informative articles on development during adolescence (ages 10-18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18-25). The journal encourages papers that use qualitative, ethnographic, or other methods that present the voices of adolescents. Few strictly quantitative, questionnaire-based articles are published in the Journal of Adolescent Research, unless they break new ground in a previously understudied area. However, papers that combine qualitative and quantitative data are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
“I Wanna at Least Give Back so They Could Have an Idea of Doing Right”: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Understanding Black Adolescent Males’ Moral Development Exploring the Role of Social Media Content on Sexual Health Behaviors and Decision-Making Among Young Black Females “Imagine Growing Up Thinking the US is the Best Opportunity”: Immigrant Origin Youth of Color Supporting the Black Lives Matter Movement on Twitter Challenges and Strategies in Working with Latine Adolescents in a Math Enrichment Afterschool Activity Establishing a Reciprocal and Recursive Relationship Between Sociopolitical Development and Wellbeing for Early Emerging Adult College Students When “There Was a lot Happening in Both the World. . . and Within My Own Personal World”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1