{"title":"La solidaridad como fuente de deberes. Elementos para su incardinación en el sistema jurídico-penal","authors":"Juan Ignacio Piña Rochefort","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992019000100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente articulo intenta ofrecer una sistematizacion de los usualmente llamados “deberes de solidaridad”, proponiendo una forma de integracion en el sistema general de deberes cuya infraccion puede justificar una sancion penal. Para ello se ofrece una sucinta revision historica del rol que ha desempenado la solidaridad como estructura de cohesion social desde el surgimiento de las primeras comunidades humanas hasta alcanzar su relativamente marginal posicion actual en la sociedad funcionalmente diferenciada. Especial mencion se hace a la forma en que el Derecho la ha reconocido en distintas instituciones juridicas. Asimismo, se ofrece una propuesta para explicar el alcance de los deberes generales de solidaridad y la legitimidad de su conminacion con una pena en un Derecho penal liberal. EnglishThis paper seeks to offer a systematized approach towards the so-called “duties of solidarity”, proposing a form of integration between them and the general regime of duties the violation of which could potentially lead to criminal liability. To that effect, the paper includes a brief historical discussion of the role that has been assigned to solidarity, as a structure geared towards social cohesion, since the emergence of the first human communities, until they reach their current relatively marginal situation vis-a-vis functionally differentiated society. The paper contains a specific discussion on how the Law has recognized these duties of solidarity throughout various legal institutions. Likewise, it posits a proposal to explain the scope of the general duties of solidarity and the legitimacy of punishment through a penalty under liberal criminal law.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politica Criminal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992019000100242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
espanolEl presente articulo intenta ofrecer una sistematizacion de los usualmente llamados “deberes de solidaridad”, proponiendo una forma de integracion en el sistema general de deberes cuya infraccion puede justificar una sancion penal. Para ello se ofrece una sucinta revision historica del rol que ha desempenado la solidaridad como estructura de cohesion social desde el surgimiento de las primeras comunidades humanas hasta alcanzar su relativamente marginal posicion actual en la sociedad funcionalmente diferenciada. Especial mencion se hace a la forma en que el Derecho la ha reconocido en distintas instituciones juridicas. Asimismo, se ofrece una propuesta para explicar el alcance de los deberes generales de solidaridad y la legitimidad de su conminacion con una pena en un Derecho penal liberal. EnglishThis paper seeks to offer a systematized approach towards the so-called “duties of solidarity”, proposing a form of integration between them and the general regime of duties the violation of which could potentially lead to criminal liability. To that effect, the paper includes a brief historical discussion of the role that has been assigned to solidarity, as a structure geared towards social cohesion, since the emergence of the first human communities, until they reach their current relatively marginal situation vis-a-vis functionally differentiated society. The paper contains a specific discussion on how the Law has recognized these duties of solidarity throughout various legal institutions. Likewise, it posits a proposal to explain the scope of the general duties of solidarity and the legitimacy of punishment through a penalty under liberal criminal law.