Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer

R. Nerli, Manas Sharma, S. Ghagane, S. Patil, Pulkit Gupta, Neeraj S. Dixit, M. Hiremath
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer","authors":"R. Nerli, Manas Sharma, S. Ghagane, S. Patil, Pulkit Gupta, Neeraj S. Dixit, M. Hiremath","doi":"10.4103/JCRP.JCRP_18_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive malignancy, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 36% to 48% for pT3-4/pN+ tumors. Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the gold-standard treatment for the management of MIBC. Perioperative treatment can improve overall survival (OS), with more robust evidence favoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective: This review aims to discuss the historical perspectives, recent advances, experimental therapies, and current evidence for the use of various chemotherapeutic drugs in a neo-adjuvant setting for the treatment of MIBC. Data Sources: We searched and analyzed research articles, reviews, clinical trials, and meta-analyses addressing NAC in the management of MIBC. Results: The advantages of NAC in MIBC include the delivery of chemotherapy at the earliest time point when the micrometastatic burden is presumed to be the lowest. It has improved patient compliance and better tolerability in preoperative period with more number of patients completing the therapy. It reflects in vivo chemosensitivity of urothelial cancer along with favorable pathological outcomes in individual showing response. Delay in RC in nonresponders and overtreatment in low-stage disease are the potential disadvantages. Conclusion: NAC in MIBC is associated with improved OS. Cisplatin-based NAC is the current standard of care in eligible patients.","PeriodicalId":31219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"149 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCRP.JCRP_18_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive malignancy, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 36% to 48% for pT3-4/pN+ tumors. Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the gold-standard treatment for the management of MIBC. Perioperative treatment can improve overall survival (OS), with more robust evidence favoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective: This review aims to discuss the historical perspectives, recent advances, experimental therapies, and current evidence for the use of various chemotherapeutic drugs in a neo-adjuvant setting for the treatment of MIBC. Data Sources: We searched and analyzed research articles, reviews, clinical trials, and meta-analyses addressing NAC in the management of MIBC. Results: The advantages of NAC in MIBC include the delivery of chemotherapy at the earliest time point when the micrometastatic burden is presumed to be the lowest. It has improved patient compliance and better tolerability in preoperative period with more number of patients completing the therapy. It reflects in vivo chemosensitivity of urothelial cancer along with favorable pathological outcomes in individual showing response. Delay in RC in nonresponders and overtreatment in low-stage disease are the potential disadvantages. Conclusion: NAC in MIBC is associated with improved OS. Cisplatin-based NAC is the current standard of care in eligible patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱癌的新辅助化疗
背景:肌浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,pT3-4/pN+肿瘤的5年生存率为36% - 48%。根治性膀胱切除术(RC)仍然是治疗MIBC的金标准。围手术期治疗可以提高总生存率(OS),更有力的证据支持新辅助化疗(NAC)。目的:本综述旨在讨论在新辅助治疗环境中使用各种化疗药物治疗MIBC的历史观点、最新进展、实验疗法和当前证据。数据来源:我们检索并分析了涉及NAC在MIBC管理中的研究文章、综述、临床试验和荟萃分析。结果:NAC治疗MIBC的优势在于能在微转移负担最低的最早时间点给予化疗。患者依从性提高,术前耐受性提高,完成治疗的患者数量增多。它反映了尿路上皮癌的体内化学敏感性以及个体表现出良好的病理结果。无应答者的RC延迟和低期疾病的过度治疗是潜在的缺点。结论:mbc患者NAC与OS改善相关。以顺铂为基础的NAC是目前符合条件的患者的标准治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP aims to provide an exchange forum for the cancer researchers and practitioners to publish their timely findings in oncologic disciplines. The scope of the Journal covers basic, translational and clinical research, Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunotherapy, Hemato-oncology, Digestive cancer, Urinary tumor, Germ cell tumor, Breast cancer, Lung cancer, Head and Neck Cancer in a vast range of cancer related topics. The Journal also seeks to enhance and advance the cancer care standards in order to provide cancer patients the best care during the treatments.
期刊最新文献
Expert Consensus on Molecular Tumor Boards in Taiwan: Joint Position Paper by the Taiwan Oncology Society and the Taiwan Society of Pathology A juvenile female with ductal carcinoma In situ arising from a fibroadenoma Unfavorable tumor responses to immunotherapy in the liver: Lessons learned from clinical and preclinical studies Promising response with PI3K inhibitor for a patient with heavily pretreated PIK3CA mutation head-and-neck cancer Significance of baseline and changes of tumor markers and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting overall survival for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1